Cited by 746Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adhesion mechanisms mediated by probiotics and prebiotics and their potential impact on human health

Open access

Abstract

Adhesion ability to the host is a classical selection criterion for potential probiotic bacteria that could result in a transient colonisation that would help to promote immunomodulatory effects, as well as stimulate gut barrier and metabolic functions. In addition, probiotic bacteria have a potential protective role against enteropathogens through different mechanisms including production of antimicrobial compounds, reduction of pathogenic bacterial adhesion and competition for host cell binding sites. The competitive exclusion by probiotic bacteria has a beneficial effect not only on the gut but also in the urogenital tract and oral cavity. On the other hand, prebiotics may also act as barriers to pathogens and toxins by preventing their adhesion to epithelial receptors. In vitro studies with different intestinal cell lines have been widely used along the last decades to assess the adherence ability of probiotic bacteria and pathogen antagonism. However, extrapolation of these results to in vivo conditions still remains unclear, leading to the need of optimisation of more complex in vitro approaches that include interaction with the resident microbiota to address the current limitations. The aim of this mini review is to provide a comprehensive overview on the potential effect of the adhesive properties of probiotics and prebiotics on the host by focusing on the most recent findings related with adhesion and immunomodulatory and antipathogenic effect on human health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00253-019-09978-7

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Schematic representation of antiadhesive properties of probiotics and prebiotics. (A) pathogens, probiotic and bacterial toxins adhere to cell surface oligosaccharides carried on glycolipids and glycoproteins; (B) prebiotic oligosaccharides, particularly galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) have some structural similarity to cell surface glycoproteins and are postulated to inhibit adhesion of toxins and pathogens to cells; (C) the adhesion of probiotic bacteria to cell surface receptors is postulated to inhibit adhesion of toxins and pathogens to those receptors
Fig. 1 Schematic representation of antiadhesive properties of probiotics and prebiotics. (A) pathogens, probiotic and bacterial toxins adhere to cell surface oligosaccharides carried on glycolipids and glycoproteins; (B) prebiotic oligosaccharides, particularly galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) have some structural similarity to cell surface glycoproteins and are postulated to inhibit adhesion of toxins and pathogens to cells; (C) the adhesion of probiotic bacteria to cell surface receptors is postulated to inhibit adhesion of toxins and pathogens to those receptorsCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 98 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hymes JP, Johnson BR, Barrangou R, Klaenhammer TR (2016) Functional analysis of an S-layer-associated fibronectin-binding protein in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:2676–2685. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00024-16 · DOI
  2. Meyer DP, Tungland BC, Causey JL, Slavin JL (2000) The immune effects of inulin in vitro and in vivo. Agro Food Ind HiTech 11:18–20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–746 of 746

Metadata

Authors
Monteagudo-Mera, A., Rastall, R. A., Gibson, G. R., Charalampopoulos, D., & Chatzifragkou, A.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Monteagudo-Mera, Andrea
  • Chatzifragkou, Afroditi
Venue
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2019-07-02
Volume
103
Issue
16
Pages
6463-6472
ISSN
  • 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0614
OpenAlex
W2954311903
Cited by
743
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Reading
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
probiotics, prebiotics, bacterial adhesion, competitive exclusion, immunomodulation, intestinal barrier, antimicrobial agents, urogenital tract, oral cavity, resident microbiota, human health
MeSH terms
Antibiosis, Bacterial Adhesion, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Immunologic Factors, Probiotics, Prebiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review