Cited by 27Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationRegulation and Compliance Studies

The limitation of ethics-based approaches to regulating artificial intelligence: regulatory gifting in the context of Russia

Papyshev, Gleb, Yarime, Masaru·2024·AI & SOCIETY

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-022-01611-y

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papyshev, G., & Yarime, M.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Corresponding author
Yarime, Masaru
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2022-12-13
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
1381-1396
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W4311387252
Cited by
27
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AI & Society (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23K22142)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
Keywords
AI regulation, industry self-regulation, Big Tech, ethics washing, consumer protection, public interest, regulatory challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review