Cited by 207Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesMultisensory perception and integrationBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Odor-induced changes in taste perception

Djordjevic, J., Zatorre, R. J., Jones-Gotman, M.·2004·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

We investigated odor-induced changes in taste perception (OICTP), by examining the influence of strawberry and soy sauce odors on perceived sweetness (Experiment 1) and saltiness (Experiment 2). We explored whether taste-smell interactions occur at the central level, by delivering odorants (strawberry, soy sauce, odorless water) and tastants (sucrose, sodium chloride) separately, and whether effects of imagined odors are comparable to those of physically presented odors. We found specific taste-smell interactions: sweetness enhancement induced by strawberry odor and saltiness enhancement induced by soy sauce odor. These interactions were elicited with separate delivery of olfactory and gustatory stimuli. Secondly, we found a similar but rather limited effect with the imagined odors: imagined strawberry enhanced perceived sweetness of water solutions, and imagined soy sauce enhanced perceived saltiness of weak sodium chloride solutions. We concluded that OICTP is a centrally mediated phenomenon, and that imagined odors can to some extent induce changes in perceived taste intensity comparable to those elicited by perceived odors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-004-2103-y

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Richardson A, Patterson Y (1986) An evaluation of three procedures for increasing imagery vividness. In: Sheikh AA (ed) International review of mental imagery, vol 2. Human Sciences Press, New York
  2. Shaffer G, Frank R (1990) An investigation of taste-smell interactions across four tastants and six odorants. Chem Senses 15:638
  3. Sugiyama H, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Kikuchi T (2003) Is olfactory mental image sensory-like? Chem Senses 28:76

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–207 of 207

Metadata

Authors
Djordjevic, J., Zatorre, R. J., & Jones-Gotman, M.
Affiliations
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Djordjevic, J.
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2004-10-20
Volume
159
Issue
3
Pages
405-408
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W1981233969
Cited by
207
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
McGill University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
perceived sweetness, taste perception, olfactory perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Odorants, Perception, Salts, Smell, Sucrose, Sweetening Agents, Taste, Taste Threshold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review