Cited by 59Tryptophan and brain disordersStress Responses and CortisolNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Lipopolysaccharide-induced experimental immune activation does not impair memory functions in humans

Grigoleit, Jan-Sebastian, Oberbeck, J. Reiner, Lichte, Philipp, Kobbe, Philipp, Wolf, Oliver T., Montag, Thomas, Rey, Adriana del, Gizewski, Elke R. +2 more·2010·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Systemic immune activation occurring together with release of peripheral cytokines can affect behavior and the functioning of the central nervous system (CNS). However, it remains unknown whether and to what extent cognitive functions like memory and attention are affected during transient immune activation. We employed a human endotoxemia model and standardized neuropsychological tests to assess the cognitive effects of an experimental inflammation in two groups of 12 healthy young men before and after intravenous injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Escherichia coli, 0.4 ng/kg) or physiological saline. Endotoxin administration caused a profound transient physiological response with elevations in body temperature, number of circulating neutrophils, and increases in plasma cytokine levels [interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α], and concentrations of norepinephrine, ACTH and cortisol. However, these changes in immune and neuroendocrine parameters were not associated with alterations of memory performance, selective attention or executive functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.09.011

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across four studies, endotoxin exposure had no significant effect on digit span forward or backward performance.

    “Among the four studies that have been conducted, no significant effect of endotoxin exposure on digit span forward or backward performance was observed (Grigoleit et al., 2010; Krabbe et al., 2005; Reichenberg et al., 2001; van den Boogaard et al., 2010).”
  • No significant effects of inflammation on visuospatial working memory were observed after acute endotoxin or IFN-α therapy.

    “In addition, no significant effects of inflammation on visuospatial working memory were observed following either acute endotoxin (Grigoleit et al., 2010) nor following IFN-α therapy (Caraceni et al., 1998).”
  • Stroop performance was not impaired after low-dose (0.4 ng/mL) or high-dose (2.0 ng/mL) endotoxin administration.

    “Stroop performance was not impaired after endotoxin administration at either a low dose (0.4 ng/mL) (Grigoleit et al., 2010) or high dose (2.0 ng/mL) (van den Boogaard et al., 2010).”
  • Human experimental studies employing LPS-induced immune activation reported either increased, no, or decreased cognitive performance after LPS administration.

    “Experimental approaches in humans, employing lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced immune activation to investigate the effects of a peripheral inflammatory response on learning and memory reported either increased [24], no [25], [26], [27] or decreased [28] cognitive performance after LPS administration.”
  • Data in humans so far reported inconsistent results of experimental endotoxemia with a significant improvement or no effect on working memory.

    “However, data in humans so far reported inconsistent results of experimental endotoxemia with a significant improvement [24] or no effect on working memory [25], [27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grigoleit, J.-S., Oberbeck, J. R., Lichte, P., Kobbe, P., Wolf, O. T., Montag, T., Rey, A. D., Gizewski, E. R., Engler, H., & Schedlowski, M.
Affiliations
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Paul Ehrlich Institut (DE)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
Schedlowski, Manfred
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
561-567
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078960721
Cited by
59
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Universität Duisburg-Essen
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
lipopolysaccharide, endotoxemia, systemic immune activation, memory, cognitive function, attention, executive function, cytokines, neuroendocrine response, cortisol, norepinephrine, ACTH, interleukin-6, IL-10, TNF-α
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Cognition, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Immune System, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Values, Cytokines, Young Adult, Stroop Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review