Tail and eye movements evoked by electrical microstimulation of the optic tectum in goldfish
Abstract
This work studies the tail and eye co-ordinated movements evoked by the focal electrical stimulation of the tectum in goldfish. The aim of the study is to understand better those tectal sites and mechanisms that either remain functionally unaltered or are adaptively modified across vertebrates. Stimulation was applied in various tectal zones, and the characteristics of evoked tail and eye movements were examined as a function of the stimulation site over tectal surface and the stimulus parameters. Two types of response were electrically evoked: the former turned the body and the eyes contraversively towards the source of natural stimulus; the second produced initial ipsiversive turning of the body and eyes, followed by several tail beats. Evoking one or other response depended on both the site and parameters of stimulation, and responses were interpreted as orienting- and escape-like, respectively. Depending on the stimulation site, four different zones in the tectum were distinguished: in the medial zone the stimulus elicited eye and tail movements whose size increased with the distance to the rostral pole. The stimulation of the antero-medial zone evoked contraversive or ipsiversive eye saccades but tail movements were similar, irrespective of eye movements. Stimulation within the extreme antero-medial zone evoked convergent eye movements, and tail displacements turning the body either ipsiversively or contraversively. Stimulation of the posterior zone often evoked complex tail movements and pure horizontal eye saccades. Both orienting- and escape-like responses were also dependent on the stimulus parameters. The relationships between stimulus parameters and tail- and eye-orienting movement characteristics suggest that the velocity and duration might be encoded in different aspects of the tectal activity. Current strength also modified the number of tail beats that appeared during escape-like response. In conclusion, the present data suggest the involvement of the optic tectum not only in orienting but also in escape responses and that movements of eye and tail mediating such responses depend on the tectal active locus together with its level of activity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The optic tectum of teleosts receives sensory information mainly from multiple sensory modalities to form real-time representations of the animal surrounding, to identify significant stimuli, like preys or predators, and to trigger sensory guided responses.
“The optic tectum of teleosts receives sensory information mainly from multiple sensory modalities to form real-time representations of the animal surrounding, to identify significant stimuli, like preys, or potentially dangerous objects, as predators, and to trigger sensory guided responses.”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [131]
Electrical stimulation of the intermediate and deep layers of the optic tectum of goldfish triggers orienting responses consisting of coordinated eye and fin movements, axial musculature adjustments, and locomotion behavior that closely resemble natural orienting responses.
“Electrical stimulation of the intermediate and deep layers of the optic tectum of goldfish triggers orienting responses consisting of coordinated eye and fin movements, axial musculature adjustments, and locomotion behavior that closely resemble natural orienting responses”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [131]
The direction and amplitude of evoked orientation responses varied systematically with electrode position within the tectal lobe, indicating the presence of a spatially ordered motor map in the deep tectal layers, roughly in correspondence with the retinotopic visual map of the superficial layers, and suggesting that tectal evoked orientation responses are encoded in a body-centered reference框架.
“The direction and amplitude of the evoked orientation responses varied systematically with electrode position within the tectal lobe extend, indicating the presence of a spatially ordered motor map in the deep tectal layers, roughly in correspondence with the retinotopic visual map of the superficial layers, and suggesting that the tectal evoked orientation responses are encoded in a body-centered”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [131]
Cites
Tectal codification of eye movements in goldfish studied by electrical microstimulation
Salas, C., Herrero, L., Rodrı́guez, F., & Torres, B. (1997) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(97)83048-5 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationMeyer, D. L., Schott, D., & Schaefer, K. P. (1970) · Pfl�gers Archiv European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00592249 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current principles of motor control, with special reference to vertebrate locomotion
Grillner, S., & El Manira, A. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00015.2019 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Motor Functions of the Superior Colliculus
Gandhi, N. J., & Katnani, H. A. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113728 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Gahtan, E., Tanger, P., & Baier, H. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2678-05.2005 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Evolution of forebrain and spatial cognition in vertebrates: Conservation across diversity
Salas, C., Broglio, C., & Rodríguez, F. (2003) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000072438 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolution of behavioural control from chordates to primates
Cisek, P. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0522 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Merker, B. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00501 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Dissociation of place and cue learning by telencephalic ablation in goldfish.
López, J. C., Bingman, V. P., Rodríguez, F., Gómez, Y., & Salas, C. (2000) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.114.4.687 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationRheotaxis revisited: a multi-behavioral and multisensory perspective on how fish orient to flow
Coombs, S., Bak-Coleman, J., & Montgomery, J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.223008 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Spatio-temporal frequency characteristics of the optomotor response in zebrafish
Maaswinkel, H., & Li, L. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00395-4 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Fotowat, H., Lee, C., Jun, J. J., & Maler, L. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.44119 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms
Rodríguez, F., Quintero, B., Amores, L., Madrid, D., Salas-Peña, C., & Salas, C. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11082271 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationSankrithi, N. S., & O'Malley, D. M. (2010) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.003 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Control of a specific motor program by a small brain area in zebrafish
Fajardo, O., Zhu, P., & Friedrich, R. W. (2013) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2013.00067 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Herrero, L., Rodríguez, F., Salas, C., & Torres, B.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 1998-05-13
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-305
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- OpenAlex
- W2068363187
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- optic tectum, goldfish, electrical microstimulation, tail movement, eye movements, eye saccades, orienting response, escape behavior, stimulus parameters, current intensity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electric Stimulation, Escape Reaction, Eye Movements, Goldfish, Microelectrodes, Movement, Orientation, Superior Colliculi, Tail
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review