Cited by 293Multisensory perception and integrationOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

The role of congruency and pleasantness in odor-induced taste enhancement

Open access
Schifferstein, Hendrik N.J, Verlegh, Peeter W.J·1996·Acta Psychologica

Abstract

Although odorants and tastants are perceived by two different senses, the rated intensity of a tastant may increase if an odorant is added. The size of the odor-induced taste enhancement is said to depend on the perceptual similarity between the tastant and the odorant, and on the task instruction which affects subjects' working concepts of attribute categories. It is investigated whether congruency or pleasantness (halo-effects) can replace perceptual similarity in accounting for odor-induced taste enhancement. Sweetness intensity, pleasantness, and degree of congruency are determined for three sucrose/odorant combinations. Odor-induced enhancement is found only for congruent mixtures (sucrose/strawberry and sucrose/lemon). In addition, highly congruent mixtures are more pleasant than expected under additivity. The pleasantness judgments for incongruent combinations (sucrose/ham) follow a subtractive rule. The congruency ratings can account for a significant part of the pleasantness ratings, but not for the degree of sweetness enhancement. Also, the pleasantness ratings are not related to the degree of enhancement. Therefore, congruency or pleasantness ratings cannot replace similarity ratings in accounting for odor-induced taste enhancement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00040-2

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Verlegh, P. W. J.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Schifferstein, Hendrik N.J
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-10
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
87-105
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127801841
Cited by
293
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
crossmodal congruency, perceptual similarity, halo effect, taste pleasantness, sweetness intensity, sucrose, multisensory integration, additivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Psychophysics, Smell, Taste, Dietary Sucrose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review