Cited by 237CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesTransgenic Plants and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia × hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins

Subburaj, Saminathan, Chung, Sung Jin, Lee, Choongil, Ryu, Seuk-Min, Kim, Duk Hyoung, Kim, Jin-Soo, Bae, Sangsu, Lee, Geung-Joo·2016·Plant Cell Reports

DOI 10.1007/s00299-016-1937-7

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Key message Site-directed mutagenesis of nitrate reductase genes using direct delivery of purified Cas9 protein preassembled with guide RNA produces mutations efficiently in Petunia × hybrida protoplast system. The clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-CRISPR associated endonuclease 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system has been recently announced as a powerful molecular breeding tool for site-directed mutagenesis in higher plants. Here, we report a site-directed mutagenesis method targeting Petunia nitrate reductase (NR) gene locus. This method could create mutations efficiently using direct delivery of purified Cas9 protein and single guide RNA (sgRNA) into protoplast cells. After transient introduction of RNA-guided endonuclease (RGEN) ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) with different sgRNAs targeting NR genes, mutagenesis at the targeted loci was detected by T7E1 assay and confirmed by targeted deep sequencing. T7E1 assay showed that RGEN RNPs induced site-specific mutations at frequencies ranging from 2.4 to 21 % at four different sites (NR1, 2, 4 and 6) in the PhNR gene locus with average mutation efficiency of 14.9 ± 2.2 %. Targeted deep DNA sequencing revealed mutation rates of 5.3-17.8 % with average mutation rate of 11.5 ± 2 % at the same NR gene target sites in DNA fragments of analyzed protoplast transfectants. Further analysis from targeted deep sequencing showed that the average ratio of deletion to insertion produced collectively by the four NR-RGEN target sites (NR1, 2, 4, and 6) was about 63:37. Our results demonstrated that direct delivery of RGEN RNPs into protoplast cells of Petunia can be exploited as an efficient tool for site-directed mutagenesis of genes or genome editing in plant systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00299-016-1937-7

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering
Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · Cited by 5,762
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A., & Barbas, C. F. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · Cited by 3,820
CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes
Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2842 · Cited by 3,153
Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system
Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., & Joung, J. K. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2501 · Cited by 2,937
Cas-OFFinder: A fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases
Bae, S., Park, J., & Kim, J.-S. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048 · Cited by 2,339
Self-citation
Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew
Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Shan, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Gao, C., & Qiu, J.-L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2969 · Cited by 2,072
Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease
Cho, S. W., Kim, S., Kim, J. M., & Kim, J.-S. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2507 · Cited by 1,863
Self-citation
Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins
Kim, S., Kim, D., Cho, S. W., Kim, J., & Kim, J.-S. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.171322.113 · Cited by 1,856
Self-citation
Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system
Shan, Q., Wang, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Liang, Z., Zhang, K., Liu, J., Xi, J. J., Qiu, J.-L., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2650 · Cited by 1,810

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Cocking EC, Peberdy JF (1974) The use protoplasts from fungi and higher plants as genetic systems—a practical handbook. Department of Botany, University of Nottingham, Nottingham

Sorted by citations

CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture
Chen, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, H., & Gao, C. (2019) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049 · Cited by 1,696
Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes
Svitashev, S. K., Schwartz, C., Lenderts, B., Young, J. K., & Cigan, A. M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13274 · Cited by 841
DNA-Free Genetically Edited Grapevine and Apple Protoplast Using CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins
Malnoy, M., Viola, R., Jung, M., Koo, O. J., Kim, S., Kim, J., Velasco, R., & Kanchiswamy, C. N. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01904 · Cited by 766
Self-citation
CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing
Manghwar, H., Lindsey, K., Zhang, X., & Jin, S. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.006 · Cited by 529
Latest Developed Strategies to Minimize the Off-Target Effects in CRISPR-Cas-Mediated Genome Editing
Naeem, M., Majeed, S., Hoque, M. Z., & Ahmad, I. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9071608 · Cited by 457
Strategies in the delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing
Zhang, S., Shen, J., Li, D., & Cheng, Y. (2021) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.47007 · Cited by 430
Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities
Li, L., Hu, S., & Chen, X. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.031 · Cited by 415
The emerging and uncultivated potential of CRISPR technology in plant science
Zhang, Y., Malzahn, A. A., Sretenovic, S., & Qi, Y. (2019) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0461-5 · Cited by 414
Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System
Arora, L., & Narula, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01932 · Cited by 412
DNA-free two-gene knockout in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins
Baek, K., Kim, D. H., Jeong, J., Sim, S. J., Melis, A., Kim, J., Jin, E., & Bae, S. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep30620 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing
Gupta, D., Bhattacharjee, O., Mandal, D., Sen, M. K., Dey, D., Dasgupta, A., Kazi, T. A., Gupta, R. K., Sinharoy, S., Acharya, K., et al. (2019) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116636 · Cited by 351
Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR
Malzahn, A. A., Lowder, L. G., & Qi, Y. (2017) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-017-0148-4 · Cited by 288
Precision genome editing in plants: state-of-the-art in CRISPR/Cas9-based genome engineering
Wada, N., Ueta, R., Osakabe, Y., & Osakabe, K. (2020) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-020-02385-5 · Cited by 279
Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins
Liang, Z., Chen, K., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Yin, K., Qiu, J., & Gao, C. (2018) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2017.145 · Cited by 238
Principles, Applications, and Biosafety of Plant Genome Editing Using CRISPR-Cas9
El‐Mounadi, K., Morales-Floriano, M. L., & García-Ruíz, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00056 · Cited by 231
CRISPR–Cas9-mediated genome editing in apple and grapevine
Osakabe, Y., Liang, Z., Ren, C., Nishitani, C., Osakabe, K., Wada, M., Komori, S., Malnoy, M., Velasco, R., Poli, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0067-9 · Cited by 214
First report of CRISPR/cas9 mediated dna-free editing of 4cl and rve7 genes in chickpea protoplasts
Badhan, S., Ball, A. S., & Mantri, N. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22010396 · Cited by 193
DNA-Free Genome Editing: Past, Present and Future
Metje‐Sprink, J., Menz, J., Modrzejewski, D., & Sprink, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01957 · Cited by 196
Genome Editing in Plants: Exploration of Technological Advancements and Challenges
Vats, S., Kumawat, S., Kumar, V., Patil, G., Joshi, T., Sonah, H., Sharma, T. R., & Deshmukh, R. K. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells8111386 · Cited by 195
DNA-Free Genome Editing of Brassica oleracea and B. rapa Protoplasts Using CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complexes
Murovec, J., Guček, K., Bohanec, B., Avbelj, M., & Jerala, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01594 · Cited by 189
An efficient DNA- and selectable-marker-free genome-editing system using zygotes in rice
Toda, E., Koiso, N., Takebayashi, A., Ichikawa, M., Kiba, T., Osakabe, K., Osakabe, Y., Sakakibara, H., Kato, N., & Okamoto, T. (2019) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0386-z · Cited by 188
The CRISPR/Cas9 system and its applications in crop genome editing
Bao, A., Burritt, D. J., Chen, H., Zhou, X., Cao, D., & Tran, L.-S. P. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2018.1554621 · Cited by 185
A method for the production and expedient screening of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated non-transgenic mutant plants
Chen, L., Li, W., Katin‐Grazzini, L., Ding, J., Gu, X., Li, Y., Gu, T., Wang, R., Lin, X., Deng, Z., et al. (2018) · Horticulture Research · doi:10.1038/s41438-018-0023-4 · Cited by 189
Protoplast Regeneration and Its Use in New Plant Breeding Technologies
Reed, K. M., & Bargmann, B. O. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2021.734951 · Cited by 173
Reduced fire blight susceptibility in apple cultivars using a high‐efficiency CRISPR/Cas9‐FLP/FRT‐based gene editing system
Pompili, V., Costa, L. D., Piazza, S., Pindo, M., & Malnoy, M. (2019) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13253 · Cited by 171
Patterns of CRISPR/Cas9 activity in plants, animals and microbes
Bortesi, L., Zhu, C., Zischewski, J., Pérez, L., Bassié, L., Nadi, R., Forni, G., Lade, S. B., Soto, E., Jin, X., et al. (2016) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12634 · Cited by 167
CRISPR ribonucleoprotein-mediated genetic engineering in plants
Zhang, Y., Iaffaldano, B. J., & Qi, Y. (2021) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100168 · Cited by 169
From classical mutagenesis to nuclease‐based breeding – directing natural DNA repair for a natural end‐product
Pacher, M., & Puchta, H. (2016) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13469 · Cited by 152
Anthocyanins in Floral Colors: Biosynthesis and Regulation in Chrysanthemum Flowers
Mekapogu, M., Vasamsetti, B. M. K., Kwon, O.-K., Ahn, M.-S., Lim, S., & Jung, J. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21186537 · Cited by 120
Lipofection-mediated genome editing using DNA-free delivery of the Cas9/gRNA ribonucleoprotein into plant cells
Liu, W., Rudis, M. R., Cheplick, M. H., Millwood, R. J., Yang, J., Ondzighi‐Assoume, C. A., Montgomery, G. A., Burris, K. P., Mazarei, M., Chesnut, J. D., et al. (2019) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-019-02488-w · Cited by 118
Simultaneous targeting of duplicated genes in Petunia protoplasts for flower color modification via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins
Yu, J., Tu, L., Subburaj, S., Bae, S., & Lee, G.-J. (2020) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-020-02593-1 · Cited by 114
Self-citation
Strategies to Increase On-Target and Reduce Off-Target Effects of the CRISPR/Cas9 System in Plants
Hajiahmadi, Z., Movahedi, A., Wei, H., Li, D., Orooji, Y., Ruan, H., & Zhuge, Q. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20153719 · Cited by 112
Applications of CRISPR/Cas to Improve Crop Disease Resistance: Beyond Inactivation of Susceptibility Factors
Schenke, D., & Cai, D. (2020) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101478 · Cited by 116
Challenges Facing CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing in Plants
Son, S., & Park, S. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.902413 · Cited by 113
Improving Nutritional and Functional Quality by Genome Editing of Crops: Status and Perspectives
Ku, H.-K., & Ha, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.577313 · Cited by 105
Optimization of protoplast regeneration in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Jeong, Y. Y., Lee, H.-Y., Kim, S. W., Noh, Y., & Seo, P. J. (2021) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/s13007-021-00720-x · Cited by 99
CRISPR/Cas9: An RNA‐guided highly precise synthetic tool for plant genome editing
Demirci, Y., Zhang, B., & Ünver, T. (2017) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.25970 · Cited by 103
New variants of CRISPR RNA‐guided genome editing enzymes
Murovec, J., Pirc, Ž., & Yang, B. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12736 · Cited by 102
CRISPR-Based Genome Editing Tools: Insights into Technological Breakthroughs and Future Challenges
Mushtaq, M., Dar, A. A., Skalický, M., Tyagi, A., Bhagat, N., Basu, U., Bhat, B. A., Zaid, A., Ali, S., Dar, T. U. H., et al. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12060797 · Cited by 100
CRISPR-Cas9 System for Plant Genome Editing: Current Approaches and Emerging Developments
Montecillo, J. A. V., Chu, L. L., & Bae, H. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10071033 · Cited by 99
Generation of the transgene-free canker-resistant Citrus sinensis using Cas12a/crRNA ribonucleoprotein in the T0 generation
Su, H., Wang, Y., Xu, J. H., Omar, A. A., Grosser, J. W., Ćalović, M., Zhang, L., Yu, F., Vakulskas, C. A., & Wang, N. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39714-9 · Cited by 87
Transgene-free Genome Editing in Plants
Gu, X., Liu, L., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2021.805317 · Cited by 88
Genome editing and plant transformation of solanaceous food crops
Eck, J. M. V. (2017) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.012 · Cited by 88
Development of Improved Fruit, Vegetable, and Ornamental Crops Using the CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technique
Corte, L. E.-D., Mahmoud, L. M., Moraes, T. D. S., Mou, Z., Grosser, J. W., & Dutt, M. (2019) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants8120601 · Cited by 90
Genome editing in crop improvement: Present scenario and future prospects
Miglani, G. S. (2017) · Journal of Crop Improvement · doi:10.1080/15427528.2017.1333192 · Cited by 86
DNA-free genome editing in grapevine using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes followed by protoplast regeneration
Najafi, S., Bertini, E., Erica D’Incà, Fasoli, M., & Zenoni, S. (2022) · Horticulture Research · doi:10.1093/hr/uhac240 · Cited by 83
New traits in crops produced by genome editing techniques based on deletions
van de Wiel, C. C. M., Schaart, J. G., Lotz, L. A. P., & Smulders, M. J. M. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-017-0425-z · Cited by 80
Targeted modification of plant genomes for precision crop breeding
Hilscher, J., Buerstmayr, H., & Stöger, E. (2016) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201600173 · Cited by 79
Efficient genome editing of rubber tree (hevea brasiliensis) protoplasts using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins
Fan, Y., Xin, S., Dai, X., Yang, X., Huang, H., & Hua, Y. (2020) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112146 · Cited by 77
PEG-Delivered CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins System for Gene-Editing Screening of Maize Protoplasts
Sant’Ana, R. R. A., Caprestano, C. A., Nodari, R. O., & Agapito-Tenfen, S. Z. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11091029 · Cited by 78
Advances in application of genome editing in tomato and recent development of genome editing technology
Xia, X., Cheng, X., Li, R., Yao, J., Li, Z., & Cheng, Y. (2021) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-021-03874-3 · Cited by 78
Perspectives of CRISPR/Cas-mediated cis-engineering in horticulture: unlocking the neglected potential for crop improvement
Li, Q., Sapkota, M., & van der Knaap, E. (2020) · Horticulture Research · doi:10.1038/s41438-020-0258-8 · Cited by 73
DNA-free genome editing methods for targeted crop improvement
Kanchiswamy, C. N. (2016) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-016-1982-2 · Cited by 76
Genome editing technology and application in soybean improvement
Bao, A., Zhang, C., Huang, Y., Chen, H., Zhou, X., & Cao, D. (2020) · Oil Crop Science · doi:10.1016/j.ocsci.2020.03.001 · Cited by 68
Genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 in Pinus radiata (D. Don)
Poovaiah, C. R., Phillips, L., Geddes, B., Reeves, C., Sorieul, M., & Thorlby, G. J. (2021) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-021-03143-x · Cited by 67
Plant Virus-Derived Vectors for Plant Genome Engineering
Mahmood, M. A., Naqvi, R. Z., Rahman, S. U., Amin, I. U., & Mansoor, S. (2023) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v15020531 · Cited by 72
Novel Plant Breeding Techniques Shake Hands with Cereals to Increase Production
Haroon, M., Zafar, M. M., Farooq, M. A., Afzal, R., Batool, M., Idrees, F., Babar, U., Khan, A. S., 默辉娟, Li, L., et al. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11081052 · Cited by 70
CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture
Távora, F. T. P. K., Diniz, F. D. A. D. S., Rêgo-Machado, C. M., Freitas, N. C., Arraes, F. B. M., de Andrade, E. C., Furtado, L. L., Osiro, K. O., de Sousa, N. L., Cardoso, T. B., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.913728 · Cited by 73
Genome Editing in Agriculture: Technical and Practical Considerations
Jansing, J., Schiermeyer, A., Schillberg, S., Fischer, R., & Bortesi, L. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20122888 · Cited by 66
Nanoparticles for protein delivery in planta
Wang, J., Cunningham, F. J., Goh, N. S., Boozarpour, N. N., Pham, M., & Landry, M. P. (2021) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102052 · Cited by 64
Towards mastering CRISPR-induced gene knock-in in plants: Survey of key features and focus on the model Physcomitrella patens
Collonnier, C., Guyon‐Debast, A., Maclot, F., Mara, K., Charlot, F., & Nogué, F. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.04.024 · Cited by 62
Genome editing reagent delivery in plants
Ghogare, R., Ludwig, Y., Bueno, G. M., Slamet-Loedin, I. H., & Dhingra, A. (2021) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-021-00239-w · Cited by 61
Genome Editing Technology for Genetic Amelioration of Fruits and Vegetables for Alleviating Post-Harvest Loss
Kumari, C., Sharma, M., Kumar, V., Sharma, R., Kumar, V., Sharma, P., Kumar, P., & Irfan, M. (2022) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering9040176 · Cited by 60
Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for targeted mutagenesis, gene replacement and stacking of genes in higher plants
Luo, M., Gilbert, B., & Ayliffe, M. (2016) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-016-1989-8 · Cited by 60
Efficient genome editing using CRISPR–Cas9 RNP delivery into cabbage protoplasts via electro-transfection
Lee, M. H., Lee, J., Choi, S. A., Kim, Y., Koo, O. J., Choi, S. H., Ahn, W. S., Jie, E. Y., & Kim, S. W. (2020) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-020-00645-2 · Cited by 59
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in plants
Liu, X., Xie, C., Si, H., & Yang, J. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.03.009 · Cited by 63
Genome engineering in ornamental plants: Current status and future prospects
Kishi‐Kaboshi, M., Aida, R., & Sasaki, K. (2018) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.015 · Cited by 59
Genes and genome editing tools for breeding desirable phenotypes in ornamentals
Giovannini, A., Laura, M., Nesi, B., Savona, M. R., & Cardi, T. (2021) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-020-02632-x · Cited by 55
Current insights and advances into plant male sterility: new precision breeding technology based on genome editing applications
Farinati, S., Draga, S., Betto, A., Palumbo, F., Vannozzi, A., Lucchin, M., & Barcaccia, G. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1223861 · Cited by 55
Heritability of targeted gene modifications induced by plant-optimized CRISPR systems
Mao, Y., Botella, J. R., & Zhu, J. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2380-1 · Cited by 55
Non-GM Genome Editing Approaches in Crops
Gong, Z., Cheng, M., & Botella, J. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2021.817279 · Cited by 54
Regeneration of plants from embryogenic callus-derived protoplasts of Garganega and Sangiovese grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
Bertini, E., Tornielli, G. B., Pezzotti, M., & Zenoni, S. (2019) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-019-01619-1 · Cited by 53
DNA-free genome editing with preassembled CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins in plants
Park, J., & Choe, S. (2019) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-019-00136-3 · Cited by 51
Protoplast technology in ornamental plants: Current progress and potential applications on genetic improvement
Naing, A. H., Adedeji, O. S., & Kim, C. K. (2021) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110043 · Cited by 51
Concerns regarding ‘off-target’activity of genome editing endonucleases
Kadam, U. S., Shelake, R. M., Chavhan, R. L., & Suprasanna, P. (2018) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.027 · Cited by 47
Genome Engineering Technology for Durable Disease Resistance: Recent Progress and Future Outlooks for Sustainable Agriculture
Ali, Q., Yu, C., Hussain, A., Ali, M., Ahmar, S., Sohail, M. A., Riaz, M., Ashraf, M. F., Abdalmegeed, D., Wang, X., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.860281 · Cited by 53
Putting CRISPR-Cas system in action: a golden window for efficient and precise genome editing for crop improvement
Tariq, A., Mushtaq, M., Yaqoob, H., Bhat, B. A., Zargar, S. M., Raza, A., Ali, S., Charagh, S., Mubarik, M. S., Zaman, Q. U., et al. (2023) · GM Crops & Food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2023.2219111 · Cited by 45
Recent advancements in CRISPR/Cas technology for accelerated crop improvement
Das, D., Singha, D. L., Paswan, R. R., Chowdhury, N., Sharma, M., Reddy, P. S., & Chikkaputtaiah, C. (2022) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-022-03894-3 · Cited by 50
CRISPR/Cas9 and Nanotechnology Pertinence in Agricultural Crop Refinement
Naik, B. J., Shimoga, G. D., Kim, S.-C., Manjulatha, M., Palem, R. R., Palem, R. R., Kumar, M., Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.843575 · Cited by 46
Tomato protoplasts as cell target for ribonucleoprotein (RNP)-mediated multiplexed genome editing
Nicolia, A., Andersson, M., Hofvander, P., Festa, G., & Cardi, T. (2020) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-020-01954-8 · Cited by 44
Strategic transgene-free approaches of CRISPR-based genome editing in plants
Bhattacharjee, S., Bhowmick, R., Kant, L., & Paul, K. (2023) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-023-01998-3 · Cited by 43
Progress and Challenges in the Improvement of Ornamental Plants by Genome Editing
Ahn, C. H., Ramya, M., An, H. R., Park, P. M., Kim, Y.-J., Lee, S. Y., & Jang, S. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9060687 · Cited by 45
Protoplast Isolation and Shoot Regeneration from Protoplast-Derived Callus of Petunia hybrida Cv. Mirage Rose
Kang, H. H., Naing, A. H., & Kim, C. K. (2020) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology9080228 · Cited by 43
Delivery of CRISPR/Cas Components into Higher Plant Cells for Genome Editing
Кулуев, Б. Р., Гумерова, Г. Р., Mikhaylova, E. V., Геращенков, Г. А., Rozhnova, N. A., Vershinina, Z. R., Khyazev, A. V., Matniyazov, R. T., Baymiev, A. K., Baymiev, A. K., et al. (2019) · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1134/s102144371905011x · Cited by 41
Phytoremediation and sequestration of soil metals using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology to modify plants: a review
Bhattacharyya, N., Anand, U., Kumar, R. S., Ghorai, M., Aftab, T., Jha, N. K., Rajapaksha, A. U., Bundschuh, J., Bontempi, E., & Dey, A. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01474-1 · Cited by 42
CRISPR/Cas genome editing in plants: mechanisms, applications, and overcoming bottlenecks
Hwarari, D., Radani, Y., Ke, Y., Chen, J., & Yang, L. (2024) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-024-01314-1 · Cited by 42
Application and development of genome editing technologies to the Solanaceae plants
Yamamoto, T., Kashojiya, S., Kamimura, S., Kameyama, T., Ariizumi, T., Ezura, H., & Miura, K. (2018) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.019 · Cited by 40
Plant biomacromolecule delivery methods in the 21st century
Rustgi, S., Naveed, S., Windham, J., Zhang, H., & Demirer, G. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.1011934 · Cited by 37
Biolistic Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 with Ribonucleoprotein Complex in Wheat
Liang, Z., Chen, K., & Gao, C. (2019) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8991-1_24 · Cited by 36
Plant-based engineering for production of high-valued natural products
Sirirungruang, S., Markel, K., & Shih, P. M. (2022) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/d2np00017b · Cited by 35
Raising Climate-Resilient Crops: Journey From the Conventional Breeding to New Breeding Approaches
Gaba, Y., Pareek, A., & Singla-Pareek, S. L. (2021) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/1389202922666210928151247 · Cited by 35
Genome editing for improving nutritional quality, post-harvest shelf life and stress tolerance of fruits, vegetables, and ornamentals
Sharma, P., Pandey, A., Malviya, R., Dey, S., Karmakar, S., & Gayen, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2023.1094965 · Cited by 36
Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in Plants
Banakar, R., Schubert, M. S., Kurgan, G., Mohan, K., Beaudoin, S. F., Collingwood, M. A., Vakulskas, C. A., Wang, K., & Zhang, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2021.760820 · Cited by 32
Targeted genome editing in polyploids: lessons from Brassica
Ahmad, N., Fatima, S., Mehmood, M. A., Zaman, Q. U., Atif, R. M., Zhou, W., Rahman, M., & Gill, R. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1152468 · Cited by 31
Inducible CRISPR genome-editing tool: classifications and future trends
Dai, X., Chen, X., Fang, Q., Li, J., & Bai, Z. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2017.1378999 · Cited by 32
Establishment of targeted mutagenesis in soybean protoplasts using CRISPR/Cas9 RNP delivery via electro−transfection
Subburaj, S., & Agapito-Tenfen, S. Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1255819 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Genome Editing as A Versatile Tool to Improve Horticultural Crop Qualities
Chen, Y., Mao, W., Liu, T., Feng, Q., Li, L., & Li, B. (2020) · Horticultural Plant Journal · doi:10.1016/j.hpj.2020.11.004 · Cited by 29
Advancements in plant transformation: from traditional methods to cutting-edge techniques and emerging model species
Levengood, H., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, C. (2024) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-024-03359-9 · Cited by 29
Development of an efficient protoplast isolation and transfection system for castor bean (Ricinus communis L.)
Bai, L., Cheng, Y., She, J., He, Z., Liu, H., Zhang, G., Cao, R., & Chen, Y. (2020) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-020-01932-0 · Cited by 27
Genome Editing: Revolutionizing the Crop Improvement
Saurabh, S. (2021) · Plant Molecular Biology Reporter · doi:10.1007/s11105-021-01286-7 · Cited by 30

Authors: Subburaj, S., Chung, S. J., Lee, C., Ryu, S.-M., Kim, D. H., Kim, J.-S., Bae, S., & Lee, G.-J.
Affiliations: Chungnam National University (KR)
Seoul National University (KR)
Hanyang University (KR)
Corresponding author: Bae, Sangsu
Lee, Geung-Joo
ORCID: Subburaj, Saminathan
Chung, Sung Jin
Kim, Jin-Soo
Bae, Sangsu
Lee, Geung-Joo
Venue: Plant Cell Reports
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2016-01-29
Volume: 35
Issue: 7
Pages: 1535-1544
ISSN: 0721-7714 (ISSN-L)
1432-203X
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-016-1937-7
OpenAlex: W2469880247
Cited by: 237
References: 55
Citations by year: 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12
FWCI: 11.09
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Plant Cell Reports (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Transgenic Plants and Applications
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9, site-directed mutagenesis, Petunia hybrida, protoplast transformation, nitrate reductase, single guide RNA, ribonucleoprotein delivery, mutation efficiency, plant genome editing
MeSH terms: Base Sequence, Genetic Engineering, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Genetic, Plant Proteins, Protoplasts, Recombinant Proteins, Ribonucleoproteins, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Genome, Plant, Petunia, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia × hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks