Cited by 394Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesSensory Analysis and Statistical Methods

Confusing tastes and smells: How odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes

Stevenson, R. J.·1999·Chemical Senses

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between perception of an odour when smelled and the taste of a solution to which the odour is added as a flavorant. In Experiment 1 (E1) sweetness, sourness, liking and intensity ratings were obtained for 20 odours. Taste ratings were then obtained for sucrose solutions to which the odours had been added as flavorants. Certain odours were found to enhance tasted sweetness while others suppressed it. The degree to which an odour smelled sweet was the best predictor of the taste ratings. These findings were extended in Experiment 2 (E2), which included a second tastant, citric acid, and employed four odours from E1. The most sweet smelling odour, caramel, was found to suppress the sourness of citric acid and, as in E1, to enhance the sweetness of sucrose. Again, odours with low sweetness suppressed the sweetness of tasted sucrose. The study demonstrated that the effects of odours on taste perception are not limited to sweetness enhancement and apply to sour as well as sweet tastes. The overall pattern of results is consistent with an explanation of the taste properties of odours in terms of prior flavour-taste associations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chemse/24.6.627

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevenson, R. J.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Stevenson, R. J.
Venue
Chemical Senses
Published
1999-12-01
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
627-635
ISSN
  • 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3553
OpenAlex
W2152751997
Cited by
394
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Keywords
taste perception, sweetness enhancement, sucrose, citric acid, taste liking, odor intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Odorants, Perception, Smell, Taste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review