Cited by 62Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFoot and Ankle Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale into Turkish

Harput, Gulcan, Tok, Damla, Ulusoy, Burak, Eraslan, Leyla, Yildiz, Taha Ibrahim, Turgut, Elif, Demirci, Serdar, Duzgun, Irem, Tunay, Volga Bayrakci, Baltaci, Gul, Ergun, Nevin·2017·Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose To translate and culturally adapt the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale into Turkish (ACL-RSI-Tr) and examine and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version in individuals who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods The ACL-RSI was forward- and back-translated, culturally adapted and validated on ninety-three Turkish individuals who had undergone ACL reconstruction (5 females, 88 males; age 28.7 ± 8.6 years; body mass 80.1 ± 13.9 kg; height 178.8 ± 6.9 cm; body mass index 25.0 ± 3.7 kg/m 2 ). All patients completed the translated ACL-RSI, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and International Knee Documentary Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm questionnaires. We then analysed the internal consistency, reliability and validity of the newly formed ACL-RSI-Tr scale. Results The ACL-RSI-Tr showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.86) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.92) and was significantly correlated with the KOOS 'quality of life' (r = 0.58, p Conclusions The Turkish version of the ACL-RSI scale was valid, discriminant, consistent and reliable in patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction. This score could be useful to evaluate the effect of psychological factors on return to sport following ACL surgery. Level of evidence Diagnostic study, Level I.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00167-016-4288-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, Sebille V, Hardouin JB (2014) Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:176 · DOI
  2. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2012) Fear of re-injury in people who have returned to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Sci Med Sport 15(6):488–495 · DOI
  3. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE (2013) Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1549–1558 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR (2011) Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(12):1697–1705 · DOI
  5. Bohu Y, Klouche S, Lefevre N, Webster K, Herman S (2015) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(4):1192–1196 · DOI
  6. Celik D, Coşkunsu D, Kiliçoğlu O (2013) Translation and cultural adaptation of the Turkish Lysholm knee scale: ease of use, validity, and reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(8):2602–2610 · DOI
  7. Çelik D, Coşkunsu D, KiliÇoğlu Ö, Ergönül Ö, Irrgang JJ (2014) Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form into Turkish. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44(11):899–909 · DOI
  8. Everhart JS, Best TM, Flanigan DC (2015) Psychological predictors of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(3):752–762 · DOI
  9. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29(5):600–613 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kori S, Miller R, Todd D (1990) Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manag 3(1):35–43
  11. Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L (2005) Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(5):393–397 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kvist J, Osterberg A, Gauffin H, Tagesson S, Webster K, Ardern C (2013) Translation and measurement properties of the Swedish version of ACL-return to sports after injury questionnaire. Scand J Med Sci Sports 23(5):568–575 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lentz TA, Zeppieri G Jr, Tillman SM, Indelicato PA, Moser MW, George SZ, Chmielewski TL (2012) Return to preinjury sports participation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: contributions of demographic, knee impairment, and self-report measures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42(11):893–901 · DOI
  14. Logerstedt D, Di Stasi S, Grindem H, Lynch A, Eitzen I, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2014) Self-reported knee function can identify athletes who fail return-to-activity criteria up to 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a delaware-oslo ACL cohort study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44(12):914–923 · DOI
  15. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF (2003) A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 56(8):730–735 · DOI
  16. Muller U, Kruger-Franke M, Schmidt M, Rosemeyer B (2015) Predictive parameters for return to pre-injury level of sport 6 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(12):3623–3631 · DOI
  17. Paker N, Budayci D, Sabirli F, Ozel S, Ersoy S (2007) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: reliability and validation of the Turkish version. Turk Klin Tip Bilim 27(3):350–356
  18. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28(2):88–96 · DOI
  19. Slagers AJ, Reininga IH, van den Akker-Scheek I (2016) The Dutch language anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI)—validity and reliability. J Sports Sci 15:1–9
  20. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Tripp DA, Stanish W, Ebel-Lam A, Brewer BW, Birchard J (2007) Fear of reinjury, negative affect and catastrophizing predicting return to sport in recreational athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injuries at 1 year postsurgery. Rehabil Psychol 52:74–81 · DOI
  22. van Grinsven S, van Cingel RE, Holla CJ, van Loon CJ (2010) Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1128–1144 · DOI
  23. Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C (2008) Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport 9(1):9–15 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Yilmaz O, Yakut Y, Uygur F, Ulug N (2011) Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 22(1):44–49

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harput, G., Tok, D., Ulusoy, B., Eraslan, L., Yildiz, T. I., Turgut, E., Demirci, S., Duzgun, I., Tunay, V. B., Baltaci, G., & Ergun, N.
Affiliations
Hacettepe University (TR)
Venue
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-18
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
159-164
ISSN
  • 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7347
OpenAlex
W2517674392
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hacettepe Üniversitesi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, return to sport, ACL-RSI scale, Turkish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, psychometric properties, kinesiophobia, knee osteoarthritis, quality of life, psychological factors in recovery
MeSH terms
Return to Sport, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translations, Turkey, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review