The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Solanum tuberosum GBSSI gene: a target for assessing gene and base editing in tetraploid potato
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Key message The StGBSSI gene was successfully and precisely edited in the tetraploid potato using gene and base-editing strategies, leading to plants with impaired amylose biosynthesis. Genome editing has recently become a method of choice for basic research and functional genomics, and holds great potential for molecular plant-breeding applications. The powerful CRISPR-Cas9 system that typically produces double-strand DNA breaks is mainly used to generate knockout mutants. Recently, the development of base editors has broadened the scope of genome editing, allowing precise and efficient nucleotide substitutions. In this study, we produced mutants in two cultivated elite cultivars of the tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) using stable or transient expression of the CRISPR-Cas9 components to knock out the amylose-producing StGBSSI gene. We set up a rapid, highly sensitive and cost-effective screening strategy based on high-resolution melting analysis followed by direct Sanger sequencing and trace chromatogram analysis. Most mutations consisted of small indels, but unwanted insertions of plasmid DNA were also observed. We successfully created tetra-allelic mutants with impaired amylose biosynthesis, confirming the loss of function of the StGBSSI protein. The second main objective of this work was to demonstrate the proof of concept of CRISPR-Cas9 base editing in the tetraploid potato by targeting two loci encoding catalytic motifs of the StGBSSI enzyme. Using a cytidine base editor (CBE), we efficiently and precisely induced DNA substitutions in the KTGGL-encoding locus, leading to discrete variation in the amino acid sequence and generating a loss-of-function allele. The successful application of base editing in the tetraploid potato opens up new avenues for genome engineering in this species.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The gene and base-editing strategies has precisely edited granule bound starch synthase gene (StGBSSI) gene in the tetraploid potato and with impaired amylose biosynthesis (Veillet et al., 2019).”
From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Veillet et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces
Untergasser, A., Cutcutache, I., Kõressaar, T., Ye, J., Faircloth, B., Remm, M., & Rozen, S. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks596 · Cited by 9,165
Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis
Yoo, S.-D., Cho, Y.-H., & Sheen, J. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.199 · Cited by 5,104
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Šali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.3 · Cited by 4,404
Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage
Gaudelli, N. M., Komor, A. C., Rees, H. A., Packer, M. S., Badran, A. H., Bryson, D. I., & Liu, D. R. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24644 · Cited by 4,184
Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures
Shen, M., & Šali, A. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062416606 · Cited by 2,294
Haeussler, M., Schönig, K., Eckert, H., Eschstruth, A., Mianné, J., Renaud, J.-B., Schneider-Maunoury, S., Shkumatava, A., Teboul, L., Kent, J., et al. (2016) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2 · Cited by 1,756
Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity
Hu, J. H., Miller, S. M., Geurts, M. H., Tang, W., Chen, L., Sun, N., Zeina, C. M., Gao, X., Rees, H. A., Lin, Z., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature26155 · Cited by 1,552
Krieger, E., Joo, K., Lee, J., Lee, J., Raman, S., Thompson, J., Tyka, M., Baker, D. A., & Karplus, K. J. (2009) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22570 · Cited by 1,396
Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems
Nishida, K., Arazoe, T., Yachie, N., Banno, S., Kakimoto, M., Tabata, M., Mochizuki, M., Miyabe, A., Araki, M., Hara, K. Y., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf8729 · Cited by 1,349
Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease
Anders, C., Niewoehner, O., Duerst, A., & Jinek, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13579 · Cited by 1,323
The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond
Bortesi, L., & Fischer, R. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006 · Cited by 1,289
Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors
Lemoine, R., Camera, S. L., Atanassova, R., Dédaldéchamp, F., Allario, T., Pourtau, N., Bonnemain, J., Laloi, M., Coutos‐Thévenot, P., Maurousset, L., et al. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00272 · Cited by 1,241
DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins
Woo, J. W., Kim, J., Kwon, S. I., Corvalán, C., Cho, S. W., Kim, H., Kim, S.-G., Kim, S.-T., Choe, S., & Kim, J.-S. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3389 · Cited by 1,219
Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space
Nishimasu, H., Shi, X., Ishiguro, S., Gao, L., Hirano, S., Okazaki, S., Noda, T., Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Mori, H., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9129 · Cited by 1,100
Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants
Zeeman, S. C., Kossmann, J., & Smith, A. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112301 · Cited by 1,095
Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes
Liang, Z., Chen, K., Li, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, Q., Liu, J., Zhang, H., Liu, C., Ran, Y., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14261 · Cited by 987
Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion
Zong, Y., Wang, Y., Li, C., Zhang, R., Chen, K., Ran, Y., Qiu, J., Wang, D., & Gao, C. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3811 · Cited by 896
Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion
Shimatani, Z., Kashojiya, S., Takayama, M., Terada, R., Arazoe, T., Ishii, H., Teramura, H., Yamamoto, T., Komatsu, H., Miura, K., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3833 · Cited by 812
Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion
Nekrasov, V., Wang, C., Win, J., Lanz, C., Weigel, D., & Kamoun, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00578-x · Cited by 769
Fauser, F., Schiml, S., & Puchta, H. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12554 · Cited by 733
Peng, A., Chen, S., Lei, T., Xu, L., He, Y., Liu, W., Yao, L., & Zou, X. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12733 · Cited by 732
Demirer, G. S., Zhang, H., Matos, J. L., Goh, N. S., Cunningham, F. J., Sung, Y., Chang, R., Aditham, A. J., Chio, L., Cho, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0382-5 · Cited by 674
Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice
Jin, S., Zong, Y., Gao, Q., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Qin, P., Liang, C., Wang, D., Qiu, J.-L., Zhang, F., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw7166 · Cited by 665
The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution
Puchta, H. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri025 · Cited by 603
Andersson, M., Turesson, H., Nicolia, A., Fält, A., Samuelsson, M., & Hofvander, P. (2016) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-016-2062-3 · Cited by 540
CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated DNA-free plant genome editing
Kim, H., Kim, S., Ryu, J., Kang, B., Kim, J., & Kim, S. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14406 · Cited by 519
Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion
Li, C., Zong, Y., Wang, Y., Jin, S., Zhang, D., Song, Q., Zhang, R., & Gao, C. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1443-z · Cited by 507
CRISPR/Cas9 Platforms for Genome Editing in Plants: Developments and Applications
Ma, X., Zhu, Q., Chen, Y., & Liu, Y. (2016) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2016.04.009 · Cited by 497
Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A
Zong, Y., Song, Q., Li, C., Jin, S., Zhang, D., Wang, Y., Qiu, J., & Gao, C. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4261 · Cited by 440
Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement
Krishna, H., Alizadeh, M., Singh, D., Singh, U., Chauhan, N., Eftekhari, M., & Sadh, R. K. (2016) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-016-0389-7 · Cited by 436
Genome editing in potato via CRISPR‐Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery
Andersson, M., Turesson, H., Olsson, N., Fält, A., Ohlsson, P., González, M. N., Samuelsson, M., & Hofvander, P. (2018) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.12731 · Cited by 435
Improving cold storage and processing traits in potato through targeted gene knockout
Clasen, B. M., Stoddard, T., Luo, S. J., Demorest, Z. L., Li, J., Cédrone, F., Tibebu, R., Davison, S., Ray, E. E., Daulhac, A., et al. (2015) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12370 · Cited by 414
Pan, C., Ye, L., Li, Q., Liu, X., He, Y., Wang, J., Chen, L., & Lu, G. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24765 · Cited by 391
Veillet, F., Perrot, L., Chauvin, L., Kermarrec, M.-P., Guyon‐Debast, A., Chauvin, J.-É., Nogué, F., & Mazier, M. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20020402 · Cited by 370
Self-citationCapture of genomic and T‐DNA sequences during double‐strand break repair in somatic plant cells
Salomon, S., & Puchta, H. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.20.6086 · Cited by 356
Statistical potentials for fold assessment
Melo, F., Sánchez, R., & Šali, A. (2002) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.110430 · Cited by 349
Butler, N., Baltes, N. J., Voytas, D. F., & Douches, D. S. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01045 · Cited by 337
Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment
John, B. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg460 · Cited by 315
Tang, X. D., Liu, G., Zhou, J., Ren, Q., You, Q., Tian, L., Xin, X., Zhong, Z., Liu, B., Zheng, X., et al. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1458-5 · Cited by 313
Engineering herbicide-resistant watermelon variety through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing
Tian, S., Jiang, L., Cui, X., Zhang, J., Guo, S., Li, M., Zhang, H., Ren, Y., Gong, G., Zong, M., et al. (2018) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-018-2299-0 · Cited by 307
Precision genome engineering through adenine base editing in plants
Kang, B., Yun, J., Kim, S., Shin, Y., Ryu, J., Choi, M., Woo, J. W., & Kim, J. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0178-x · Cited by 306
Inference of CRISPR Edits from Sanger Trace DataPreprint
Hsiau, T., Conant, D., Rossi, N., Maures, T. J., Waite, K., Yang, J. L., Joshi, S., Kelso, R., Holden, K., Enzmann, B. L., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/251082 · Cited by 302
Leveraging Rules of Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay for Genome Engineering and Personalized Medicine
Popp, M. W., & Maquat, L. E. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.053 · Cited by 293
Visser, R. G. F., Somhorst, I., Kuipers, G. J., Ruys, N. J., Feenstra, W. J., & Jacobsen, E. (1991) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf00269861 · Cited by 289
Roldán, I., Wattebled, F., Lucas, M. M., Delvallé, D., Planchot, V., Jiménez, S., Pérez, R., Ball, S. G., d’Hulst, C., & Mérida, Á. (2007) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02968.x · Cited by 283
Efficient targeted mutagenesis in potato by the CRISPR/Cas9 system
Wang, S., Zhang, S., Wang, W., Xiong, X., Meng, F., & Cui, X. (2015) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-015-1816-7 · Cited by 275
Steinert, J., Schiml, S., Fauser, F., & Puchta, H. (2015) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13078 · Cited by 261
Use of CRISPR systems in plant genome editing: toward new opportunities in agriculture
Ricroch, A., Clairand, P., & Harwood, W. (2017) · Emerging Topics in Life Sciences · doi:10.1042/etls20170085 · Cited by 252
Adaptation in CRISPR-Cas Systems
Sternberg, S. H., Richter, H., Charpentier, E., & Qimron, U. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.030 · Cited by 251
Butler, N., Atkins, P., Voytas, D. F., & Douches, D. S. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144591 · Cited by 250
Precise A·T to G·C Base Editing in the Rice Genome
Hua, K., Tao, X., Yuan, F., Wang, D., & Zhu, J. (2018) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.007 · Cited by 232
Progress in understanding the biosynthesis of amylose
Ball, S. G., de Wal, M. H. B. J. V., & Visser, R. G. F. (1998) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(98)01342-9 · Cited by 224
Isolation of an amylose-free starch mutant of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
Hovenkamp-Hermelink, J., Jacobsen, E., Ponstein, A. S., Visser, R. G. F., Vos‐Scheperkeuter, G. H., Bijmolt, E. W., de Vries, J. N., Witholt, B., & Feenstra, W. J. (1987) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00249167 · Cited by 216
Expanding the base editing scope in rice by using Cas9 variants
Hua, K., Tao, X., & Zhu, J. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12993 · Cited by 214
Highly Efficient A·T to G·C Base Editing by Cas9n-Guided tRNA Adenosine Deaminase in Rice
Yan, F., Kuang, Y., Ren, B., Wang, J., Zhang, D., Lin, H., Yang, B., Zhou, X., & Zhou, H. (2018) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.008 · Cited by 205
Delvallé, D., Dumez, S., Wattebled, F., Roldán, I., Planchot, V., Berbezy, P., Colonna, P., Vyas, D., Chatterjee, M., Ball, S. G., et al. (2005) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02462.x · Cited by 195
Chen, L., Li, W., Katin‐Grazzini, L., Ding, J., Gu, X., Li, Y., Gu, T., Wang, R., Lin, X., Deng, Z., et al. (2018) · Horticulture Research · doi:10.1038/s41438-018-0023-4 · Cited by 189
Bastet, A., Zafirov, D., Giovinazzo, N., Guyon‐Debast, A., Nogué, F., Robaglia, C., & Gallois, J. (2019) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13096 · Cited by 189
Self-citationGenome editing in plants by engineered CRISPR–Cas9 recognizing NG PAM
Endo, M., Mikami, M., Endo, A., Kaya, H., Itoh, T., Nishimasu, H., Nureki, O., & Toki, S. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0321-8 · Cited by 186
Gelatinization and Pasting Properties of Waxy and Non‐waxy Rice Starches
Park, I., Ibáñez, A. M., Zhong, F., & Shoemaker, C. F. (2007) · Starch - Stärke · doi:10.1002/star.200600570 · Cited by 181
Applications of New Breeding Technologies for Potato Improvement
Hameed, A., Zaidi, S. S., Shakir, S., & Mansoor, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00925 · Cited by 173
Kuipers, A., Jacobsen, E., & Visser, R. G. F. (1994) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.6.1.43 · Cited by 166
Accelerated ex situ breeding of GBSS - and PTST1 -edited cassava for modified starch
Bull, S. E., Seung, D., Chanez, C., Mehta, D., Kuon, J., Truernit, E., Hochmuth, A., Zurkirchen, I., Zeeman, S. C., Gruissem, W., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat6086 · Cited by 166
Mechanism of Starch Biosynthesis
de Fekete, M. A. R., Leloir, L. F., & Cardini, C. E. (1960) · Nature · doi:10.1038/187918a0 · Cited by 141
Regeneration of Solanum tuberosum Plants from Protoplasts Induces Widespread Genome Instability
Fossi, M., Amundson, K., Kuppu, S., Britt, A., & Comai, L. (2019) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.18.00906 · Cited by 138
Transforming plant biology and breeding with CRISPR /Cas9, Cas12 and Cas13
Schindele, P., Wolter, F., & Puchta, H. (2018) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.13073 · Cited by 110
xC as9 expands the scope of genome editing with reduced efficiency in rice
Wang, J., Meng, X., Hu, X., Sun, T., Li, J., Wang, K., & Yu, H. J. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13053 · Cited by 88
Precision breeding for novel starch variants in potato
Muth, J. R., Hartje, S., Twyman, R. M., Hofferbert, H.-R., Tacke, E., & Prüfer, D. (2008) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00340.x · Cited by 87
Starches—from current models to genetic engineering
Sonnewald, U., & Koßmann, J. (2012) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12029 · Cited by 87
Potato starch synthases: Functions and relationships
Firouzabadi, F. N., & Visser, R. G. F. (2017) · Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.02.004 · Cited by 76
Veillet, F., Gaillard, C., Coutos‐Thévenot, P., & Camera, S. L. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01899 · Cited by 73
Self-citationA novel selection system for potato transformation using a mutated AHAS gene
Andersson, M., Trifonova, A., Andersson, A.-B., Johansson, M., B�low, L., & Hofvander, P. (2003) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-003-0684-8 · Cited by 65
Helle, S., Bray, F., Verbeke, J., Flament, S., Courseaux, A., Facon, M., Tokarski, C., Rolando, C. H., & Szydlowski, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00746 · Cited by 57
Self-citationCutting Edge Genetics: CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of Plant Genomes
Soyars, C. L., Peterson, B. A., Burr, C. A., & Nimchuk, Z. L. (2018) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcy079 · Cited by 50
Cheng, J. S., Khan, M. A., Qiu, W., Li, J., Zhou, H., Zhang, Q., Guo, W., Zhu, T., Peng, J. H., Sun, F., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030088 · Cited by 49
A Dual sgRNA Approach for Functional Genomics in Arabidopsis thaliana
Pauwels, L., Clercq, R. D., Goossens, J., Iñigo, S., Williams, C. J., Ron, M., Britt, A., & Goossens, A. (2018) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.118.200046 · Cited by 38
Masson, J., Lecerf, M., Rousselle, P., Perennec, P., & Pelletier, G. (1987) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/0168-9452(87)90127-0 · Cited by 31
The U6 small nuclear RNA gene family of potato
Guérineau, F., & Waugh, R. (1993) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00027367 · Cited by 13
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors
Molla, K. A., Sretenovic, S., Bansal, K. C., & Qi, Y. (2021) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00991-1 · Cited by 387
González, M. N., Massa, G. A., Andersson, M., Turesson, H., Olsson, N., Fält, A., Storani, L., Oneto, C. A. D., Hofvander, P., & Feingold, S. E. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01649 · Cited by 285
Targeted genome-modification tools and their advanced applications in crop breeding
Li, B., Sun, C., Li, J., & Gao, C. (2024) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-024-00720-2 · Cited by 269
Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in Crop Quality Improvement
Liu, Q., Yang, F., Zhang, J., Liu, H., Rahman, S., Islam, S., Ma, W., & She, M. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22084206 · Cited by 239
Development of Plant Prime-Editing Systems for Precise Genome Editing
Xu, R., Li, J., Liu, X., Shan, T., Qin, R., & Wei, P. (2020) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100043 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Veillet, F., Chauvin, L., Kermarrec, M.-P., Sevestre, F., Merrer, M., Terret, Z., Szydlowski, N., Devaux, P., Gallois, J.-L., & Chauvin, J.-E.
- Affiliations
- Institut Agro Rennes-Angers (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Génétique et amélioration des fruits et légumes (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Veillet, Florian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Plant Cell Reports
- Published
- 2019-05-17
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1065-1080
- ISSN
- 0721-7714 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-203X
- OpenAlex
- W2942972964
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant Cell Reports (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion)
- LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-BTBR-0001_GENIUS)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Keywords
- tetraploid potato, potato, CRISPR/Cas9 base editing, amylose biosynthesis, starch synthase, loss-of-function mutants, high-resolution melting analysis, genome editing, molecular breeding
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Alleles, Solanum tuberosum, Starch Synthase, Tetraploidy, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
