Cited by 15Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressDrug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

Safety and tolerance of Ester-C® compared with regular ascorbic acid

Gruenwald, Joerg, Graubaum, Hans-Joachim, Busch, Regina, Bentley, Christine·2006·Advances in Therapy

Abstract

The goal of this randomized, double-blind crossover clinical trial in 50 healthy volunteers sensitive to acidic foods was to evaluate whether Ester-C calcium ascorbate causes fewer epigastric adverse effects than are produced by regular ascorbic acid (AA). Volunteers were randomly separated into 2 groups of 25. The study comprised an observation period of 9 days (phase 1 medication for 3 consecutive days, washout phase for 3 consecutive days, phase 2 medication for 3 consecutive days). Participants took 1000 mg vitamin C as Ester-C during phase 1 of the study followed by 1000 mg of vitamin C as AA during phase 2, or vice versa. During the course of the study, 3 examinations for the evaluation of epigastric adverse effects were performed (on days 0, 3, and 9). Participants used a diary to record epigastric adverse effects on a daily basis. In total, 28 (56%) of 50 participants reported 88 epigastric adverse effects of mild to moderate intensity. Of these 88 adverse effects, 33 (37.5%) occurred after intake of Ester-C and 55 (62.5%) were noted after intake of AA. The tolerability of Ester-C was rated "very good" by 72% of participants, whereas AA was rated "very good" by only 54%. This difference is statistically significant (P<.05). Investigators concluded that Ester-C compared with AA caused significantly fewer epigastric adverse effects in participants sensitive to acidic foods and that Ester-C is much better tolerated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02850358

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruenwald, J., Graubaum, H.-J., Busch, R., & Bentley, C.
Affiliations
Analyze & Realize (Germany) (DE)
Venue
Advances in Therapy
Published
2006-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
171-178
ISSN
  • 0741-238X (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-8652
OpenAlex
W2065976717
Cited by
15
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Keywords
calcium ascorbate, vitamin C, gastrointestinal tolerance, vitamin C supplementation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Dehydroascorbic Acid, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Threonine, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review