Cited by 403Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBiofuel production and bioconversion

Nutrient limitation as a strategy for increasing starch accumulation in microalgae

Open access
Dragone, Giuliano, Fernandes, Bruno D., Abreu, Ana P., Vicente, António A., Teixeira, José A.·2011·Applied Energy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.03.012

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tetraselmis subcordiformis, Chlamydomonas rheinhardtii and Chlorella vulgaris have higher starch content (30-49%) than other microalgae.

    “Species including Tetraselmis subcordiformis, Chlamydomonas rheinhardtii and Chlorella vulgaris comparatively have higher starch content (30-49%) than other microalgae (Dragone et al., 2011;Yao et al., 2012).”

    From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Dragone et al., 2011

  • Starch content in microalgal species ranges from 7% to 45%.

    “the content of starch -a readily digestibile carbohydrate in microalgal species ranges from 7% to 45% (Dragone et al., 2011).”

    From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Dragone et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dragone, G., Fernandes, B. D., Abreu, A. P., Vicente, A. A., & Teixeira, J. A.
Affiliations
Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (PT)
Corresponding author
Dragone, Giuliano
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
88
Issue
10
Pages
3331-3335
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142508046
Cited by
403
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/44724/2008)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
nutrient limitation, Chlorella vulgaris, nitrogen starvation, urea, iron limitation, third-generation bioethanol, two-stage cultivation, cell growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review