Cited by 360Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesMultisensory perception and integration

Taste-smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent

Frank, Robert A., Byram, Jennifer·1988·Chemical Senses

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to assess the nature of taste–smell interactions. In the first experiment, the ability of strawberry odor to modify the sweetness of sucrose was investigated. This was accomplished by having subjects rate the sweetness of whipped-cream stimuli with and without strawberry odor over time. The stimuli were swallowed to augment retronasal stimulation of the olfactory system. It was found that strawberry odor tended to enhance the maximal sweetness and total rating time of the stimuli. In the second experiment, it was found that peanut butter odor did not enhance sweetness, thus demonstrating that an odor's ability to enhance sweetness is odor-dependent, In the third experiment, it was demonstrated that strawberry odor did not enhance the saltiness of sodium chloride indicating that an odor's ability to enhance taste is tastant-dependent. In the fourth experiment, it was shown that 85% of the strawberry odorant's ability to enhance sweetness was eliminated by pinching the nostrils. This suggests that the influence of the strawberry odorant on sweetness was olfactory rather than gustatory. It was concluded that an odor's influence on taste is both odorant and tastant dependent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chemse/13.3.445

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The influence of strawberry aroma on sweetness is olfactory rather than gustatory in origin.

    “The strawberry aroma tended to enhance the perception of sweetness; the results also showed that an aroma's ability to enhance sweetness was aroma-dependent, that an aroma's ability to enhance taste was tastant-dependent, and that the influence of the strawberry aroma on sweetness was olfactory rather than gustatory in origin.”
  • An aroma's ability to enhance sweetness is aroma-dependent.

    “The strawberry aroma tended to enhance the perception of sweetness; the results also showed that an aroma's ability to enhance sweetness was aroma-dependent, that an aroma's ability to enhance taste was tastant-dependent, and that the influence of the strawberry aroma on sweetness was olfactory rather than gustatory in origin.”
  • An aroma's ability to enhance taste is tastant-dependent.

    “The strawberry aroma tended to enhance the perception of sweetness; the results also showed that an aroma's ability to enhance sweetness was aroma-dependent, that an aroma's ability to enhance taste was tastant-dependent, and that the influence of the strawberry aroma on sweetness was olfactory rather than gustatory in origin.”
  • Aromas such as caramel, vanilla, and berry flavours increase the perception of sweetness, at least in Western participants.

    “Aromas such as caramel, vanilla, and berry flavours have been found to increase the perception of sweetness, at least in Western participants (e.g., [2,44,45,93-100], see References [1,101] for reviews).”
  • Strawberry aroma tends to enhance the perception of sweetness.

    “The strawberry aroma tended to enhance the perception of sweetness; the results also showed that an aroma's ability to enhance sweetness was aroma-dependent, that an aroma's ability to enhance taste was tastant-dependent, and that the influence of the strawberry aroma on sweetness was olfactory rather than gustatory in origin.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frank, R. A., & Byram, J.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
Chemical Senses
Published
1988
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
445-455
ISSN
  • 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3553
OpenAlex
W1974345789
Cited by
359
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ohio Board of Regents
  • Louisiana Board of Regents
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
retronasal olfaction, sweetness enhancement, salty taste, sodium chloride

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review