Cited by 521Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsDNA Repair MechanismsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells

Open access
Thompson, Sarah L., Compton, Duane A.·2008·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Solid tumors can be highly aneuploid and many display high rates of chromosome missegregation in a phenomenon called chromosomal instability (CIN). In principle, aneuploidy is the consequence of CIN, but the relationship between CIN and aneuploidy has not been clearly defined. In this study, we use live cell imaging and clonal cell analyses to evaluate the fidelity of chromosome segregation in chromosomally stable and unstable human cells. We show that improper microtubule–chromosome attachment (merotely) is a cause of chromosome missegregation in unstable cells and that increasing chromosome missegregation rates by elevating merotely during consecutive mitoses generates CIN in otherwise stable, near-diploid cells. However, chromosome missegregation compromises the proliferation of diploid cells, indicating that phenotypic changes that permit the propagation of nondiploid cells must combine with elevated chromosome missegregation rates to generate aneuploid cells with CIN.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200712029

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Cahill, D.P., C. Lengauer, J. Yu, G.J. Riggins, J.K. Wilson, S.D. Markowitz, K.W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein. 1998. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature. 392: 300–303. 9521327
  2. Cimini, D., and F. Degrassi. 2005. Aneuploidy: a matter of bad connections. Trends Cell Biol. 15: 442–451. 16023855
  3. Cimini, D., C. Tanzarella, and F. Degrassi. 1999. Differences in malsegregation rates obtained by scoring ana-telophases or binucleate cells. Mutagenesis. 14: 563–568. 10567031
  4. Cimini, D., B. Howell, P. Maddox, A. Khodjakov, F. Degrassi, and E.D. Salmon. 2001. Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J. Cell Biol. 153: 517–527. 11331303 PMC2190575
  5. Cimini, D., L.A. Cameron, and E.D. Salmon. 2004. Anaphase spindle mechanics prevent mis-segregation of merotelically oriented chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 14: 2149–2155. 15589159
  6. DeLuca, J.G., W.E. Gall, C. Ciferri, D. Cimini, A. Musacchio, and E.D. Salmon. 2006. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell. 127: 969–982. 17129782
  7. Fodde, R., J. Kuipers, C. Rosenberg, R. Smits, M. Kielman, C. Gaspar, J.H. van Es, C. Breukel, J. Wiegant, R.H. Giles, and H. Clevers. 2001. Mutations in the APC tumor suppressor gene cause chromosomal instability. Nat. Cell Biol. 3: 433–438. 11283620
  8. Ganem, N.J., K. Upton, and D.A. Compton. 2005. Efficient mitosis in human cells lacking poleward microtubule flux. Curr. Biol. 15: 1827–1832. 16243029
  9. Gao, C., K. Furge, J. Koeman, K. Dykema, Y. Su, M.L. Cutler, A. Werts, P. Haak, and G.F. Vande Woude. 2007. Chromosome instability, chromosome transcriptome, and clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104: 8995–9000. 17517657 PMC1885616
  10. Gerstein, A.C., H.-J.E. Chun, A. Grant, and S.P. Otto. 2006. Genomic convergence toward diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLOS Genet. 2: e145. 17002497 PMC1570378
  11. Green, R.A., and K.B. Kaplan. 2003. Chromosome instability in colorectal tumor cells is associated with defects in microtubule plus-end attachments caused by dominant mutation in APC. J. Cell Biol. 163: 949–961. 14662741 PMC2173599
  12. Hauf, S., R.W. Cole, S. LaTerra, C. Zimmer, G. Schnapp, R. Walter, A. Heckel, J. van Meel, C.L. Rieder, and J.-M. Peters. 2003. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 161: 281–294. 12707311 PMC2172906
  13. Huang, H., J. Feng, J. Famulski, J.B. Rattner, S.T. Liu, G.D. Kao, R. Muschel, G.K.T. Chan, and T.J. Yen. 2007. Tripin/hSgo2 recruits MCAK to the inner centromere to correct defective kinetochore attachments. J. Cell Biol. 177: 413–424. 17485487 PMC2064832
  14. Joukov, V., A.C. Groen, T. Prokhorova, R. Gerson, E. White, A. Rodriguez, J.C. Walter, and D.M. Livingston. 2006. The BRCA1/BARD1 heterodimer modulates Ran-dependent mitotic spindle assembly. Cell. 127: 539–552. 17081976
  15. Kline-Smith, S.L., A. Khodjakov, P. Hergert, and C.E. Walczak. 2004. Depletion of centromeric MCAK leads to chromosome congression and segregation defects due to improper kinetochore attachments. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15: 1146–1159. 14699064 PMC363095
  16. Knowlton, A.L., W. Lan, and P.T. Stukenberg. 2006. Aurora B is enriched at merotelic attachment sites, where it regulates MCAK. Curr. Biol. 16: 1705–1710. 16950107
  17. Kuukasjarvi, T., R. Karhu, M. Tanner, M. Kahkonen, A. Schaffer, N. Nupponen, S. Pennanen, A. Kallioniemi, O.-P. Kallioniemi, and J. Isola. 1997. Genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution underlying development of asynchronous metastasis in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 57: 1597–1604. 9108466
  18. Lengauer, C., K.W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein. 1997. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature. 386: 623–627. 9121588
  19. Lingle, W.L., S.L. Barrett, V.C. Negron, A.B. D'Assoro, K. Boeneman, W. Liu, C.M. Whitehead, C. Reynolds, and J.L. Salisbury. 2002. Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99: 1978–1983. 11830638 PMC122305
  20. Liu, Y., and W.F. Bodmer. 2006. Analysis of p53 mutations and their expression in 56 colorectal cancer cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103: 976–981. 16418264 PMC1327731
  21. Michel, L.S., V. Liberal, A. Chatterjee, R. Kirchwegger, B. Pasche, W. Gerald, M. Dobles, P.K. Sorger, V.V.V.S. Murty, and R. Benezra. 2001. MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature. 409: 355–359. 11201745
  22. Rajagopalan, H., P.V. Jallepalli, C. Rago, V.E. Velculescu, K.W. Kinzler, B. Vogelstein, and C. Lengauer. 2004. Inactivation of hCDC4 can cause chromosomal instability. Nature. 428: 77–81. 14999283
  23. Salmon, E.D., D. Cimini, L.A. Cameron, and J.G. DeLuca. 2005. Merotelic kinetochores in mammalian tissue cells. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 360: 553–568. 15897180 PMC1569470
  24. Shi, Q., and R.W. King. 2005. Chromosomal nondisjunction yields tetraploid rather than aneuploid cells in human cell lines. Nature. 437: 1038–1042. 16222248
  25. Storchova, Z., and D. Pellman. 2004. From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5: 45–54. 14708009
  26. Tighe, A., V.L. Johnson, M. Albertella, and S.S. Taylor. 2001. Aneuploid colon cancer cells have a robust spindle checkpoint. EMBO Rep. 2: 609–614. 11454737 PMC1083941
  27. Torres, E.M., T. Sokolosky, C.M. Tucker, L.Y. Chan, M. Boselli, M.J. Dunham, and A. Amon. 2007. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science. 317: 916–924. 17702937
  28. Weaver, B.A.A., A.D. Silk, C. Montagna, P. Verdier-Pinard, and D.W. Cleveland. 2007. Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell. 11: 25–36. 17189716

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, S. L., & Compton, D. A.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Compton, Duane A.
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2008-02-18
Volume
180
Issue
4
Pages
665-672
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2153304690
Cited by
521
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 46
FWCI
16.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM51542, R01GM051542, T32GM008704, R37GM051542)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
chromosomal instability, aneuploidy, chromosome missegregation, merotelic attachment, mitotic spindle, live-cell imaging, solid tumors, cell proliferation
MeSH terms
Aneuploidy, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Chromosomes, Clone Cells, Diploidy, Humans, Microtubules, Mitosis, Spindle Apparatus, Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Microscopy, Video, Caco-2 Cells, Cell Lineage, Chromosome Segregation, Chromosomal Instability, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review