Cited by 490Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 178 of the 178 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motor Functions of the Superior Colliculus

Open access
Gandhi, Neeraj J., Katnani, Husam A.·2011·Annual Review of Neuroscience

Abstract

The mammalian superior colliculus (SC) and its nonmammalian homolog, the optic tectum, constitute a major node in processing sensory information, incorporating cognitive factors, and issuing motor commands. The resulting action—to orient toward or away from a stimulus—can be accomplished as an integrated movement across oculomotor, cephalomotor, and skeletomotor effectors. The SC also participates in preserving fixation during intersaccadic intervals. This review highlights the repertoire of movements attributed to SC function and analyzes the significance of results obtained from causality-based experiments (microstimulation and inactivation). The mechanisms potentially used to decode the population activity in the SC into an appropriate movement command are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113728

Cites

178 of 178 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gandhi NJ, 2004, The Visual Neurosciences, 1449
  2. Munoz DP, 1989, Rev. Neurol., 145, 567

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gandhi, N. J., & Katnani, H. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Published
2011-07-21
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
205-231
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
OpenAlex
W2150156359
Cited by
490
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 28
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY015485, P30EY008098)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (P30-DC0025205)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM081760)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
superior colliculus, optic tectum, eye movements, head movement, saccades, fixation, motor control, oculomotor system, microstimulation, inactivation, sensorimotor integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Eye Movements, Humans, Models, Biological, Movement, Oculomotor Muscles, Psychomotor Performance, Superior Colliculi, Vibrissae, Vocalization, Animal, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review