The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stringy effects in scrambling
Open accessAbstract
In [1] we gave a precise holographic calculation of chaos at the scrambling time scale. We studied the influence of a small perturbation, long in the past, on a two-sided correlation function in the thermofield double state. A similar analysis applies to squared commutators and other out-of-time-order one-sided correlators [2-6]. The essential bulk physics is a high energy scattering problem near the horizon of an AdS black hole. The above papers used Einstein gravity to study this problem; in the present paper we consider stringy and Planckian corrections. Elastic stringy corrections play an important role, effectively weakening and smearing out the development of chaos. We discuss their signature in the boundary field theory, commenting on the extension to weak coupling. Inelastic effects, although important for the evolution of the state, leave a parametrically small imprint on the correlators that we study. We briefly discuss ways to diagnose these small corrections, and we propose another correlator where inelastic effects are order one.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the context of semi-classical AdS/CFT, the OTOC is computed in gravity by a four-point function in a black hole background as shown in Fig. 12, see Shenker and Stanford (2015) for a detailed explanation.”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Shenker and Stanford (2015)
In the citing paper
“In this basis the S-matrix should be the Dray–‘t Hooft shockwave S-matrix , where and are the Kruskal momenta of the two particles being scattered. Applying the change of basis between the Dray–‘t Hooft S-matrix from Kruskal to Schwarschild energies, which can be found in Shenker and Stanford (2015), gives the expression:3.44”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Shenker and Stanford (2015)
Citations
Cites
Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter
Maldacena, J. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 · Cited by 1,555
Black holes and the butterfly effect
Shenker, S. H., & Stanford, D. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2014)067 · Cited by 1,533
Self-citationBlack Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?
Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., & Sully, J. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.3123 · Cited by 1,471
Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?
Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., & Sully, J. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2013)062 · Cited by 1,470
Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems
Hayden, P., & Preskill, J. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120 · Cited by 1,332
Sekino, Y., & Susskind, L. (2008) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/065 · Cited by 1,112
Black holes: Complementarity or firewalls?
Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., & Sully, J. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 978
Conformal collider physics: energy and charge correlations
A, D. M. H., & Maldacena, J. (2008) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/05/012 · Cited by 826
Strings in AdS3 and the SL(2,R) WZW model. I: The spectrum
MALDACENA, J. M., & Ooguri, H. (2001) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1377273 · Cited by 732
Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation
Dankert, C., Cleve, R., Emerson, J., & Livine, E. R. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.012304 · Cited by 683
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- B. Freivogel and L. Susskind, A Framework for the landscape, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 126007 [ hep-th/0408133 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- D.A. Roberts and D. Stanford, Two-dimensional conformal field theory and the butterfly effect, arXiv:1412.5123 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- J. de Boer, H. Ooguri, H. Robins and J. Tannenhauser, String theory on AdS 3, JHEP 12 (1998) 026 [ hep-th/9812046 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- J.M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, Strings in AdS 3 and the S L 2 ℝ $$ \mathrm{S}\mathrm{L}\left(2,\mathbb{R}\right) $$ WZW model. Part 3. Correlation functions, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 106006 [ hep-th/0111180 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 600
Toward simulating superstring/M-theory on a quantum computer
Gharibyan, H., Hanada, M., Honda, M., & Liu, J. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2021)140 · Cited by 34
Chaos and entanglement spreading in a non-commutative gauge theory
Fischler, W., Jahnke, V., & Pedraza, J. F. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2018)072 · Cited by 33
Chaos and pole skipping in CFT2
Ramirez, D. M. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2021)006 · Cited by 41
Random matrix theory of the isospectral twirling
Oliviero, S. F. E., Leone, L., Caravelli, F., & Hamma, A. (2021) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.10.3.076 · Cited by 40
Pole Skipping in Holographic Theories with Bosonic Fields
Wang, D., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.231603 · Cited by 34
Escaping the interiors of pure boundary-state black holes
Almheiri, A., Mousatov, A., & Shyani, M. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2023)024 · Cited by 58
Chaos bound and its violation in charged Kiselev black hole
Gao, C., Chen, D., Yu, C., & Wang, P. (2022) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137343 · Cited by 33
Chaos of Wilson loop from string motion near black hole horizon
Hashimoto, K., Murata, K., & Tanahashi, N. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.086007 · Cited by 33
Isospectral Twirling and Quantum Chaos
Leone, L., Oliviero, S. F. E., & Hamma, A. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23081073 · Cited by 36
Deformations of the Almheiri-Polchinski model
Kyono, H., Okumura, S., & Yoshida, K. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2017)173 · Cited by 32
Entanglement and chaos in warped conformal field theories
Apolo, L., He, S., Song, W., Xu, J., & Zheng, J. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2019)009 · Cited by 32
SYK correlators for all energies
Streicher, A. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)048 · Cited by 32
Out-of-time-order fluctuation-dissipation theorem
Tsuji, N., Shitara, T., & Ueda, M. (2018) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.97.012101 · Cited by 39
On thermalization in the SYK and supersymmetric SYK models
Hunter-Jones, N., Liu, J., & Zhou, Y. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2018)142 · Cited by 37
Topological Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model
Zhang, P., & Zhai, H. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.201112 · Cited by 31
When things stop falling, chaos is suppressed
Ageev, D. S., & Aref’eva, I. Y. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)100 · Cited by 31
Thermal diffusion and quantum chaos in neutral magnetized plasma
Li, W., Lin, S. Y., & Mei, J. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.046012 · Cited by 31
Entanglement of local operators and the butterfly effect
Kudler-Flam, J., Masahiro Nozaki, A., Ryu, S., & Tan, M. T. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033182 · Cited by 31
Unscrambling Quantum Information with Clifford Decoders
Oliviero, S. F. E., Leone, L., Lloyd, S., & Hamma, A. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.080402 · Cited by 31
Extending the scope of holographic mutual information and chaotic behavior
Sircar, N., Jacob Sonnenschein, B., & Tangarife, W. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2016)091 · Cited by 30
Regenesis and quantum traversable wormholes
Gao, P., & Liu, H. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2019)048 · Cited by 32
On chord dynamics and complexity growth in double-scaled SYK
Xu, J. (2025) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2025)259 · Cited by 29
Fast scrambling in holographic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair
Murata, K. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)049 · Cited by 26
On thermalization in the SYK and supersymmetric SYK models
Hunter-Jones, N. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep02%282018%29142 · Cited by 37
Quantum information scrambling: from holography to quantum simulators
Bhattacharyya, A., Joshi, L. K., & Sundar, B. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10377-y · Cited by 32
Out‐of‐Time‐Order Correlators and Quantum Phase Transitions in the Rabi and Dicke Models
Sun, Z., Cai, J., Tang, Q., Hu, Y., & Fan, H. (2020) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201900270 · Cited by 30
Regenesis and quantum traversable wormholes
Gao, P., & Liu, H. (2019) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep10%282019%29048 · Cited by 31
Butterflies with rotation and charge
Reynolds, A., & Ross, S. F. (2016) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/21/215008 · Cited by 28
Speed of quantum information spreading in chaotic systems
Couch, J., Eccles, S., Nguyen, P., Swingle, B. G., & Xu, S. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.045114 · Cited by 28
Holographic complexity under a global quantum quench
Fan, Z.-Y., & Guo, M. (2019) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114818 · Cited by 35
Chaos and pole-skipping in a simply spinning plasma
Amano, M. A. G., Blake, M., Cartwright, C., Kaminski, M., & Thompson, A. P. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2023)253 · Cited by 28
Bhagat, K. Y., Bose, B., Choudhury, S., Chowdhury, S., Das, R. N., Dastider, S. G., Gupta, N., Maji, A., Pasquino, G. D., & Paul, S. (2020) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13010044 · Cited by 27
Holographic probes of inner horizons
Balasubramanian, V. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep06%282020%29054 · Cited by 27
Soft graviton exchange and the information paradox
Gaddam, N., & Groenenboom, N. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.026007 · Cited by 27
Holographic open quantum systems: toy models and analytic properties of thermal correlators
Loganayagam, R., Rangamani, M., & Virrueta, J. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2023)153 · Cited by 27
Dynamical Transition of Operator Size Growth in Quantum Systems Embedded in an Environment
Zhang, P., & Yu, Z. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.250401 · Cited by 33
$$ \mathcal{N}=\left(0,\ 2\right) $$ SYK, chaos and higher-spins
Peng, C. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2018)065 · Cited by 36
Exploring the membrane theory of entanglement dynamics
Mezei, M., & Virrueta, J. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)013 · Cited by 27
Chaos and random matrices in supersymmetric SYK
Hunter-Jones, N. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep05%282018%29202 · Cited by 27
Thermalization and chaos in QED3
Steinberg, J., & Swingle, B. G. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.076007 · Cited by 26
Six-point functions and collisions in the black hole interior
Haehl, F. M., Streicher, A., & Zhao, Y. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2021)134 · Cited by 26
Holographic cameras: an eye for the bulk
Caron-Huot, S. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2023)047 · Cited by 26
Ávila, D., Jahnke, V., & Patiño, L. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2018)131 · Cited by 25
The bound on chaos for closed strings in Anti-de Sitter black hole backgrounds
Čubrović, M. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)150 · Cited by 25
Lian, B., Sondhi, S. L., & Yang, Z. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2019)067 · Cited by 25
Scrambling and decoding the charged quantum information
Liu, J. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043164 · Cited by 25
Decay of a thermofield-double state in chaotic quantum systems
del Campo, A., Molina-Vilaplana, J., dos Santos, L. F., & Sonner, J. (2018) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjst/e2018-00083-5 · Cited by 24
Chaos and random matrices in supersymmetric SYK
Hunter-Jones, N., & Liu, J. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2018)202 · Cited by 25
Weyl corrections to diffusion and chaos in holography
Li, W.-J., Liu, P., & Wu, J.-P. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2018)115 · Cited by 24
Maximal chaos from strings, branes and Schwarzian action
Banerjee, A., Kundu, A., & Poojary, R. R. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2019)076 · Cited by 24
Exact four point function for large q SYK from Regge theory
Choi, C., Mezei, M., & Sárosi, G. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2021)166 · Cited by 24
Optimizing measurement strengths for qubit quasiprobabilities behind out-of-time-ordered correlators
Mohseninia, R., Alonso, J. R. G., & Dressel, J. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.062336 · Cited by 23
Unruh detectors and quantum chaos in JT gravity
Blommaert, A., Mertens, T. G., & Verschelde, H. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)086 · Cited by 24
Scrambling and quantum chaos indicators from long-time properties of operator distributions
Omanakuttan, S., Chinni, K., Blocher, P. D., & Poggi, P. M. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.032418 · Cited by 27
Krylov complexity in the IP matrix model
Iizuka, N., & Nishida, M. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2023)065 · Cited by 24
Krylov complexity as an order parameter for deconfinement phase transitions at large N
Anegawa, T., Iizuka, N., & Nishida, M. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2024)119 · Cited by 24
A Traversable Wormhole Teleportation Protocol in the SYK ModelPreprint
Gao, P., & Jafferis, D. L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.07416 · Cited by 24
Traversable wormholes in AdS and bounds on information transfer
Freivogel, B., Galante, D. A., Nikolakopoulou, D., & Rotundo, A. F. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2020)050 · Cited by 23
Artificial neural network based computation for out-of-time-ordered correlators
Wu, Y., Duan, L.-M., & Deng, D.-L. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.214308 · Cited by 23
Rotating black holes in AdS spacetime, extremality, and chaos
Banerjee, A., Kundu, A., & Poojary, R. R. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.106013 · Cited by 23
Non-Lorentzian chaos and cosmological holography
Bagchi, A., Chakrabortty, S., Grumiller, D., Radhakrishnan, B., Riegler, M., & Sinha, A. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.l101901 · Cited by 23
Chaos in CFT dual to rotating BTZ
Craps, B., Khetrapal, S., & Rabideau, C. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)105 · Cited by 23
Scrambling time from local perturbations of the rotating BTZ black hole
Štikonas, A. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2019)054 · Cited by 21
Chen, D., & Gao, C. (2022) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aca820 · Cited by 23
Permutation orbifolds and chaos
Belin, A. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)131 · Cited by 23
Chaos in a QQ¯ system at finite temperature and baryon density
Pietro Colangelo, A., Fulvia De Fazio, A., & Losacco, N. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.074016 · Cited by 23
Comments on microcausality, chaos, and gravitational observables
Marolf, D. M. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/245003 · Cited by 22
Information scrambling at finite temperature in local quantum systems
Sahu, S., & Swingle, B. G. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.184303 · Cited by 19
Pole-skipping and hydrodynamic analysis in Lifshitz, AdS2 and Rindler geometries
Yuan, H., & Ge, X.-H. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2021)165 · Cited by 22
Out-of-time-order correlation as a witness for topological phase transitions
Bin, Q., Wan, L.-L., Nori, F., Wu, Y., & Lü, X. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.l020202 · Cited by 24
Pole-skipping of gravitational waves in the backgrounds of four-dimensional massive black holes
Grozdanov, S., & Vrbica, M. (2023) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12273-5 · Cited by 22
The q-Schwarzian and Liouville gravity
Blommaert, A., Mertens, T. G., & Yao, S. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2024)054 · Cited by 34
Collective diffusion and quantum chaos in holography
Wu, S.-F., Wang, B., Ge, X.-H., & Tian, Y. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.106018 · Cited by 22
Quantum critical scaling and holographic bound for transport coefficients near Lifshitz points
Inkof, G. A., Küppers, J. M. C., Link, J. M., Goutéraux, B., & Schmalian, J. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2020)088 · Cited by 22
Slow scrambling in extremal BTZ and microstate geometries
Craps, B., Clerck, M. D., Hacker, P., Nguyen, K., & Rabideau, C. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)020 · Cited by 22
An obstacle to sub-AdS holography for SYK-like models
Zhang, P., Gu, Y., & Kitaev, A. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)094 · Cited by 22
Unitary networks from the exact renormalization of wave functionals
Fliss, J. R., Leigh, R. G., & Parrikar, O. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.126001 · Cited by 21
Butterfly velocity bound and reverse isoperimetric inequality
Feng, X.-H., & Lü, H. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.066001 · Cited by 21
Out-of-time-ordered correlators in a (T2)n/Zn CFT
Caputa, P., Kusuki, Y., Takayanagi, T., & Watanabe, K. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.046020 · Cited by 21
Probing out-of-time-order correlators
Chaudhuri, S., & Loganayagam, R. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2019)006 · Cited by 21
Black holes as clouded mirrors: the Hayden-Preskill protocol with symmetry
Nakata, Y., Wakakuwa, E., & Koashi, M. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-21-928 · Cited by 25
Large p SYK from chord diagrams
Mukhametzhanov, B. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2023)154 · Cited by 21
Quantum chaos without false positives
Trunin, D. A. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.l101703 · Cited by 26
Refined quantum Lyapunov exponents from replica out-of-time-order correlators
Trunin, D. A. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.105023 · Cited by 26
Dynamical scaling laws of out-of-time-ordered correlators
Wei, B.-B., Sun, G., & Hwang, M.-J. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.195107 · Cited by 20
Holographic probes of inner horizons
Balasubramanian, V., Kar, A., & Sárosi, G. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2020)054 · Cited by 21
Six-point functions and collisions in the black hole interiorPreprint
Haehl, F. M., Streicher, A., & Zhao, Y. (2021) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · doi:10.1007/jhep08%282021%29134 · Cited by 23
Shock waves and delay of hyperfast growth in de Sitter complexity
Anegawa, T., & Iizuka, N. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)115 · Cited by 20
Key issues review: useful autonomous quantum machines
Guzmán, J. A. M., Erker, P., Gasparinetti, S., Huber, M., & Halpern, N. Y. (2024) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad8803 · Cited by 27
Superluminal chaos after a quantum quench
Balasubramanian, V., Craps, B., Clerck, M. D., & Nguyen, K. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)132 · Cited by 20
Butterflies from information metric
Miyaji, M. (2016) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 20
Comments on microcausality, chaos, and gravitational observables
Marolf, D. M. (2015) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 20
Quantization of out-of-time-ordered correlators in non-Hermitian chaotic systems
Zhao, W.-L. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023004 · Cited by 22
Shukla, R. K., Lakshminarayan, A., & Mishra, S. K. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.224307 · Cited by 19
Shukla, B., Dudal, D., & Mahapatra, S. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)178 · Cited by 19
Timelike BKL singularities and chaos in AdS/CFT
Shaghoulian, E., & Wang, H. (2016) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/12/125020 · Cited by 25
Butterflies from information metric
Miyaji, M. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2016)002 · Cited by 21
Broken bridges: a counter-example of the ER=EPR conjecture
Chen, P., Wu, C.-H., & Yeom, D.-H. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/040 · Cited by 19
AdS/CFT unitarity at higher loops: high-energy string scattering
Meltzer, D. O. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep05%282020%29133 · Cited by 19
Chaos exponents of SYK traversable wormholes
Nosaka, T., & Numasawa, T. (2021) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Shenker, S. H., & Stanford, D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Institute for Advanced Study (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stanford, Douglas
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1744159570
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 10
- FWCI
- 26.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1066293, 1314311, PHY-131-4311, 1316699)
- John Templeton Foundation
- Aspen Center for Physics (1066293, PHYS-1066293)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
- Keywords
- quantum chaos, scrambling, thermofield double state, out-of-time-order correlators, AdS black holes, string corrections, inelastic behavior, elastic scattering, weak coupling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review