The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The findings about the impact of teacher characteristics on ICT use confirms results reported earlier (van Braak et al., 2004) concerning 'innovativeness', 'attitudes regarding computers', 'intensity of ICT use', and 'gender'.”
From ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy (2008) · cites this paper as van Braak et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“The 'Class Use of Computer Scale' (van Braak et al., 2004) was developed for measuring how often teachers use computers in their classroom (Table 3).”
From ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy (2008) · cites this paper as van Braak et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Introducing Multilevel Modeling
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781849209366 · Cited by 2,997
Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach.
Bailey, F., Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. (1974) · Man · doi:10.2307/2800105 · Cited by 2,813
New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling
Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (2001) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410601858 · Cited by 1,339
High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. M. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038004813 · Cited by 1,235
Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition
Rogers, E. M. (1982) · Cited by 916
Roehrich, G. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00311-9 · Cited by 759
Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(02)00075-1 · Cited by 706
Pescher, C., & Tellis, G. J. (2019) · Diffusion fundamentals. · doi:10.62721/diffusion-fundamentals.32.1058 · Cited by 689
Reliability and Factorial Validity of Computer Attitude Scales
Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. P. (1984) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164484442033 · Cited by 615
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Arbuckle, J.L. (2003).Amos 5.0 Update to the Amos User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation.
- Arbuckle, J.L., & Wothke, W. (1999).Amos 4.0 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation.
- Cox, M., Abbott, C., Webb, M., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2004).ICT and Pedagogy — A review of the literature.ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series, 18. London: DfES/BECTA.
- Khine, S.M. (2001). Attitudes toward computers among teacher education students in Brunei Darussalam.International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(2), 147–152.
- Maier, P., Barnett, L., Warren, A., & Brunner, D. (1999).Using Technology in Teaching and Education. London: Kogan Page.
- Mathews, J.G., & Guarino, A.J. (2000). Predicting teacher computer use: A path analyses.International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(4), 385–392.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 · Cited by 2,556
Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a path model
Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2009) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y · Cited by 858
Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. V., & Tondeur, J. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010 · Cited by 840
Self-citationThe impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001 · Cited by 682
Self-citationFactors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process
Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018) · Educational Media International · doi:10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712 · Cited by 610
Metadata
- Authors
- van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Venue
- European Journal of Psychology of Education
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407-422
- ISSN
- 0256-2928 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-5174
- OpenAlex
- W2105858977
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Psychology of Education (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- primary school teachers, computer use, attitudes toward computers, technological innovativeness, computer experience, computer training, gender differences, teacher demographics, educational technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
