Cited by 38Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionHallucinations in medical conditions

Lorazepam but not diazepam impairs identification of pictures on the basis of specific contour fragments

Open access
Wagemans, J., Notebaert, W., Boucart, Muriel·1998·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

We tested the effects of lorazepam 0.038 mg/kg and diazepam 0.3 mg/kg on the identification of pictures of everyday objects that were specifically modified to examine the role of different parts of the external contour. By pressing the space bar of a computer keyboard, observers could add 1% of the total contour of each picture until it was recognized. Identification thresholds were measured in three display conditions, depending on where along the contour the addition of contour pixels started. In the minima condition, stimuli were initially displayed with only minima (i.e., locations along the contour where negative curvature is strongest); all parts with negative curvature were then built up gradually from the minima and only later on were the fragments with positive curvature shown until the contour became closed at the maxima (i.e., locations where positive curvature is strongest). In the maxima condition, initially only the maxima were displayed, with all positive contour built up first and then the negative curvature until the minima were reached. In the inflections condition, the points along the contour shown first were inflections (i.e., points where curvature is locally zero because the sign of curvature changes there) and contour was built up by adding parts of positive and negative curvature at both sides of each inflection until the extrema (minima and maxima) were reached to close the contour of the picture. In general, picture identification was more difficult (i.e., a larger portion of the contour was required) in the minima condition than in the maxima and the inflections conditions. The diazepam group did not differ significantly from the placebo group, while the lorazepam group had significantly lower performance in all three display conditions. Results are discussed in relation to previous research showing impaired perceptual integration and impaired implicit memory under lorazepam influence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002130050678

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diazepam impairs explicit memory, but results regarding impairment of implicit memory by diazepam are mixed.

    “and although diazepam impairs explicit memory, results regarding impairment of implicit memory by diazepam are mixed (176-179).”
  • Although benzodiazepines generally affect memory, some studies show that effects differ depending on the benzodiazepine used.

    “Additionally, although BZDs are generally known to affect memory, some studies have shown that effects differ depending on the BZD used.”
  • Lorazepam appears to impair both explicit and implicit memory.

    “Lorazepam appears to impair both explicit memory and implicit memory”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Resnikoff H (1985) The illusion of reality: topics in information science. Springer, New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagemans, J., Notebaert, W., & Boucart, M.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1998-07-27
Volume
138
Issue
3-4
Pages
326-333
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W1977769023
Cited by
38
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
lorazepam, diazepam, benzodiazepines, image recognition, contour curvature, object recognition, perceptual integration, implicit memory, visual perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Diazepam, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Lorazepam, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review