Cited by 100Visual perception and processing mechanismsVestibular and auditory disordersMotor Control and Adaptation

Tail and eye movements evoked by electrical microstimulation of the optic tectum in goldfish

Herrero, L., Rodríguez, F., Salas, C., Torres, B.·1998·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

This work studies the tail and eye co-ordinated movements evoked by the focal electrical stimulation of the tectum in goldfish. The aim of the study is to understand better those tectal sites and mechanisms that either remain functionally unaltered or are adaptively modified across vertebrates. Stimulation was applied in various tectal zones, and the characteristics of evoked tail and eye movements were examined as a function of the stimulation site over tectal surface and the stimulus parameters. Two types of response were electrically evoked: the former turned the body and the eyes contraversively towards the source of natural stimulus; the second produced initial ipsiversive turning of the body and eyes, followed by several tail beats. Evoking one or other response depended on both the site and parameters of stimulation, and responses were interpreted as orienting- and escape-like, respectively. Depending on the stimulation site, four different zones in the tectum were distinguished: in the medial zone the stimulus elicited eye and tail movements whose size increased with the distance to the rostral pole. The stimulation of the antero-medial zone evoked contraversive or ipsiversive eye saccades but tail movements were similar, irrespective of eye movements. Stimulation within the extreme antero-medial zone evoked convergent eye movements, and tail displacements turning the body either ipsiversively or contraversively. Stimulation of the posterior zone often evoked complex tail movements and pure horizontal eye saccades. Both orienting- and escape-like responses were also dependent on the stimulus parameters. The relationships between stimulus parameters and tail- and eye-orienting movement characteristics suggest that the velocity and duration might be encoded in different aspects of the tectal activity. Current strength also modified the number of tail beats that appeared during escape-like response. In conclusion, the present data suggest the involvement of the optic tectum not only in orienting but also in escape responses and that movements of eye and tail mediating such responses depend on the tectal active locus together with its level of activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002210050403

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The optic tectum of teleosts receives sensory information mainly from multiple sensory modalities to form real-time representations of the animal surrounding, to identify significant stimuli, like preys or predators, and to trigger sensory guided responses.

    “The optic tectum of teleosts receives sensory information mainly from multiple sensory modalities to form real-time representations of the animal surrounding, to identify significant stimuli, like preys, or potentially dangerous objects, as predators, and to trigger sensory guided responses.”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [131]

  • Electrical stimulation of the intermediate and deep layers of the optic tectum of goldfish triggers orienting responses consisting of coordinated eye and fin movements, axial musculature adjustments, and locomotion behavior that closely resemble natural orienting responses.

    “Electrical stimulation of the intermediate and deep layers of the optic tectum of goldfish triggers orienting responses consisting of coordinated eye and fin movements, axial musculature adjustments, and locomotion behavior that closely resemble natural orienting responses”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [131]

  • The direction and amplitude of evoked orientation responses varied systematically with electrode position within the tectal lobe, indicating the presence of a spatially ordered motor map in the deep tectal layers, roughly in correspondence with the retinotopic visual map of the superficial layers, and suggesting that tectal evoked orientation responses are encoded in a body-centered reference框架.

    “The direction and amplitude of the evoked orientation responses varied systematically with electrode position within the tectal lobe extend, indicating the presence of a spatially ordered motor map in the deep tectal layers, roughly in correspondence with the retinotopic visual map of the superficial layers, and suggesting that the tectal evoked orientation responses are encoded in a body-centered”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [131]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herrero, L., Rodríguez, F., Salas, C., & Torres, B.
Affiliations
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
1998-05-13
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
291-305
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2068363187
Cited by
100
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
optic tectum, goldfish, electrical microstimulation, tail movement, eye movements, eye saccades, orienting response, escape behavior, stimulus parameters, current intensity
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Escape Reaction, Eye Movements, Goldfish, Microelectrodes, Movement, Orientation, Superior Colliculi, Tail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review