CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Achilles’ heel of pluripotent stem cells: genetic, genomic and epigenetic variations during prolonged culture

Rebuzzini, Paola, Zuccotti, Maurizio, Redi, Carlo Alberto, Garagna, Silvia·2016·Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
DOI 10.1007/s00018-016-2171-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00018-016-2171-8

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 175

  1. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292:154–156 · DOI
  2. Martin GR (1981) Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:7634–7638 · DOI
  3. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282:1145–1147 · DOI
  4. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131:861–872 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S (2007) Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448:313–317 · DOI
  7. Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R, Brambrink T, Ku M, Hochedlinger K, Bernstein BE, Jaenisch R (2007) In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448:318–324 · DOI
  8. González F, Boué S, Izpisúa Belmonte JC (2011) Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogramming à la carte. Nat Rev Genet 12:231–242. doi: 10.1038/nrg2937 · DOI
  9. Zapata AG, Alfaro D, García-Ceca J (2012) Biology of stem cells: the role of microenvironments. Adv Exp Med Biol 741:135–151. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2098-9_10 · DOI
  10. Tichy ED, Stambrook PJ (2008) DNA repair in murine embryonic stem cells and differentiated cells. Exp Cell Res 314:1929–1936. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.02.007 · DOI
  11. Giachino C, Orlando L, Turinetto V (2013) Maintenance of genomic stability in mouse embryonic stem cells: relevance in aging and disease. Int J Mol Sci 14:2617–2636. doi: 10.3390/ijms14022617 · DOI
  12. Peterson SE, Loring JF (2014) Genomic instability in pluripotent stem cells: implications for clinical applications. J Biol Chem 289:4578–4584. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R113.516419 · DOI
  13. Oliveira PH, da Silva CL, Cabral JM (2014) Concise review: genomic instability in human stem cells: current status and future challenges. Stem Cells 32:2824–2832. doi: 10.1002/stem.1796 · DOI
  14. Rebuzzini P, Redi CA, Zuccotti M, Garagna S (2011) Genome stability in embryonic stem cells. In: Embryonic stem cells– recent advantages in pluripotent stem cell-based regenerative medicine Edited by Craig S, Atwood, p 399. doi: 10.5772/15091 · DOI
  15. Lowry WE, Richter L, Yachechko R, Pyle AD, Tchieu J, Sridharan R, Clark AT, Plath K (2008) Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2883–2888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711983105 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Draper JS, Smith K, Gokhale P, Moore HD, Maltby E, Johnson J, Meisner L, Zwaka TP, Thomson JA, Andrews PW (2004) Recurrent gain of chromosomes 17q and 12 in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 22:53–54 · DOI
  17. Baker DE, Harrison NJ, Maltby E, Smith K, Moore HD, Shaw PJ, Heath PR, Holden H, Andrews PW (2007) Adaptation to culture of human embryonic stem cells and oncogenesis in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 25:207–215 · DOI
  18. Amps K, Andrews PW, Anyfantis G et al (2011) Screening ethnically diverse human embryonic stem cells identifies a chromosome 20 minimal amplicon conferring growth advantage. Int Stem Cell Initiat Nat Biotechnol 29:1132–1144. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2051 · DOI
  19. Martins-Taylor K, Nisler BS, Taapken SM, Compton T, Crandall L, Montgomery KD, Lalande M, Xu RH (2011) Recurrent copy number variations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 29:488–491. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1890 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Olariu V, Harrison NJ, Coca D, Gokhale PJ, Baker D, Billings S, Kadirkamanathan V, Andrews PW (2010) Modeling the evolution of culture-adapted human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res 4:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2009.09.001 · DOI
  21. Longo L, Bygrave A, Grosveld FG, Pandolfi PP (1997) The chromosome make-up of mouse embryonic stem cells is predictive of somatic and germ cell chimaerism. Transgenic Res 6:321–328 · DOI
  22. Sugawara A, Goto K, Sotomaru Y, Sofuni T, Ito T (2006) Current status of chromosomal abnormalities in mouse embryonic stem cell lines used in Japan. Comp Med 56:31–34
  23. Kim YM, Lee JY, Xia L, Mulvihill JJ, Li S (2013) Trisomy 8: a common finding in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Mol Cytogenet 6:3. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-6-3 · DOI
  24. Rebuzzini P, Neri T, Mazzini G, Zuccotti M, Redi CA, Garagna S (2008) Karyotype analysis of the euploid cell population of a mouse embryonic stem cell line revealed a high incidence of chromosome abnormalities that varied during culture. Cytogenet Genome Res 121:18–24. doi: 10.1159/000124377 · DOI
  25. Rebuzzini P, Neri T, Zuccotti M, Redi CA, Garagna S (2008) Chromosome number variation in three mouse embryonic stem cell lines during culture. Cytotechnology 58:17–23. doi: 10.1007/s10616-008-9164-x · DOI
  26. Rebuzzini P, Pignalosa D, Mazzini G, Di Liberto R, Coppola A, Terranova N, Magni P, Redi CA, Zuccotti M, Garagna S (2012) Mouse embryonic stem cells that survive γ-rays exposure maintain pluripotent differentiation potential and genome stability. J Cell Physiol 227:1242–1249. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22908 · DOI
  27. Ben-David U, Benvenisty N (2012) High prevalence of evolutionarily conserved and species-specific genomic aberrations in mouse pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 30:612–622. doi: 10.1002/stem.1057 · DOI
  28. Gaztelumendi N, Nogués C (2014) Chromosome instability in mouse embryonic stem cells. Sci Rep 4:5324. doi: 10.1038/srep05324 · DOI
  29. Rebuzzini P, Zuccotti M, Redi CA, Garagna S (2015) Chromosomal abnormalities in embryonic and somatic stem cells. Cytogenet Genome Res 147:1–9. doi: 10.1159/000441645 · DOI
  30. Mayshar Y, Ben-David U, Lavon N, Biancotti JC, Yakir B, Clark AT, Plath K, Lowry WE, Benvenisty N (2010) Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7:521–531. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Chen Q, Shi X, Rudolph C, Yu Y, Zhang D, Zhao X, Mai S, Wang G, Schlegelberger B, Shi Q (2011) Recurrent trisomy and Robertsonian translocation of chromosome 14 in murine iPS cell lines. Chromosome Res 19:857–868. doi: 10.1007/s10577-011-9239-y · DOI
  32. Pasi CE, Dereli-Öz A, Negrini S, Friedli M, Fragola G, Lombardo A, Van Houwe G, Naldini L, Casola S, Testa G, Trono D, Pelicci PG, Halazonetis TD (2011) Genomic instability in induced stem cells. Cell Death Differ 18:745–753. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.9 · DOI
  33. Aasen T, Raya A, Barrero MJ, Garreta E, Consiglio A, Gonzalez F, Vassena R, Bilić J, Pekarik V, Tiscornia G, Edel M, Boué S, Izpisúa Belmonte JC (2008) Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes. Nat Biotechnol 26:1276–1284. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1503 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Chin MH, Mason MJ, Xie W, Volinia S, Singer M, Peterson C, Ambartsumyan G, Aimiuwu O, Richter L, Zhang J, Khvorostov I, Ott V, Grunstein M, Lavon N, Benvenisty N, Croce CM, Clark AT, Baxter T, Pyle AD, Teitell MA, Pelegrini M, Plath K, Lowry WE (2009) Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. Cell Stem Cell 5:111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.008 · DOI
  35. Boulting GL, Kiskinis E, Croft GF, Amoroso MW, Oakley DH, Wainger BJ, Williams DJ, Kahler DJ, Yamaki M, Davidow L, Rodolfa CT, Dimos JT, Mikkilineni S, MacDermott AB, Woolf CJ, Henderson CE, Wichterle H, Eggan K (2011) A functionally characterized test set of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 29:279–286. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1783 · DOI
  36. Liu P, Kaplan A, Yuan B, Hanna JH, Lupski JR, Reiner O (2014) Passage number is a major contributor to genomic structural variations in mouse iPSCs. Stem Cells 32:2657–2667. doi: 10.1002/stem.1779 · DOI
  37. Thompson SL, Bakhoum SF, Compton DA (2010) Mechanisms of chromosomal instability. Curr Biol 20:R285–R295 · DOI
  38. Holland AJ, Cleveland DW (2012) Losing balance: the origin and impact of aneuploidy in cancer. EMBO Rep 13:501–514. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.55 · DOI
  39. Zhang X, Lan W, Ems-McClung SC, Stukenberg PT, Walczak CE (2007) Aurora B phosphorylates multiple sites on mitotic centromere-associated kinesin to spatially and temporally regulate its function. Mol Biol Cell 18:3264–3276 · DOI
  40. Holubcová Z, Matula P, Sedláčková M, Vinarský V, Doležalová D, Bárta T, Dvořák P, Hampl A (2011) Human embryonic stem cells suffer from centrosomal amplification. Stem Cells 29:46–56. doi: 10.1002/stem.549 · DOI
  41. Brevini TA, Pennarossa G, Maffei S, Tettamanti G, Vanelli A, Isaac S, Eden A, Ledda S, de Eguileor M, Gandolfi F (2012) Centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability in human and animal parthenogenetic cell lines. Stem Cell Rev 8:1076–1087. doi: 10.1007/s12015-012-9379-2 · DOI
  42. Närvä E, Autio R, Rahkonen N, Kong L, Harrison N, Kitsberg D, Borghese L, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Rasool O, Dvorak P, Hovatta O, Otonkoski T, Tuuri T, Cui W, Brüstle O, Baker D, Maltby E, Moore HD, Benvenisty N, Andrews PW, Yli-Harja O, Lahesmaa R (2010) High-resolution DNA analysis of human embryonic stem cell lines reveals culture-induced copy number changes and loss of heterozygosity. Nat Biotechnol 28:371–377. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1615 · DOI
  43. Azuhata T, Scott D, Takamizawa S, Wen J, Davidoff A, Fukuzawa M, Sandler A (2001) The inhibitor of apoptosis protein survivin is associated with high-risk behavior of neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Surg 36:1785–1791 · DOI
  44. Calin GA, Sevignani C, Dumitru CD, Hyslop T, Noch E, Yendamuri S, Shimizu M, Rattan S, Bullrich F, Negrini M, Croce CM (2004) Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2999–3004 · DOI
  45. Caldas C, Brenton JD (2005) Sizing up miRNAs as cancer genes. Nat Med 11:712–714 · DOI
  46. Tanner MM, Tirkkonen M, Kallioniemi A, Isola J, Kuukasjärvi T, Collins C, Kowbel D, Guan XY, Trent J, Gray JW, Meltzer P, Kallioniemi OP (1996) Independent amplification and frequent co-amplification of three nonsyntenic regions on the long arm of chromosome 20 in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 56:3441–3445
  47. Midorikawa Y, Yamamoto S, Ishikawa S, Kamimura N, Igarashi H, Sugimura H, Makuuchi M, Aburatani H (2006) Molecular karyotyping of human hepatocellular carcinoma using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Oncogene 25:5581–5590 · DOI
  48. Koynova DK, Jordanova ES, Milev AD, Dijkman R, Kirov KS, Toncheva DI, Gruis NA (2007) Gene-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on tissue microarray to refine the region of chromosome 20q amplification in melanoma. Melanoma Res 17:37–41 · DOI
  49. Nguyen HT, Geens M, Mertzanidou A, Jacobs K, Heirman C, Breckpot K, Spits C (2014) Gain of 20q11.21 in human embryonic stem cells improves cell survival by increased expression of Bcl-xL. Mol Hum Reprod 20:168–177. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat077 · DOI
  50. Liang G, Zhang Y (2013) Embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell: an epigenetic perspective. Cell Res 23:49–69 · DOI
  51. Hussein SM, Batada NN, Vuoristo S, Ching RW, Autio R, Närvä E, Ng S, Sourour M, Hämäläinen R, Olsson C, Lundin K, Mikkola M, Trokovic R, Peitz M, Brüstle O, Bazett-Jones DP, Alitalo K, Lahesmaa R, Nagy A, Otonkoski T (2011) Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature 471:58–62. doi: 10.1038/nature09871 · DOI
  52. Quinlan AR, Boland MJ, Leibowitz ML, Shumilina S, Pehrson SM, Baldwin KK, Hall IM (2011) Genome sequencing of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells reveals retroelement stability and infrequent DNA rearrangement during reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 9:366–373. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.07.018 · DOI
  53. Abyzov A, Mariani J, Palejev D, Zhang Y, Haney MS, Tomasini L, Ferrandino AF, Rosenberg Belmaker LA, Szekely A, Wilson M, Kocabas A, Calixto NE, Grigorenko EL, Huttner A, Chawarska K, Weissman S, Urban AE, Gerstein M, Vaccarino FM (2012) Somatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 492:438–442. doi: 10.1038/nature11629 · DOI
  54. Chen Y, Guo L, Chen J, Zhao X, Zhou W, Zhang C, Wang J, Jin L, Pei D, Zhang F (2014) Genome-wide CNV analysis in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells reveals dosage effect of pluripotent factors on genome integrity. BMC Genom 15:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-79 · DOI
  55. Martins-Taylor K, Xu RH (2012) Concise review: genomic stability of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 30:22–27. doi: 10.1002/stem.705 · DOI
  56. Adams BR, Golding SE, Rao RR, Valerie K (2010a) Dynamic dependence on ATR and ATM for double-strand break repair in human embryonic stem cells and neural descendants. PLoS One 5:e10001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010001 · DOI
  57. Adams BR, Hawkins AJ, Povirk LF, Valerie K (2010) ATM-independent, high-fidelity nonhomologous end joining predominates in human embryonic stem cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2:582–596 · DOI
  58. Bogomazova AN, Lagarkova MA, Tskhovrebova LV, Shutova MV, Kiselev SL (2011) Error-prone nonhomologous end joining repair operates in human pluripotent stem cells during late G2. Aging (Albany NY) 3:584–596 · DOI
  59. Rithidech K, Bond VP, Cronkite EP, Thompson MH, Bullis JE (1995) Hypermutability of mouse chromosome 2 during the development of x-ray-induced murine myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:1152–1156 · DOI
  60. Maitra A, Arking DE, Shivapurkar N, Ikeda M, Stastny V, Kassauei K, Sui G, Cutler DJ, Liu Y, Brimble SN, Noaksson K, Hyllner J, Schulz TC, Zeng X, Freed WJ, Crook J, Abraham S, Colman A, Sartipy P, Matsui S, Carpenter M, Gazdar AF, Rao M, Chakravarti A (2005) Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 37:1099–1103 · DOI
  61. Lefort N, Feyeux M, Bas C, Féraud O, Bennaceur-Griscelli A, Tachdjian G, Peschanski M, Perrier AL (2008) Human embryonic stem cells reveal recurrent genomic instability at 20q11.21. Nat Biotechnol 26:1364–1366. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1509 · DOI
  62. Spits C, Mateizel I, Geens M, Mertzanidou A, Staessen C, Vandeskelde Y, Van der Elst J, Liebaers I, Sermon K (2008) Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 26:1361–1363. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1510 · DOI
  63. Liang Q, Conte N, Skarnes WC, Bradley A (2008) Extensive genomic copy number variation in embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17453–17456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805638105 · DOI
  64. Arlt MF, Rajendran S, Birkeland SR, Wilson TE, Glover TW (2012) De novo CNV formation in mouse embryonic stem cells occurs in the absence of Xrcc4-dependent nonhomologous end joining. PLoS Genet 8:e1002981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002981 · DOI
  65. Richards RI, Sutherland GR (1992) Dynamic mutations: a new class of mutations causing human disease. Cell 70:709–712 · DOI
  66. Umar A, Kunkel TA (1996) DNA-replication fidelity, mismatch repair and genome instability in cancer cells. Eur J Biochem 238:297–307 · DOI
  67. Meissner A (2010) Epigenetic modifications in pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nat Biotechnol 28:1079–1088. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1684 · DOI
  68. Ferguson-Smith AC (2011) Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat Rev Genet 12:565–575 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Bibikova M, Chudin E, Wu B, Zhou L, Garcia EW, Liu Y, Shin S, Plaia TW, Auerbach JM, Arking DE, Gonzalez R, Crook J, Davidson B, Schulz TC, Robins A, Khanna A, Sartipy P, Hyllner J, Vanguri P, Savant-Bhonsale S, Smith AK, Chakravarti A, Maitra A, Rao M, Barker DL, Loring JF, Fan JB (2006) Human embryonic stem cells have a unique epigenetic signature. Genome Res 16:1075–1083 · DOI
  70. Allegrucci C, Young LE (2007) Differences between human embryonic stem cell lines. Hum Reprod Update 13:103–120 · DOI
  71. Silva SS, Rowntree RK, Mekhoubad S, Lee JT (2008) X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic fluidity in human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4820–4825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712136105 · DOI
  72. Nagy A, Gócza E, Diaz EM, Prideaux VR, Iványi E, Markkula M, Rossant J (1990) Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Development 110:815–821 · DOI
  73. Bock C, Kiskinis E, Verstappen G, Gu H, Boulting G, Smith ZD, Ziller M, Croft GF, Amoroso MW, Oakley DH, Gnirke A, Eggan K, Meissner A (2011) Reference Maps of human ES and iPS cell variation enable high-throughput characterization of pluripotent cell lines. Cell 144:439–452. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.032 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Dean W, Bowden L, Aitchison A, Klose J, Moore T, Meneses JJ, Reik W, Feil R (1998) Altered imprinted gene methylation and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse fetuses: association with aberrant phenotypes. Development 125:2273–2282 · DOI
  75. Lund RJ, Närvä E, Lahesmaa R (2012) Genetic and epigenetic stability of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Rev Genet 13:732–744. doi: 10.1038/nrg3271 · DOI
  76. Nguyen HT, Geens M, Spits C (2013) Genetic and epigenetic instability in human pluripotent stem cells. Hum Reprod Update 19:187–205. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms048 · DOI
  77. Rugg-Gunn PJ, Ferguson-Smith AC, Pedersen RA (2005) Human embryonic stem cells as a model for studying epigenetic regulation during early development. Cell Cycle 4:1323–1326 · DOI
  78. Rugg-Gunn PJ, Ferguson-Smith AC, Pedersen RA (2007) Status of genomic imprinting in human embryonic stem cells as revealed by a large cohort of independently derived and maintained lines. Hum Mol Genet 16:R243–R251 · DOI
  79. Pick M, Stelzer Y, Bar-Nur O, Mayshar Y, Eden A, Benvenisty N (2009) Clone- and gene-specific aberrations of parental imprinting in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 27:2686–2690. doi: 10.1002/stem.205 · DOI
  80. Li SS, Yu SL, Singh S (2010) Epigenetic states and expression of imprinted genes in human embryonic stem cells. World J Stem Cells 2:97–102. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v2.i4.97 · DOI
  81. Nishino K, Toyoda M, Yamazaki-Inoue M, Fukawatase Y, Chikazawa E, Sakaguchi H, Akutsu H, Umezawa A (2011) DNA methylation dynamics in human induced pluripotent stem cells over time. PLoS Genet 7:e1002085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002085 · DOI
  82. Nazor KL, Altun G, Lynch C, Tran H, Harness JV, Slavin I, Garitaonandia I, Müller FJ, Wang YC, Boscolo FS, Fakunle E, Dumevska B, Lee S, Park HS, Olee T, D’Lima DD, Semechkin R, Parast MM, Galat V, Laslett AL, Schmidt U, Keirstead HS, Loring JF, Laurent LC (2012) Recurrent variations in DNA methylation in human pluripotent stem cells and their differentiated derivatives. Cell Stem Cell 10:620–634. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.013 · DOI
  83. Horii T, Hatada I (2013) Epigenetic instability in embryonic stem cells in “pluripotent stem cells”, edited by Deepa Bhartiya and Nibedita Lenka. INTECH Open Access Publisher. doi: 10.5772/54367 · DOI
  84. Humpherys D, Eggan K, Akutsu H, Hochedlinger K, Rideout WM 3rd, Biniszkiewicz D, Yanagimachi R, Jaenisch R (2001) Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice. Science 293:95–97 · DOI
  85. Piedrahita JA (2011) The role of imprinted genes in fetal growth abnormalities. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 91:682–692. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20795 · DOI
  86. Ishida M, Moore GE (2013) The role of imprinted genes in humans. Mol Aspects Med 34:826–840. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.06.009 · DOI
  87. Kouzarides T (2007) SnapShot: histone-modifying enzymes. Cell 131:822 · DOI
  88. Ludwig G, Nejman D, Hecht M, Orlanski S, Abu-Remaileh M, Yanuka O, Sandler O, Marx A, Roberts D, Benvenisty N, Bergman Y, Mendelsohn M, Cedar H (2014) Aberrant DNA methylation in ES cells. PLoS ONE 9:e96090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096090 · DOI
  89. Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, Cuff J, Fry B, Meissner A, Wernig M, Plath K, Jaenisch R, Wagschal A, Feil R, Schreiber SL, Lander ES (2006) A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125:315–326 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Planello AC, Ji J, Sharma V, Singhania R, Mbabaali F, Müller F, Alfaro JA, Bock C, De Carvalho DD, Batada NN (2014) Aberrant DNA methylation reprogramming during induced pluripotent stem cell generation is dependent on the choice of reprogramming factors. Cell Regen (Lond) 3:4. doi: 10.1186/2045-9769-3-4 · DOI
  91. Pollex T, Heard E (2012) Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation research. Curr Opin Cell Biol 24:825–832. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.10.007 · DOI
  92. Shen Y, Matsuno Y, Fouse SD, Rao N, Root S, Xu R, Pellegrini M, Riggs AD, Fan G (2008) X-inactivation in female human embryonic stem cells is in a nonrandom pattern and prone to epigenetic alterations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4709–4714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712018105 · DOI
  93. Dvash T, Lavon N, Fan G (2010) Variations of X chromosome inactivation occur in early passages of female human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 5:e11330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011330 · DOI
  94. Lucchesi JC, Kelly WG, Panning B (2005) Chromatin remodeling in dosage compensation. Annu Rev Genet 39:615–651 · DOI
  95. Liu W, Yin Y, Jiang Y, Kou C, Luo Y, Huang S, Zheng Y, Li S, Li Q, Guo L, Gao S, Sun X (2011) Genetic and epigenetic X-chromosome variations in a parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cell line. J Assist Reprod Genet 28:303–313. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9517-1 · DOI
  96. Lengner CJ, Gimelbrant AA, Erwin JA, Cheng AW, Guenther MG, Welstead GG, Alagappan R, Frampton GM, Xu P, Muffat J, Santagata S, Powers D, Barrett CB, Young RA, Lee JT, Jaenisch R, Mitalipova M (2010) Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations. Cell 141:872–883. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.010 · DOI
  97. Diaz Perez SV, Kim R, Li Z, Marquez VE, Patel S, Plath K, Clark AT (2012) Derivation of new human embryonic stem cell lines reveals rapid epigenetic progression in vitro that can be prevented by chemical modification of chromatin. Hum Mol Genet 21:751–764. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr506 · DOI
  98. Tchieu J, Kuoy E, Chin MH, Trinh H, Patterson M, Sherman SP, Aimiuwu O, Lindgren A, Hakimian S, Zack JA, Clark AT, Pyle AD, Lowry WE, Plath K (2010) Female human iPSCs retain an inactive X chromosome. Cell Stem Cell 7:329–342. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.024 · DOI
  99. Mekhoubad S, Bock C, de Boer AS, Kiskinis E, Meissner A, Eggan K (2012) Erosion of dosage compensation impacts human iPSC disease modeling. Cell Stem Cell 10:595–609. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.014 · DOI
  100. Kim D, Kim CH, Moon JI, Chung YG, Chang MY, Han BS, Ko S, Yang E, Cha KY, Lanza R, Kim KS (2009) Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. Cell Stem Cell 4:472–476. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  101. Marchetto MC, Carromeu C, Acab A, Yu D, Yeo GW, Mu Y, Chen G, Gage FH, Muotri AR (2010) A model for neural development and treatment of Rett syndrome using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell 143:527–539. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.016 · DOI · Paper page
  102. Bermejo-Alvarez P, Ramos-Ibeas P, Gutierrez-Adan A (2012) Solving the “X” in embryos and stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 21:1215–1224. doi: 10.1089/scd.2011.0685 · DOI
  103. Minkovsky A, Patel S, Plath K (2012) Concise review: pluripotency and the transcriptional inactivation of the female Mammalian X chromosome. Stem Cells 30:48–54. doi: 10.1002/stem.755 · DOI
  104. Navarro P, Chambers I, Karwacki-Neisius V, Chureau C, Morey C, Rougeulle C, Avner P (2008) Molecular coupling of Xist regulation and pluripotency. Science 321:1693–1695. doi: 10.1126/science.1160952 · DOI
  105. van Bemmel JG, Mira-Bontenbal H, Gribnau J (2015) Cis- and trans-regulation in X inactivation. Chromosoma. doi: 10.1007/s00412-015-0525-x · DOI
  106. Putiri EL, Robertson KD (2011) Epigenetic mechanisms and genome stability. Clin Epigenetics 2:299–314 · DOI
  107. Tsumura A, Hayakawa T, Kumaki Y, Takebayashi S, Sakaue M, Matsuoka C, Shimotohno K, Ishikawa F, Li E, Ueda HR, Nakayama J, Okano M (2006) Maintenance of self-renewal ability of mouse embryonic stem cells in the absence of DNA methyltransferases Dnmt1, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Genes Cells 11:805–814 · DOI
  108. Kimura H, Tada M, Nakatsuji N, Tada T (2004) Histone code modifications on pluripotential nuclei of reprogrammed somatic cells. Mol Cell Biol 24:5710–5720 · DOI
  109. Meshorer E, Misteli T (2006) Chromatin in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:540–546 · DOI
  110. Lonergan T, Bavister B, Brenner C (2007) Mitochondria in stem cells. Mitochondrion 7:289–296 · DOI
  111. Van Haute L, Spits C, Geens M, Seneca S, Sermon K (2013) Human embryonic stem cells commonly display large mitochondrial DNA deletions. Nat Biotechnol 31:20–23. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2473 · DOI
  112. Prigione A, Lichtner B, Kuhl H, Struys EA, Wamelink M, Lehrach H, Ralser M, Timmermann B, Adjaye J (2011) Human induced pluripotent stem cells harbor homoplasmic and heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA mutations while maintaining human embryonic stem cell-like metabolic reprogramming. Stem Cells 29:1338–1348. doi: 10.1002/stem.683 · DOI
  113. Pitceathly RD, Rahman S, Hanna MG (2012) Single deletions in mitochondrial DNA-molecular mechanisms and disease phenotypes in clinical practice. Neuromuscul Disord 22:577–586. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2012.03.009 · DOI
  114. Wallace DC, Chalkia D (2013) Mitochondrial DNA genetics and the heteroplasmy conundrum in evolution and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 3:a021220 · DOI
  115. Alexeyev MF (2009) Is there more to aging than mitochondrial DNA and reactive oxygen species? FEBS J 276:5768–5787. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07269.x · DOI
  116. Catalina P, Montes R, Ligero G, Sanchez L, de la Cueva T, Bueno C, Leone PE, Menendez P (2008) Human ESCs predisposition to karyotypic instability: is a matter of culture adaptation or differential vulnerability among hESC lines due to inherent properties? Mol Cancer 7:76. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-7-76 · DOI
  117. Peterson SE, Westra JW, Rehen SK, Young H, Bushman DM, Paczkowski CM, Yung YC, Lynch CL, Tran HT, Nickey KS, Wang YC, Laurent LC, Loring JF, Carpenter MK, Chun J (2011) Normal human pluripotent stem cell lines exhibit pervasive mosaic aneuploidy. PLoS ONE 6:e23018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023018 · DOI
  118. Biancotti JC, Narwani K, Buehler N, Mandefro B, Golan-Lev T, Yanuka O, Clark A, Hill D, Benvenisty N, Lavon N (2010) Human embryonic stem cells as models for aneuploid chromosomal syndromes. Stem Cells 28:1530–1540. doi: 10.1002/stem.483 · DOI
  119. Rebuzzini P, Fassina L, Mulas F, Bellazzi R, Redi CA, Di Liberto R, Magenes G, Adjaye J, Zuccotti M, Garagna S (2013) Mouse embryonic stem cells irradiated with γ-rays differentiate into cardiomyocytes but with altered contractile properties. Mutat Res 756:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.06.007 · DOI
  120. Luft S, Pignalosa D, Nasonova E, Arrizabalaga O, Helm A, Durante M, Ritter S (2014) Fate of D3 mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to X-rays or carbon ions. Mutat Res, Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 760:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.12.004 · DOI
  121. Ben-David U, Arad G, Weissbein U, Mandefro B, Maimon A, Golan-Lev T, Narwani K, Clark AT, Andrews PW, Benvenisty N, Carlos Biancotti J (2014) Aneuploidy induces profound changes in gene expression, proliferation and tumorigenicity of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun 5:4825. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5825 · DOI
  122. Bosman A, Letourneau A, Sartiani L, Del Lungo M, Ronzoni F, Kuziakiv R, Tohonen V, Zucchelli M, Santoni F, Guipponi M, Dumevska B, Hovatta O, Antonarakis SE, Jaconi ME (2015) Perturbations of heart development and function in cardiomyocytes from human embryonic stem cells with trisomy 21. Stem Cells 33:1434–1446. doi: 10.1002/stem.1961 · DOI
  123. Wang CC, Kazuki Y, Oshimura M, Ikeo K, Gojobori T (2011) Gene dosage imbalance of human chromosome 21 in mouse embryonic stem cells differentiating to neurons. Gene 481:93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2011.04.003 · DOI
  124. Ruiz S, Lopez-Contreras AJ, Gabut M, Marion RM, Gutierrez-Martinez P, Bua S, Ramirez O, Olalde I, Rodrigo-Perez S, Li H, Marques-Bonet T, Serrano M, Blasco MA, Batada NN, Fernandez-Capetillo O (2015) Limiting replication stress during somatic cell reprogramming reduces genomic instability in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun 6:8036. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9036 · DOI
  125. Gao Y, Han Z, Li Q, Wu Y, Shi X, Ai Z, Du J, Li W, Guo Z, Zhang Y (2015) Vitamin C induces a pluripotent state in mouse embryonic stem cells by modulating microRNA expression. FEBS J 282:685–699. doi: 10.1111/febs.13173 · DOI
  126. Otsuji TG, Bin J, Yoshimura A, Tomura M, Tateyama D, Minami I, Yoshikawa Y, Aiba K, Heuser JE, Nishino T, Hasegawa K, Nakatsuji N (2014) A 3D sphere culture system containing functional polymers for large-scale human pluripotent stem cell production. Stem Cell Reports 2:734–745. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.03.012 · DOI
  127. Lou YR, Kanninen L, Kuisma T, Niklander J, Noon LA, Burks D, Urtti A, Yliperttula M (2014) The use of nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel as a flexible three-dimensional model to culture human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 23:380–392. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0314 · DOI
  128. Lei Y, Jeong D, Xiao J, Schaffer DV (2014) Developing defined and scalable 3D culture systems for culturing human pluripotent stem cells at high densities. Cell Mol Bioeng 7:172–183 · DOI
  129. Xu K, Narayanan K, Lee F, Bae KH, Gao S, Kurisawa M (2015) Enzyme-mediated hyaluronic acid-tyramine hydrogels for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in 3D. Acta Biomater 24:159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.026 · DOI
  130. Takayama K, Kawabata K, Nagamoto Y, Kishimoto K, Tashiro K, Sakurai F, Tachibana M, Kanda K, Hayakawa T, Furue MK, Mizuguchi H (2013) 3D spheroid culture of hESC/hiPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells for drug toxicity testing. Biomaterials 34:1781–1789. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.029 · DOI
  131. Berger DR, Ware BR, Davidson MD, Allsup SR, Khetani SR (2015) Enhancing the functional maturity of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human hepatocytes by controlled presentation of cell-cell interactions in vitro. Hepatology 61:1370–1381. doi: 10.1002/hep.27621 · DOI
  132. Lew DJ, Burke DJ (2003) The spindle assembly and spindle position checkpoints. Annu Rev Genet 37:251–282 · DOI
  133. Musacchio A (2011) Spindle assembly checkpoint: the third decade. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:3595–3604. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0072 · DOI
  134. Rao CV, Yamada HY, Yao Y, Dai W (2009) Enhanced genomic instabilities caused by deregulated microtubule dynamics and chromosome segregation: a perspective from genetic studies in mice. Carcinogenesis 30:1469–1474. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp081 · DOI
  135. Thompson SL, Compton DA (2008) Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J Cell Biol 180:665–672 · DOI · Paper page
  136. Bakhoum SF, Thompson SL, Manning AL, Compton DA (2009) Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 11:27–35. doi: 10.1038/ncb1809 · DOI · Paper page
  137. Torres EM, Williams BR, Amon A (2008) Aneuploidy: cells losing their balance. Genetics 179:737–746. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.090878 · DOI
  138. Tanaka K, Hirota T (2009) Chromosome segregation machinery and cancer. Cancer Sci 100:1158–1165. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01178.x · DOI
  139. Silkworth WT, Nardi IK, Paul R, Mogilner A, Cimini D (2012) Timing of centrosome separation is important for accurate chromosome segregation. Mol Biol Cell 23:401–411. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-02-0095 · DOI
  140. Gregan J, Polakova S, Zhang L, Tolić-Nørrelykke IM, Cimini D (2011) Merotelic kinetochore attachment: causes and effects. Trends Cell Biol 21:374–381. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.01.003 · DOI
  141. Cimini D, Howell B, Maddox P, Khodjakov A, Degrassi F, Salmon ED (2001) Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J Cell Biol 153:517–527 · DOI · Paper page
  142. Adams RR, Carmena M, Earnshaw WC (2001) Chromosomal passengers and the (aurora) ABCs of mitosis. Trends Cell Biol 11:49–54 · DOI
  143. Kallio MJ, Beardmore VA, Weinstein J, Gorbsky GJ (2002) Rapid microtubule-independent dynamics of Cdc20 at kinetochores and centrosomes in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 158:841–847 · DOI
  144. Guerrero AA, Martínez AC, van Wely KH (2010) Merotelic attachments and non-homologous end joining are the basis of chromosomal instability. Cell Div 5:13. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-5-13 · DOI
  145. Salisbury JL, Whitehead CM, Lingle WL, Barrett SL (1999) Centrosomes and cancer. Biol Cell 91:451–460 · DOI
  146. Krämer A, Neben K, Ho AD (2002) Centrosome replication, genomic instability and cancer. Leukemia 16:767–775 · DOI
  147. Strnad P, Gönczy P (2008) Mechanisms of procentriole formation. Trends Cell Biol 18:389–396. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.06.004 · DOI
  148. Loncarek J, Khodjakov A (2009) Ab ovo or de novo? Mechanisms of centriole duplication. Mol Cells 27:135–142. doi: 10.1007/s10059-009-0017-z · DOI
  149. Nigg EA, Stearns T (2011) The centrosome cycle: centriole biogenesis, duplication and inherent asymmetries. Nat Cell Biol 13:1154–1160. doi: 10.1038/ncb2345 · DOI
  150. Holland AJ, Lan W, Niessen S, Hoover H, Cleveland DW (2010) Polo-like kinase 4 kinase activity limits centrosome overduplication by autoregulating its own stability. J Cell Biol 188:191–198. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200911102 · DOI
  151. Nigg EA (1998) Polo-like kinases: positive regulators of cell division from start to finish. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10:776–783 · DOI
  152. McCoy RC, Demko Z, Ryan A, Banjevic M, Hill M, Sigurjonsson S, Rabinowitz M, Fraser HB, Petrov DA (2015) Common variants spanning PLK4 are associated with mitotic-origin aneuploidy in human embryos. Science 348:235–238. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3337 · DOI
  153. Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K (1997) Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91:35–45 · DOI
  154. Iwaizumi M, Shinmura K, Mori H, Yamada H, Suzuki M, Kitayama Y, Igarashi H, Nakamura T, Suzuki H, Watanabe Y, Hishida A, Ikuma M, Sugimura H (2009) Human Sgo1 downregulation leads to chromosomal instability in colorectal cancer. Gut 58:249–260. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.149468 · DOI
  155. Zhang N, Ge G, Meyer R, Sethi S, Basu D, Pradhan S, Zhao YJ, Li XN, Cai WW, El-Naggar AK, Baladandayuthapani V, Kittrell FS, Rao PH, Medina D, Pati D (2008) Overexpression of Separase induces aneuploidy and mammary tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13033–13038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801610105 · DOI
  156. Gu W, Zhang F, Lupski JR (2008) Mechanisms for human genomic rearrangements. Pathogenetics 1:4. doi: 10.1186/1755-8417-1-4 · DOI
  157. Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR (2002) Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends Genet 18:74–82 · DOI
  158. Bailey JA, Eichler EE (2006) Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat Rev Genet 7:552–564 · DOI
  159. Arlt MF, Wilson TE, Glover TW (2012) Replication stress and mechanisms of CNV formation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22:204–210. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.01.009 · DOI
  160. Lieber MR, Gu J, Lu H, Shimazaki N, Tsai AG (2010) Nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) and chromosomal translocations in humans. Subcell Biochem 50:279–296. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3471-7_14 · DOI
  161. Woodward KJ, Cundall M, Sperle K, Sistermans EA, Ross M, Howell G, Gribble SM, Burford DC, Carter NP, Hobson DL, Garbern JY, Kamholz J, Heng H, Hodes ME, Malcolm S, Hobson GM (2005) Heterogeneous duplications in patients with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease suggest a mechanism of coupled homologous and nonhomologous recombination. Am J Hum Genet 77:966–987 · DOI
  162. Lee JH, Kim KH, Morio T, Kim H (2006) Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated-dependent activation of Ku in human fibroblasts exposed to hydrogen peroxide. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1091:76–82 · DOI · Paper page
  163. Lee JA, Carvalho CM, Lupski JR (2007) A DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell 131:1235–1247 · DOI · Paper page
  164. Wells RD (1996) Molecular basis of genetic instability of triplet repeats. J Biol Chem 271:2875–2878 · DOI
  165. Bestor TH (1992) Activation of mammalian DNA methyltransferase by cleavage of a Zn binding regulatory domain. EMBO J 11:2611–2617 · DOI
  166. Leonhardt H, Page AW, Weier HU, Bestor TH (1992) A targeting sequence directs DNA methyltransferase to sites of DNA replication in mammalian nuclei. Cell 71:865–873 · DOI
  167. Liang G, Chan MF, Tomigahara Y, Tsai YC, Gonzales FA, Li E, Laird PW, Jones PA (2002) Cooperativity between DNA methyltransferases in the maintenance methylation of repetitive elements. Mol Cell Biol 22:480–491. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.175 · DOI
  168. Yokochi T, Robertson KD (2002) Preferential methylation of unmethylated DNA by Mammalian de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a. J Biol Chem 277:11735–11745 · DOI
  169. Chedin F, Lieber MR, Hsieh CL (2002) The DNA methyltransferase-like protein DNMT3L stimulates de novo methylation by Dnmt3a. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16916–16921 · DOI
  170. Suetake I, Shinozaki F, Miyagawa J, Takeshima H, Tajima S (2004) DNMT3L stimulates the DNA methylation activity of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b through a direct interaction. J Biol Chem 279:27816–27823 · DOI
  171. Li JY, Pu MT, Hirasawa R, Li BZ, Huang YN, Zeng R, Jing NH, Chen T, Li E, Sasaki H, Xu GL (2007) Synergistic function of DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b in the methylation of Oct4 and Nanog. Mol Cell Biol 27:8748–8759 · DOI
  172. Jenuwein T, Allis CD (2001) Translating the histone code. Science 293:1074–1080 · DOI · Paper page
  173. Yang RF, Li CM, Qiu HR, Lu H, Wu HX, Xu JR, Li JY, Chen LJ (2010) Investigation of chromosome 1 aberrations in patients with multiple myeloma using cIg-FISH method and its significance. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 31:804–808
  174. Imreh MP, Gertow K, Cedervall J, Unger C, Holmberg K, Szöke K, Csöregh L, Fried G, Dilber S, Blennow E, Ahrlund-Richter L (2006) In vitro culture conditions favoring selection of chromosomal abnormalities in human ES cells. J Cell Biochem 99:508–516 · DOI
  175. Avery S, Hirst AJ, Baker D, Lim CY, Alagaratnam S, Skotheim RI, Lothe RA, Pera MF, Colman A, Robson P, Andrews PW, Knowles BB (2013) BCL-XL mediates the strong selective advantage of a 20q11.21 amplification commonly found in human embryonic stem cell cultures. Stem Cell Reports 1:379–386. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.10.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Rebuzzini, P., Zuccotti, M., Redi, C. A., & Garagna, S.
Venue
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-03-09
Volume
73
Issue
13
Pages
2453-2466
ISSN
  • 1420-682X
  • 1420-9071
DOI
10.1007/s00018-016-2171-8
Cited by
35
References
9
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review