Effects of deletion of gria1 or gria2 genes encoding glutamatergic AMPA-receptor subunits on place preference conditioning in mice
Abstract
Rationale The conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm has been used as a measure of the rewarding effects of a number of stimuli. Critically, this classical conditioning procedure requires the formation of associations between a rewarding stimulus and environmental cues, and the ability of these cues to direct subsequent behaviour.Objectives The purpose of the current experiments was to examine the role of glutamatergic transmission via subunit-specific populations of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) receptors in the formation of stimulus--reward associations involving contextual stimuli.Methods We investigated the ability of cocaine and food to induce a CPP in mice lacking either the GluR1 or GluR2 subunits of the AMPA receptor [gria1 or gria2 knockout (KO) mice]. In separate experiments, food pellets or cocaine (5--20 mg/kg IP) were paired with one compartment of the CPP apparatus, while no-food or vehicle was paired with an alternative compartment.Results Following conditioning, gria1 KOs displayed a significant preference for the food or cocaine-paired compartment, and did not differ from wild-type (WT) controls. However, gria2 knockouts displayed a preference for a cocaine-paired compartment, but not a food-paired compartment, indicating a specific deficit in place preference conditioning to food.Conclusions These results obtained using knockout mice indicate that GluR2-containing AMPA receptors may be critical for learning about contextual stimuli relevant to food rewards, but not drug rewards. When the results are considered in relation to our previous findings with gria1 and gria2 knockout mice, they also raise questions about the CPP paradigm representing a model of conditioned reward over a conditioned approach interpretation. However, it would be important to confirm these findings with alternative approaches, should selective ligands become available.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GRIA1 knockout mice exhibit defects in stimulus-reward learning, notably those related to food rewards.
“GRIA1 knockout mice exhibit defects in stimulus-reward learning, notably those related to food rewards (45).”
From Comparative analysis of the domestic cat genome reveals genetic signatures underlying feline biology and domestication (2014) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
Bardo, M. T., & Hammer, R. P. (1991) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(91)90226-e · Cited by 3,229 · see citing works
The Psychology of Animal Learning
Hill, W. F., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1976) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421765 · Cited by 2,397 · see citing works
The psychology of animal learning
Lea, S. E. G. (1975) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(75)90150-5 · Cited by 2,067 · see citing works
Tzschentke, T. (1998) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00060-4 · Cited by 1,254 · see citing works
2,3-Dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo(F)quinoxaline: a Neuroprotectant for Cerebral Ischemia
Sheardown, M. J., Nielsen, E. Ø., Hansen, A. J., Jacobsen, P., & Honoré, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2154034 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Importance of AMPA Receptors for Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity But Not for Spatial Learning
Zamanillo, D., Sprengel, R., Hvalby, Ø., Jensen, V., Burnashev, N., Rozov, A., Kaiser, K. M. M., Köster, H. J., Borchardt, T., Worley, P., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5421.1805 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Everitt, B. J., Morris, K. A., O'Brien, A., & Robbins, T. W. (1991) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(91)90145-e · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Enhanced LTP in Mice Deficient in the AMPA Receptor GluR2
Jia, Z., Agopyan, N., Miu, P., Xiong, Z., Henderson, J., Gerlai, R. T., Taverna, F. A., Velumian, A. A., MacDonald, J. F., Carlen, P. L., et al. (1996) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80225-1 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Hippocampus and context in classical conditioning
Holland, P. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)80027-0 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Gallagher, M., Graham, P., & Holland, P. (1990) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.10-06-01906.1990 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Burns, L. H., Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (1993) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(93)90113-5 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Elevated levels of GluR1 in the midbrain: a trigger for sensitization to drugs of abuse?
Carlezon, W. A., & Nestler, E. J. (2002) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02289-0 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
The hippocampus and contextual memory retrieval in Pavlovian conditioning
Maren, S., & Holt, W. (2000) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00188-6 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Cervo, L., & SAMANIN, R. (1995) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(94)01420-m · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Neural and psychological mechanisms underlying appetitive learning: links to drug addiction
Cardinal, R. N., & Everitt, B. J. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.004 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Retrograde amnesia after hippocampal damage: Recent vs. remote memories in two tasks
Sutherland, R. J., Weisend, M. P., Mumby, D. G., Astur, R. S., Hanlon, F. M., Koerner, A., Thomas, M. J., Wu, Y., Moses, S. N., Cole, C., et al. (2001) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/1098-1063(2001)11:1 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Robbins, T. W. (1978) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00426794 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Differential involvement of amygdala subsystems in appetitive conditioning and drug addiction
Everitt, B. J., Cardinal, R. N., Hall, J., Parkinson, J. A., & Robbins, T. W. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505013.003.0010 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Birch, P. J., Grossman, C. J., & Hayes, A. G. (1988) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0014-2999(88)90814-x · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Tzschentke, T., & Schmidt, W. (1997) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(97)83329-3 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Is the hippocampus necessary for contextual fear conditioning?
Gewirtz, J. C., McNish, K. A., & Davis, M. (2000) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00187-4 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
McAlonan, G. M., Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (1993) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(93)90410-h · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Quinoxaline derivatives are high-affinity antagonists of the NMDA receptor-associated glycine sites
Kessler, M., Baudry, M., & LYNCH, G. S. (1989) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(89)90875-5 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Diazepam dependence prevented by glutamate antagonists.
Steppuhn, K. G., & Turski, L. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.14.6889 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Multiple behavioral anomalies in GluR2 mutant mice exhibiting enhanced LTP
Gerlai, R. T., Henderson, J. T., Roder, J., & Jia, Z. (1998) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(98)00002-3 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Carlezon, W. A., Haile, C. N., Coppersmith, R., Hayashi, Y., Malinow, R., Neve, R. L., & Nestler, E. J. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-05-j0002.2000 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Selective Disruption of Stimulus-Reward Learning in Glutamate Receptorgria1Knock-Out Mice
Mead, A. N., & Stephens, D. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-03-01041.2003 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citationLayer, R. T., Uretsky, N. J., & Wallace, L. J. (1993) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(93)91094-9 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Mead, A. N., & Stephens, D. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-29-09500.2003 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationDNQX in the nucleus accumbens inhibits cocaine-induced conditioned place preference
Kaddis, F. G., Uretsky, N. J., & Wallace, L. J. (1995) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(95)00786-p · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Mead, A. N., & Stephens, D. (1999) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(24)34861-x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationMead, A. N., Vasilaki, A., Spyraki, C., Duka, T., & Stephens, D. (1999) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00828.x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationYoneda, Y., Suzuki, T., Ogita, K., & Han, D. (1993) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb03195.x · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Schmitt, W. B., Deacon, R. M. J., Reisel, D., et al. (2004) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.10168 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Pellegrini-Giampietro, D. E., Galli, A., Alesiani, M., et al. (1989) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb12675.x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
NBQX is a selective non-NMDA receptor antagonist in rat hippocampal slice°
Goldstein, J. M., & Litwin, L. C. (1993) · Molecular and Chemical Neuropathology · doi:10.1007/bf03160028 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tzschentke, T. M. (2007) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2007.00070.x · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
REVIEW: Behavioural assessment of drug reinforcement and addictive features in rodents: an overview
Sanchis‐Segura, C., & Spanagel, R. (2006) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2006.00012.x · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Biological substrates of reward and aversion: A nucleus accumbens activity hypothesis
Carlezon, W. A., & Thomas, M. J. (2009) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.075 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Montague, M. J., Li, G., Gandolfi, B., Khan, R., Aken, B. L., Searle, S. M. J., Minx, P., Hillier, L. W., Koboldt, D. C., Davis, B. W., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1410083111 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
AMPA receptor plasticity in the nucleus accumbens after repeated exposure to cocaine
Wolf, M. E., & Ferrario, C. R. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.013 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mead, A. N., Brown, G., Le Merrer, J., & Stephens, D. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stephens, David N.
- ORCID
- Stephens, David N.
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2004-12-24
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 164-171
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2016776306
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- conditioned place preference, AMPA receptor subunits, GluR1, GluR2, glutamatergic neurotransmission, cocaine reward, food reward, contextual conditioning, stimulus-reward associations
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Choice Behavior, Cocaine, Conditioning, Classical, Food, Reward, Receptors, AMPA, Mice, Knockout, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review