The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are women prejudiced against women?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109 · Cited by 3,150
Rudman, L. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629 · Cited by 1,511
Field Experiments on Discrimination
(2017) · Handbook of Economic Field Experiments · doi:10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.08.004 · Cited by 910
The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics
Ridgeway, C. L. (1991) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/70.2.367 · Cited by 848
What's in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching
MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4 · Cited by 762
Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective.
Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.1.51 · Cited by 685
Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x · Cited by 670
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779543000002 · Cited by 611
Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037//1076-8971.5.3.665 · Cited by 608
Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research
Foschi, M. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.21 · Cited by 599
Bornmann, L. (2011) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112 · Cited by 567
The Denial of Personal Discrimination
CROSBY, F. (1984) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/000276484027003008 · Cited by 549
Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments.
Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.5 · Cited by 536
Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1980) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257436 · Cited by 447
Implicit stereotyping in person judgment.
Banaji, M. R., Hardin, C., & Rothman, A. J. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.272 · Cited by 419
Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame.
Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.181 · Cited by 411
Pheterson, G. I., Kiesler, S. B., & Goldberg, P. A. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031215 · Cited by 379
Self-citationSexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making.
Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S. (1977) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.62.3.301 · Cited by 366
Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2006) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1 · Cited by 301
Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM
Silbiger, N. J., & Stubler, A. D. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.8247 · Cited by 189
Single- versus double-blind reviewing: an analysis of the literature
Snodgrass, R. (2006) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/1168092.1168094 · Cited by 118
Physical attractiveness: Its impact on the perception of a female counselor.
Lewis, K. N., & Walsh, W. B. (1978) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0167.25.3.210 · Cited by 57
Frable, D. E. S., Johnson, A. E., & Kellman, H. (1997) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00957.x · Cited by 38
Author Race, Essay Quality, and Reverse Discrimination
Fajardo, D. M. (1985) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00900.x · Cited by 25
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Double-Blind Refereeing
Cox, D., Gleser, L., Perlman, M., Reid, N., & Roeder, K. (1993) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177010904 · Cited by 21
What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?
Kuznetsov, I., Afzal, O. M., Dercksen, K., Dycke, N., Goldberg, A., Hope, T., Hovy, D., Kummerfeld, J. K., Lauscher, A., Leyton-Brown, K., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.06563 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldberg, P.
- Venue
- Trans-action
- Published
- 1968-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 28-30
- ISSN
- 0041-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966051366
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.