Cited by 167Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtist diversity and phylogenyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Limitations of Metazoan 18S rRNA Sequence Data: Implications for Reconstructing a Phylogeny of the Animal Kingdom and Inferring the Reality of the Cambrian Explosion

Open access
Abouheif, Ehab, Zardoya, Rafael, Meyer, Axel·1998·Journal of Molecular Evolution

Abstract

We document the phylogenetic behavior of the 18S rRNA molecule in 67 taxa from 28 metazoan phyla and assess the effects of among-site rate variation on reconstructing phylogenies of the animal kingdom. This empirical assessment was undertaken to clarify further the limits of resolution of the 18S rRNA gene as a phylogenetic marker and to address the question of whether 18S rRNA phylogenies can be used as a source of evidence to infer the reality of a Cambrian explosion. A notable degree of among-site rate variation exists between different regions of the 18S rRNA molecule, as well as within all classes of secondary structure. There is a significant negative correlation between inferred number of nucleotide substitutions and phylogenetic information, as well as with the degree of substitutional saturation within the molecule. Base compositional differences both within and between taxa exist and, in certain lineages, may be associated with long branches and phylogenetic position. Importantly, excluding sites with different degrees of nucleotide substitution significantly influences the topology and degree of resolution of maximum-parsimony phylogenies as well as neighbor-joining phylogenies (corrected and uncorrected for among-site rate variation) reconstructed at the metazoan scale. Together, these data indicate that the 18S rRNA molecule is an unsuitable candidate for reconstructing the evolutionary history of all metazoan phyla, and that the polytomies, i.e., unresolved nodes within 18S rRNA phylogenies, cannot be used as a single or reliable source of evidence to support the hypothesis of a Cambrian explosion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/pl00006397

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abouheif, E., Zardoya, R., & Meyer, A.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Published
1998-10
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
394-405
ISSN
0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164314101
Cited by
167
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
18S rRNA, metazoan phylogeny, animals, Cambrian explosion, substitution saturation, phylogenetic markers, polytomies, nucleotide composition, nucleotide substitution, secondary structure, maximum parsimony, neighbor-joining
MeSH terms
Animals, Fossils, Humans, Invertebrates, Mammals, Models, Genetic, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Phylogeny, Regression Analysis, RNA, Ribosomal, 18S, Vertebrates, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review