Cited by 11Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingProtein purification and stability

In vitro affinity maturation of antibody against membrane-bound GPCR molecules

Open access
Wang, Jie, An, Lili, Zhao, Yun, Zhang, Cheng, Li, Shengnan, Ye, Chen, Jing, Shuqian, Hang, Haiying·2019·Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as seven-transmembrane domain receptors, are among the most important targets against which many small molecule drugs have been developed. However, only two antibody drugs targeting GPCRs have been approved for clinical use although many antibody drugs against non-GPCR protein targets have been successfully developed for various disease indications. One of the challenges for developing anti-GPCR drugs is the high difficulty to perform affinity maturation due to their insolubility in aqueous solutions. To address this issue, CHO cell display libraries of single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) and full-length antibodies were maturated directly against vesicle probes prepared from CHO cells displaying the endothelin A receptor (ETaR) GPCR. The probe in the vesicle form ensures the physiological conformation and functional activity of the protein and avoids issues with membrane protein insolubility. The size of the vesicle had a clear effect on protein-ligand interaction; we used small-sized vesicles with low expression levels of GPCRs for the affinity maturation. Four rounds of affinity maturation combining vesicles as probes with the CHO cell display platform improved affinity by 13.58-fold for scFvs and 5.05-fold for full-length antibodies. We expect that this method will not only be used for the affinity maturation of antibodies against GPCRs but will also be used to mature antibodies for other types of proteins where the conformation/activity of which depends on the proper membrane environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00253-019-10030-x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro affinity maturation methods, such as random mutagenesis with display technologies, improve antibody binding against target proteins but are time consuming and labor intensive.

    “In vitro affinity maturation methods, such as random mutagenesis with display technologies, has been shown to improve antibody binding against target proteins, but such approaches are time consuming and labor intensive (27–32).”
  • Conventional in vitro affinity maturation usually takes a long time with poor efficiency due to its small library content, incompatible optimization for multiple goals, and other technical obstacles.

    “The conventional in vitro affinity maturation usually takes a long time with poor efficiency due to its small library content, incompatible optimization for multiple goals, and other technical obstacles (32, 49).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., An, L., Zhao, Y., Zhang, C., Li, S., Ye, C., Jing, S., & Hang, H.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jing, Shuqian
  • Hang, Haiying
Venue
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2019-07-29
Volume
103
Issue
18
Pages
7703-7717
ISSN
  • 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0614
OpenAlex
W2965717316
Cited by
11
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Development of Ministry of Science and Technology (2014CB910402)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31870923)
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFF0205404)
  • Beijing Science and Technology Project (Z181100003818023)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
affinity maturation, G protein-coupled receptors, membrane proteins, antibody drug development, scFv, ETA receptor, protein-ligand interactions, membrane protein conformation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibody Affinity, Cricetulus, Ligands, Molecular Conformation, CHO Cells, Receptor, Endothelin A, Single-Chain Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review