CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 690Digital Platforms and EconomicsMerger and Competition AnalysisAuction Theory and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts

Open access
Armstrong, Mark, Wright, Julian·2007·Economic Theory
DOI 10.1007/s00199-006-0114-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00199-006-0114-6

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rochet, J.-C., Tirole, J.: Defining two-sided markets. Rand J Econ 2006 (in press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 690

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Armstrong, M., & Wright, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Wright, Julian
ORCID
Venue
Economic Theory
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2006-05-05
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
353-380
ISSN
  • 0938-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0479
DOI
10.1007/s00199-006-0114-6
OpenAlex
W3124640067
Cited by
690
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 22
FWCI
62.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Economic Theory (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
Keywords
two-sided markets, exclusive contracts, product differentiation, platform competition, gains from trade, platform heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review