Cited by 97Stress Responses and CortisolSmoking Behavior and CessationHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Hormonal, cardiovascular, and subjective responses to acute stress in smokers

Open access
Childs, Emma, de Wit, Harriet·2009·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale There are complex relationships between stress and smoking; smoking may reduce the emotional discomfort of stress, yet nicotine activates stress systems and may alter responses to acute stress. It is important to understand how smoking affects physiological and psychological outcomes after stress and how these may interact to motivate smoking. Objectives This study aimed to examine the magnitude and time course of hormonal, cardiovascular, and psychological responses to acute psychosocial stress in smokers and non-smokers to investigate whether responses to acute stress are altered in smokers. Materials and methods Healthy male non-smokers (n = 20) and smokers (n = 15) participated in two experimental sessions involving a standardized public speaking stress procedure and a control non-stressful task. The outcome measures included self-reported mood, cardiovascular measures (heart rate and blood pressure), and plasma hormone levels (noradrenaline, cortisol, progesterone, and allopregnanolone). Results Smokers exhibited blunted increases in cortisol after the Trier Social Stress Test, and they reported greater and more prolonged subjective agitation than non-smokers. Stress-induced changes in progesterone were similar between smokers and non-smokers, although responses overall were smaller among smokers. Stress did not significantly alter levels of allopregnanolone, but smokers exhibited lower plasma concentrations of this neurosteroid. Conclusions These findings suggest that smoking dampens hormonal responses to stress and prolongs subjective discomfort. Dysregulated stress responses may represent a breakdown in the body's ability to cope efficiently and effectively with stress and may contribute to smokers' susceptibility to acute stress, especially during abstinence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-008-1359-5

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In men, neurosteroid levels are also variable, but fluctuations are lower than in females.

    “In men, neurosteroid levels are also variable, but fluctuations are lower than in females [69].”

    From Fibromyalgia pathogenesis explained by a neuroendocrine multistable model (2024) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Introduction says the study included only men and excluded women because of concerns about menstrual-cycle variability. The Discussion reports considerable variation in allopregnanolone levels between male participants, but the paper does not compare fluctuations in men and women or establish that they are lower in men. No page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Astrand P Rodahl K Textbook of work physiology Physiological basis of exercise 1977 2nd ed. New York McGraw-Hill Book Co.
  2. Kirschbaum C Pirke KM Hellhammer DH The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’—a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting Neuropsychobiology 1993b 28 76 81 8255414
  3. Spielberger C Gorsuch R Lushene R Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 1970 Washington, DC Consulting Psychologist Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Childs, E., & de Wit, H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Childs, Emma
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2008-10-21
Volume
203
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2065292219
Cited by
97
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Chicago
  • Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 02812, R01DA002812)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR 000555, M01RR000055)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
smoking, acute psychosocial stress, nicotine, cortisol, norepinephrine, progesterone, allopregnanolone, heart rate, blood pressure, stress coping, nicotine withdrawal, Trier Social Stress Test, non-smokers
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, Hormones, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Motivation, Norepinephrine, Pregnanolone, Progesterone, Smoking, Speech, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Tobacco Use Disorder, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review