CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 277Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Afternoon exercise is more efficacious than morning exercise at improving blood glucose levels in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial

Open access
Savikj, Mladen, Gabriel, Brendan M., Alm, Petter S., Smith, Jonathon, Caidahl, Kenneth, Björnholm, Marie, Fritz, Tomas, Krook, Anna, Zierath, Juleen R., Wallberg-Henriksson, Harriet·2019·Diabetologia
DOI 10.1007/s00125-018-4767-zPMC PMC6323076
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Exercise is recommended for the treatment and prevention of type 2 diabetes. However, the most effective time of day to achieve beneficial effects on health remains unknown. We aimed to determine whether exercise training at two distinct times of day would have differing effects on 24 h blood glucose levels in men with type 2 diabetes. Eleven men with type 2 diabetes underwent a randomised crossover trial. Inclusion criteria were 45–68 years of age and BMI between 23 and 33 kg/m 2 . Exclusion criteria were insulin treatment and presence of another systemic illness. Researchers were not blinded to the group assignment. The trial involved 2 weeks of either morning or afternoon high-intensity interval training (HIIT) (three sessions/week), followed by a 2 week wash-out period and a subsequent period of the opposite training regimen. Continuous glucose monitor (CGM)-based data were obtained. Morning HIIT increased CGM-based glucose concentration (6.9 ± 0.4 mmol/l; mean ± SEM for the exercise days during week 1) compared with either the pre-training period (6.4 ± 0.3 mmol/l) or afternoon HIIT (6.2 ± 0.3 mmol/l for the exercise days during week 1). Conversely, afternoon HIIT reduced the CGM-based glucose concentration compared with either the pre-training period or morning HIIT. Afternoon HIIT was associated with elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH; 1.9 ± 0.2 mU/l) and reduced T 4 (15.8 ± 0.7 pmol/l) concentrations compared with pre-training (1.4 ± 0.2 mU/l for TSH; 16.8 ± 0.6 pmol/l for T 4 ). TSH was also elevated after morning HIIT (1.7 ± 0.2 mU/l), whereas T 4 concentrations were unaltered. Afternoon HIIT was more efficacious than morning HIIT at improving blood glucose in men with type 2 diabetes. Strikingly, morning HIIT had an acute, deleterious effect, increasing blood glucose. However, studies of longer training regimens are warranted to establish the persistence of this adverse effect. Our data highlight the importance of optimising the timing of exercise when prescribing it as treatment for type 2 diabetes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-018-4767-z

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 CGM-based glucose levels in response to HIIT. CGM-based glucose levels were assessed during the pre-training period and on exercise days (Exercise) and subsequent days (Rest). Blood glucose readings on Exercise days in (a) week 1 (n = 11) and (b) week 2 (n = 9), and on Rest days in (c) week 1 (n = 11) and (d) week 2 (n = 8). Red lines and symbols, morning exercise; blue lines and symbols, afternoon exercise; grey lines and symbols, matched pre-training days. Red arrows, time of morning exercise; blue arrows, time of afternoon exercise; grey arrows, snack offered. Using two-way ANOVA: §p < 0.05 for the effect of time; ¶p < 0.05 for the interaction between exercise and time. Using Tukey’s multiple comparison test: *p < 0.05 for the difference between exercise trials; †p < 0.05 for the difference between morning exercise trial and pre-training period; ‡p < 0.05 for the difference between afternoon exercise trial and pre-training period. Values are means + SEM
Fig. 1 CGM-based glucose levels in response to HIIT. CGM-based glucose levels were assessed during the pre-training period and on exercise days (Exercise) and subsequent days (Rest). Blood glucose readings on Exercise days in (a) week 1 (n = 11) and (b) week 2 (n = 9), and on Rest days in (c) week 1 (n = 11) and (d) week 2 (n = 8). Red lines and symbols, morning exercise; blue lines and symbols, afternoon exercise; grey lines and symbols, matched pre-training days. Red arrows, time of morning exercise; blue arrows, time of afternoon exercise; grey arrows, snack offered. Using two-way ANOVA: §p < 0.05 for the effect of time; ¶p < 0.05 for the interaction between exercise and time. Using Tukey’s multiple comparison test: *p < 0.05 for the difference between exercise trials; †p < 0.05 for the difference between morning exercise trial and pre-training period; ‡p < 0.05 for the difference between afternoon exercise trial and pre-training period. Values are means + SEMCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 277

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Savikj, M., Gabriel, B. M., Alm, P. S., Smith, J., Caidahl, K., Björnholm, M., Fritz, T., Krook, A., Zierath, J. R., & Wallberg-Henriksson, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
ORCID
Venue
Diabetologia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-11-13
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
233-237
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
DOI
10.1007/s00125-018-4767-z
PMC
PMC6323076
OpenAlex
W2901341108
Cited by
277
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13
FWCI
10.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Swedish Heart Lung Foundation (20150423)
  • Swedish Diabetes Foundation (DIA2012-082)
  • Stockholm County Council (SLL20170159)
  • Swedish Research Council (2015-00165)
  • Wenner-Gren Foundation
  • Strategic Research Program in Diabetes at Karolinska Institutet (2009-1068)
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF14OC0011493)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, exercise timing, high-intensity interval training, blood glucose, continuous glucose monitoring, thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroxine, morning exercise, exercise prescription
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review