The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stringy effects in scrambling
Open accessAbstract
In [1] we gave a precise holographic calculation of chaos at the scrambling time scale. We studied the influence of a small perturbation, long in the past, on a two-sided correlation function in the thermofield double state. A similar analysis applies to squared commutators and other out-of-time-order one-sided correlators [2-6]. The essential bulk physics is a high energy scattering problem near the horizon of an AdS black hole. The above papers used Einstein gravity to study this problem; in the present paper we consider stringy and Planckian corrections. Elastic stringy corrections play an important role, effectively weakening and smearing out the development of chaos. We discuss their signature in the boundary field theory, commenting on the extension to weak coupling. Inelastic effects, although important for the evolution of the state, leave a parametrically small imprint on the correlators that we study. We briefly discuss ways to diagnose these small corrections, and we propose another correlator where inelastic effects are order one.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the context of semi-classical AdS/CFT, the OTOC is computed in gravity by a four-point function in a black hole background as shown in Fig. 12, see Shenker and Stanford (2015) for a detailed explanation.”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Shenker and Stanford (2015)
In the citing paper
“In this basis the S-matrix should be the Dray–‘t Hooft shockwave S-matrix , where and are the Kruskal momenta of the two particles being scattered. Applying the change of basis between the Dray–‘t Hooft S-matrix from Kruskal to Schwarschild energies, which can be found in Shenker and Stanford (2015), gives the expression:3.44”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Shenker and Stanford (2015)
Citations
Cites
Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter
Maldacena, J. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 · Cited by 1,555
Black holes and the butterfly effect
Shenker, S. H., & Stanford, D. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2014)067 · Cited by 1,533
Self-citationBlack Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?
Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., & Sully, J. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.3123 · Cited by 1,471
Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?
Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., & Sully, J. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2013)062 · Cited by 1,470
Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems
Hayden, P., & Preskill, J. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120 · Cited by 1,332
Sekino, Y., & Susskind, L. (2008) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/065 · Cited by 1,112
Black holes: Complementarity or firewalls?
Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., & Sully, J. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 978
Conformal collider physics: energy and charge correlations
A, D. M. H., & Maldacena, J. (2008) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/05/012 · Cited by 826
Strings in AdS3 and the SL(2,R) WZW model. I: The spectrum
MALDACENA, J. M., & Ooguri, H. (2001) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1377273 · Cited by 732
Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation
Dankert, C., Cleve, R., Emerson, J., & Livine, E. R. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.012304 · Cited by 683
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- B. Freivogel and L. Susskind, A Framework for the landscape, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 126007 [ hep-th/0408133 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- D.A. Roberts and D. Stanford, Two-dimensional conformal field theory and the butterfly effect, arXiv:1412.5123 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- J. de Boer, H. Ooguri, H. Robins and J. Tannenhauser, String theory on AdS 3, JHEP 12 (1998) 026 [ hep-th/9812046 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- J.M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, Strings in AdS 3 and the S L 2 ℝ $$ \mathrm{S}\mathrm{L}\left(2,\mathbb{R}\right) $$ WZW model. Part 3. Correlation functions, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 106006 [ hep-th/0111180 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MALDACENA, J. M., Shenker, S. H., & Stanford, D. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2016)106 · Cited by 2,287
Self-citationRemarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model
Maldacena, J., & Stanford, D. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.106002 · Cited by 1,852
Self-citationConformal symmetry and its breaking in two-dimensional nearly anti-de Sitter space
Maldacena, J., Stanford, D., & Yang, Z. (2016) · Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics · doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw124 · Cited by 1,068
Self-citationHolographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?
Brown, A. R., Roberts, D. A., Susskind, L., Swingle, B. G., & Zhao, Y. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.191301 · Cited by 830
Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits
Nahum, A., Vijay, S., & Haah, J. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021014 · Cited by 791
Hosur, P., Qi, X.-L., Roberts, D. A., & Yoshida, B. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)004 · Cited by 718
The spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model
Polchinski, J., & Rosenhaus, V. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2016)001 · Cited by 699
Roberts, D. A., Stanford, D., & Susskind, L. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2015)051 · Cited by 637
Self-citationComplexity, action, and black holes
Brown, A. R., Roberts, D. A., Susskind, L., Swingle, B. G., & Zhao, Y. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.086006 · Cited by 661
The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual
Kitaev, A., & Suh, S. J. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2018)183 · Cited by 633
Gärttner, M., Bohnet, J., Safavi-Naini, A., Wall, M. L., Bollinger, J. J., & Rey, A. M. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys4119 · Cited by 640
Operator Hydrodynamics, OTOCs, and Entanglement Growth in Systems without Conservation Laws
von Keyserlingk, C. W., Rakovszky, T., Pollmann, F., & Sondhi, S. L. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021013 · Cited by 692
Black holes and random matrices
Cotler, J. S., Gur-Ari, G., Hanada, M., Polchinski, J., Saad, P., Shenker, S. H., Stanford, D., Streicher, A., & Tezuka, M. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)118 · Cited by 562
Self-citationDiagnosing Chaos Using Four-Point Functions in Two-Dimensional Conformal Field Theory
Roberts, D. A., & Stanford, D. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.131603 · Cited by 511
Self-citationFisher, M. P. A., Khemani, V., Nahum, A., & Vijay, S. (2022) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031720-030658 · Cited by 534
Chaos and complexity by design
Roberts, D. A., & Yoshida, B. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2017)121 · Cited by 521
Local criticality, diffusion and chaos in generalized Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models
Gu, Y., Qi, X.-L., & Stanford, D. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)125 · Cited by 439
Self-citationMeasuring Out-of-Time-Order Correlators on a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Quantum Simulator
Li, J., Fan, R., Wang, H., Ye, B., Zeng, B., Zhai, H., Peng, X., & Du, J. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.031011 · Cited by 442
Diving into traversable wormholes
MALDACENA, J. M., Stanford, D., & Yang, Z. (2017) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201700034 · Cited by 431
Self-citation(2017) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 323
Self-citationLieb-Robinson Bound and the Butterfly Effect in Quantum Field Theories
Roberts, D. A., & Swingle, B. G. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.091602 · Cited by 314
Out-of-time-order correlation for many-body localization
Fan, R., Zhang, P., Shen, H., & Zhai, H. (2017) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2017.04.011 · Cited by 322
MALDACENA, J. M., Simmons–Duffin, D., & Zhiboedov, A. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2017)013 · Cited by 286
Emergent statistical mechanics of entanglement in random unitary circuits
Zhou, T., & Nahum, A. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.174205 · Cited by 277
Aleiner, I. L., Faoro, L., & Ioffe, L. B. (2016) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2016.09.006 · Cited by 268
Chaos, complexity, and random matrices
Cotler, J. S., Hunter-Jones, N., Liu, J., & Yoshida, B. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)048 · Cited by 268
Light-ray operators in conformal field theory
Kravchuk, P., & Simmons-Duffin, D. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2018)102 · Cited by 258
Out-of-time-order correlators in quantum mechanics
Hashimoto, K., Murata, K., & Yoshii, R. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)138 · Cited by 282
Operator growth in the SYK model
Roberts, D. A., Stanford, D., & Streicher, A. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2018)122 · Cited by 241
Self-citationUniversal Charge Diffusion and the Butterfly Effect in Holographic Theories
Blake, M. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.091601 · Cited by 237
Out‐of‐time‐ordered correlators in many‐body localized systems
Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2016) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201600318 · Cited by 248
The factorization problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity
Harlow, D., & Jafferis, D. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)177 · Cited by 227
Bi-local holography in the SYK model
Jevicki, A., Suzuki, K., & Yoon, J. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2016)007 · Cited by 215
On entanglement spreading in chaotic systems
Mezei, M., & Stanford, D. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)065 · Cited by 205
Self-citationEffective Theory for the Measurement-Induced Phase Transition of Dirac Fermions
Buchhold, M., Minoguchi, Y., Altland, A., & Diehl, S. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041004 · Cited by 213
Chaos, complexity, and random matrices
Cotler, J. S. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep11%282017%29048 · Cited by 207
On the dynamics of near-extremal black holes
Nayak, P., Shukla, A., Soni, R. M., Trivedi, S. P., & Vishal, V. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2018)048 · Cited by 206
Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits
Piroli, L., Bertini, B., Cirac, J. I., & Prosen, T. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.094304 · Cited by 203
Light-ray operators in conformal field theory
Kravchuk, P. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep11%282018%29102 · Cited by 205
Onset of random matrix behavior in scrambling systems
Gharibyan, H., Hanada, M., Shenker, S. H., & Tezuka, M. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)124 · Cited by 199
Self-citationXu, T., Scaffidi, T., & Cao, X. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.140602 · Cited by 196
Many-body chaos at weak coupling
Stanford, D. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2016)009 · Cited by 193
Self-citationOut‐of‐time‐order correlations in many‐body localized and thermal phases
Chen, X., Zhou, T., Huse, D. A., & Fradkin, E. (2016) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201600332 · Cited by 190
A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos
Blake, M., Lee, H., & Liu, H. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2018)127 · Cited by 203
Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity
Mertens, T. G., & Turiaci, G. J. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00046-1 · Cited by 181
Bi-local holography in the SYK model
Jevicki, A. (2022) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep07%282016%29007 · Cited by 173
A general proof of the quantum null energy condition
Balakrishnan, S. (2022) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep09%282019%29020 · Cited by 182
Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography
Blake, M., Davison, R. A., Grozdanov, S., & Liu, H. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2018)035 · Cited by 158
The Schwarzian theory — origins
Mertens, T. G. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2018)036 · Cited by 162
Bounding the space of holographic CFTs with chaos
Perlmutter, E. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2016)069 · Cited by 158
Universality in chaos of particle motion near black hole horizon
Hashimoto, K., & Tanahashi, N. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.024007 · Cited by 155
A proof of the conformal collider bounds
A, D. M. H., Li, D., Meltzer, D. O., Poland, D., & Rejón-Barrera, F. G. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2016)111 · Cited by 154
Quantum complexity and negative curvature
Brown, A. R., Susskind, L., & Zhao, Y. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.045010 · Cited by 155
Locality, Quantum Fluctuations, and Scrambling
Xu, S., & Swingle, B. G. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031048 · Cited by 165
Jarzynski-like equality for the out-of-time-ordered correlator
Halpern, N. Y. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.012120 · Cited by 146
Quasiprobability behind the out-of-time-ordered correlator
Halpern, N. Y., Swingle, B. G., & Dressel, J. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.042105 · Cited by 166
Quantum epidemiology: operator growth, thermal effects, and SYK
Qi, X.-L., & Streicher, A. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2019)012 · Cited by 166
Chaos Signatures in the Short and Long Time Behavior of the Out-of-Time Ordered Correlator
García-Mata, I., Saraceno, M., Jalabert, R. A., Roncaglia, A. J., & Wisniacki, D. A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.210601 · Cited by 152
Large N algebras and generalized entropy
Chandrasekaran, V., Penington, G., & Witten, E. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2023)009 · Cited by 219
Scrambling Dynamics and Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators in Quantum Many-Body Systems
Xu, S., & Swingle, B. G. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.010201 · Cited by 192
Onset of many-body chaos in the O(N) model
Chowdhury, D., & Swingle, B. G. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.065005 · Cited by 151
Higher dimensional generalizations of the SYK model
Micha Berkooz, A., Narayan, P., Rozali, M., & Simón, J. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2017)138 · Cited by 138
Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Gauge Theories and Holography
Giataganas, D., Gürsoy, U., & Pedraza, J. F. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.121601 · Cited by 131
Translationally Invariant Non-Fermi-Liquid Metals with Critical Fermi Surfaces: Solvable Models
Chowdhury, D., Werman, Y., Berg, E., & Senthil, T. (2018) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · doi:10.6082/jtky0-rsr62 · Cited by 143
Universal diffusion in incoherent black holes
Blake, M. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.086014 · Cited by 123
Out-of-time-order correlation at a quantum phase transition
Shen, H., Zhang, P., Fan, R., & Zhai, H. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.054503 · Cited by 135
Black holes, complexity and quantum chaos
Magán, J. M. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2018)043 · Cited by 122
A general proof of the quantum null energy condition
Balakrishnan, S., Faulkner, T., Khandker, Z. U., & Wang, H. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2019)020 · Cited by 120
Dynamics of quantum information
Lewis-Swan, R. J., Safavi-Naini, A., Kaufman, A. M., & Rey, A. M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0090-y · Cited by 125
Translationally Invariant Non-Fermi-Liquid Metals with Critical Fermi Surfaces: Solvable Models
Chowdhury, D., Werman, Y., Berg, E., & Senthil, T. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031024 · Cited by 134
A supersymmetric SYK-like tensor model
Peng, C., Spradlin, M., & Volovich, A. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)062 · Cited by 119
Scrambling in random unitary circuits: Exact results
Bertini, B., & Piroli, L. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.064305 · Cited by 113
Chaos and complexity in quantum mechanics
Ali, T., Bhattacharyya, A., Haque, S. S., Kim, E. H., Moynihan, N., & Murugan, J. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.026021 · Cited by 112
Three dimensional view of the SYK/AdS duality
Das, S. R., Jevicki, A., & Suzuki, K. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2017)017 · Cited by 110
Spectral form factors and late time quantum chaos
Liu, J. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.086026 · Cited by 110
Out-of-Time-Ordered-Correlator Quasiprobabilities Robustly Witness Scrambling
Alonso, J. R. G., Halpern, N. Y., & Dressel, J. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.040404 · Cited by 120
Many-Body Chaos in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model
Kobrin, B., Yang, Z., Kahanamoku–Meyer, G. D., Olund, C. T., Moore, J. E., Stanford, D., & Yao, N. Y. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.030602 · Cited by 108
Self-citationShockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian quantum mechanics
Lam, H. T., Mertens, T. G., Turiaci, G. J., & Verlinde, H. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2018)182 · Cited by 123
The typical‐state paradox: diagnosing horizons with complexity
Susskind, L. (2016) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201500091 · Cited by 104
Efficient Quantum Pseudorandomness with Nearly Time-Independent Hamiltonian Dynamics
Nakata, Y., Hirche, C., Koashi, M., & Winter, A. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.021006 · Cited by 107
Eigenbranes in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity
Blommaert, A., Mertens, T. G., & Verschelde, H. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2021)168 · Cited by 112
Conformal blocks beyond the semi-classical limit
Fitzpatrick, A. L., & Jared Kaplan, A. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2016)075 · Cited by 95
Quantum entanglement of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models
Liu, C., Chen, X., & Balents, L. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.245126 · Cited by 95
Diffusion and chaos from near AdS2 horizons
Blake, M., & Donos, A. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)013 · Cited by 90
Quantum chaos in the Brownian SYK model with large finite N : OTOCs and tripartite information
Sünderhauf, C., Piroli, L., Qi, X.-L., Schuch, N., & Cirac, J. I. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2019)038 · Cited by 102
Competition between Chaotic and Nonchaotic Phases in a Quadratically Coupled Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model
Chen, X., Fan, R., Chen, Y., Zhai, H., & Zhang, P. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.207603 · Cited by 89
Grozdanov, S. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)048 · Cited by 84
A modular toolkit for bulk reconstruction
Faulkner, T., Li, M., & Wang, H. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2019)119 · Cited by 86
On the relation between the magnitude and exponent of OTOCs
Gu, Y., & Kitaev, A. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2019)075 · Cited by 84
Three dimensional view of the SYK/AdS duality
Das, S. R. (2022) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep09%282017%29017 · Cited by 84
Correlation functions, entanglement and chaos in the $$ T\overline{T}/J\overline{T} $$-deformed CFTs
He, S., & Shu, H. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)088 · Cited by 82
Tunable quantum chaos in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model coupled to a thermal bath
Chen, Y., Zhai, H., & Zhang, P. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2017)150 · Cited by 82
Kanazawa, T., & Tilo Wettig, B. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2017)050 · Cited by 86
Out-of-time-order operators and the butterfly effect
Cotler, J. S., Ding, D., & Penington, G. (2018) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.07.020 · Cited by 79
Conformal bootstrap in the Regge limit
Li, D., Meltzer, D. O., & Poland, D. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2017)013 · Cited by 78
Dispersive Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model: Band structure and quantum chaos
Zhang, P. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.205138 · Cited by 78
Classifying and constraining local four photon and four graviton S-matrices
Chowdhury, S. D., Gadde, A., Gopalka, T., Halder, I., Janagal, L., & Minwalla, S. N. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)114 · Cited by 78
Abbasi, N., & Tahery, S. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2020)076 · Cited by 78
Jan De Boer, A., Llabrés, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Vegh, D. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.201604 · Cited by 79
Scrambling time from local perturbations of the eternal BTZ black hole
Caputa, P., Simón, J., Štikonas, A., Tadashi Takayanagi, B., & Watanabe, K. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)011 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Shenker, S. H., & Stanford, D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Institute for Advanced Study (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stanford, Douglas
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1744159570
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 10
- FWCI
- 26.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1066293, 1314311, PHY-131-4311, 1316699)
- John Templeton Foundation
- Aspen Center for Physics (1066293, PHYS-1066293)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
- Keywords
- quantum chaos, scrambling, thermofield double state, out-of-time-order correlators, AdS black holes, string corrections, inelastic behavior, elastic scattering, weak coupling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review