Limitations of Metazoan 18S rRNA Sequence Data: Implications for Reconstructing a Phylogeny of the Animal Kingdom and Inferring the Reality of the Cambrian Explosion
Open accessAbstract
We document the phylogenetic behavior of the 18S rRNA molecule in 67 taxa from 28 metazoan phyla and assess the effects of among-site rate variation on reconstructing phylogenies of the animal kingdom. This empirical assessment was undertaken to clarify further the limits of resolution of the 18S rRNA gene as a phylogenetic marker and to address the question of whether 18S rRNA phylogenies can be used as a source of evidence to infer the reality of a Cambrian explosion. A notable degree of among-site rate variation exists between different regions of the 18S rRNA molecule, as well as within all classes of secondary structure. There is a significant negative correlation between inferred number of nucleotide substitutions and phylogenetic information, as well as with the degree of substitutional saturation within the molecule. Base compositional differences both within and between taxa exist and, in certain lineages, may be associated with long branches and phylogenetic position. Importantly, excluding sites with different degrees of nucleotide substitution significantly influences the topology and degree of resolution of maximum-parsimony phylogenies as well as neighbor-joining phylogenies (corrected and uncorrected for among-site rate variation) reconstructed at the metazoan scale. Together, these data indicate that the 18S rRNA molecule is an unsuitable candidate for reconstructing the evolutionary history of all metazoan phyla, and that the polytomies, i.e., unresolved nodes within 18S rRNA phylogenies, cannot be used as a single or reliable source of evidence to support the hypothesis of a Cambrian explosion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analyses of nuclear SSU rRNA sequences have limitations including nucleotide compositional bias, among site rate variation, and heterogeneous rates of evolution across lineages.
“Among the limitations noted are nucleotide compositional bias, among site rate variation, and heterogeneous rates of evolution across lineages (12–16).”
From Evaluating hypotheses of basal animal phylogeny using complete sequences of large and small subunit rRNA (2001) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Determining Divergence Times of the Major Kingdoms of Living Organisms with a Protein Clock
Doolittle, R. F., Feng, D.-F., Tsang, S., Cho, G., & Little, E. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5248.470 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Molecular Evidence for Deep Precambrian Divergences Among Metazoan Phyla
Wray, G. A., Levinton, J. S., & Shapiro, L. H. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5287.568 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa
Morris, S. C. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361219a0 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: evolutionary and phylogenetic implications.
(1988) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040480 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
A molecular‐clock date for the origin of the animal phyla
Runnegar, B. (1982) · Lethaia · doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1982.tb00645.x · Cited by 151 · see citing works
The cambrian evolutionary ‘explosion’ recalibrated
Fortey, R. A., Briggs, D. E. G., & Wills, M. A. (1997) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.950190510 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Nikoh, N., Iwabe, N., Kuma, K.-I., Ohno, M., Sugiyama, T., Watanabe, Y., Yasui, K., Shi-cui, Z., Hori, K., Shimura, Y., et al. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/pl00006208 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The new animal phylogeny: Reliability and implications
Adoutte, A., Balavoine, G., Lartillot, N., Lespinet, O., Prud'homme, B., & de Rosa, R. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.9.4453 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Medina, M., Collins, A. G., Silberman, J. D., & Sogin, M. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.171316998 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Rokas, A., & Carroll, S. B. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040352 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Fossils, molecules and embryos: new perspectives on the Cambrian explosion
Valentine, J. W., Jablonski, D., & Erwin, D. H. (1999) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.126.5.851 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
The phylogenetic position of ctenophores and the origin(s) of nervous systems
Jákely, G., Paps, J., & Nielsen, C. (2015) · EvoDevo · doi:10.1186/2041-9139-6-1 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
A Molecular Phylogenetic Framework for the Phylum Ctenophora Using 18S rRNA Genes
Podar, M., Haddock, S. H. D., Sogin, M. L., & Harbison, G. R. (2001) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.1036 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Simion, P., Bekkouche, N., Jager, M., Quéinnec, E., & Manuel, M. (2015) · Zoology · doi:10.1016/j.zool.2014.06.004 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The mouth, the anus, and the blastopore—open questions about questionable openings
Hejnol, A., & Martindale, M. Q. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Genomic, phylogenetic, and cell biological insights into metazoan origins
Nichols, S. A., Dayel, M. J., & King, N. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abouheif, E., Zardoya, R., & Meyer, A.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Evolution
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 394-405
- ISSN
- 0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164314101
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nbn-resolving.de
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- 18S rRNA, metazoan phylogeny, animals, Cambrian explosion, substitution saturation, phylogenetic markers, polytomies, nucleotide composition, nucleotide substitution, secondary structure, maximum parsimony, neighbor-joining
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Fossils, Humans, Invertebrates, Mammals, Models, Genetic, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Phylogeny, Regression Analysis, RNA, Ribosomal, 18S, Vertebrates, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review