Cited by 339Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsSex and Gender in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 20 of the 42 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and common neuropathologies of aging

Open access

Abstract

Alzheimer’s dementia is significantly more common in women than in men. However, few pathological studies have addressed sex difference in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other brain pathologies. We leveraged postmortem data from 1453 persons who participated in one of two longitudinal community-based studies of older adults, the Religious Orders Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Postmortem examination identified AD pathologies, neocortical Lewy bodies, DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), hippocampal sclerosis, gross and micro infarcts, atherosclerosis, arteriolosclerosis, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Linear and logistic regressions examined the association of sex with each of the pathologic measures. Two-thirds of subjects were women (n = 971; 67%), with a mean age at death of 89.8 (SD = 6.6) years in women and 87.3 (SD = 6.6) in men. Adjusted for age and education, women had higher levels on a global measure of AD pathology (estimate = 0.102, SE = 0.022, p < 0.001), and tau tangle density in particular (estimate = 0.334, SE = 0.074, p < 0.001), and there was a borderline difference between women and men in amyloid-β load (estimate = 0.124, SE = 0.065, p = 0.056). In addition, compared to men, women were more likely to have more severe arteriolosclerosis (OR = 1.28, 95% CI:1.04–1.58, p = 0.018), and less likely to have gross infarcts (OR = 0.78, 95% CI:0.61–0.98, p = 0.037), although the association with gross infarct was attenuated after controlling for vascular risk factors. These data help elucidate the neuropathologic footprint of sex difference in AD and other common brain pathologies of aging.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 1,453 autopsies from two community-based aging cohorts, women had more Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, especially tau tangle density, and more severe arteriolosclerosis than men. These differences were not explained by age, APOE ε4, menopause type, or hormone replacement therapy.

Key findings

  • Among 1,453 deceased participants (971 women, 67%; mean age at death 89.8 years in women vs. 87.3 in men), women had higher global AD pathology after adjustment for age and education (estimate=0.102, SE=0.022, p<0.001) and higher tau tangle density (estimate=0.334, SE=0.074, p<0.001); Aβ load was borderline (estimate=0.124, SE=0.065, p=0.056).
  • More than 60% met pathologic criteria for AD, with a higher percentage in women (68%) than men (58%); women were 35% more likely to have a pathologic AD diagnosis (OR=1.35, 95% CI:1.06–1.72).
  • Women were more likely to have severe arteriolosclerosis (OR=1.28, 95% CI:1.04–1.58, p=0.018) and less likely to have gross infarcts (OR=0.78, 95% CI:0.61–0.98, p=0.037), though the gross infarct association attenuated after controlling for vascular risk factors (OR=0.80, 95% CI:0.63–1.02, p=0.072).
  • No sex differences were found for neocortical Lewy bodies, TDP-43, hippocampal sclerosis, microinfarcts, atherosclerosis, or cerebral amyloid angiopathy; no interaction was found between sex and APOE ε4, and both natural- and surgical-menopause women had higher AD pathology than men.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional postmortem analysis of 1,453 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project, two longitudinal community-based cohorts of older adults without dementia at entry; follow-up exceeded 90% and autopsy rate exceeded 85%.
  • Neuropathologic evaluation included immunohistochemistry and stereology for tau tangle density and Aβ load across 8 cortical regions, a global AD pathology score from Bielschowsky silver-stained neuritic plaques, diffuse plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles, plus assessments of Lewy bodies, TDP-43, hippocampal sclerosis, infarcts, atherosclerosis, arteriolosclerosis, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy.
  • Linear and logistic regressions adjusted for age and education examined sex associations, with additional models for age and APOE ε4 interactions, menopause type/age, hormone replacement therapy, vascular risk factors, and cohort; analyses used SAS version 9.4.

Limitations

  • The paper states participants had higher education levels and more than 95% were Caucasian, reducing generalizability; tau measures described only neuronal, not astrocytic, tau burden and lacked aging-related tau astrogliopathy data; contribution of primary age-related tauopathy or AD subtypes was unknown; only single-epitope fibrillary Aβ and helical filament tau were quantified; and autopsy was limited to one hemisphere.
  • Evident from the text: the cross-sectional autopsy design cannot establish causality or temporal ordering, and the cohort composition may limit generalizability to more diverse or clinically referred populations.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00401-018-1920-1

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

20 of 42 cited sources checked · 13 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 50 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 29
45 of 45

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 339

Metadata

Authors
Oveisgharan, S., Arvanitakis, Z., Yu, L., Farfel, J., Schneider, J. A., & Bennett, D. A.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Oveisgharan, Shahram
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
2018-10-17
Volume
136
Issue
6
Pages
887-900
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2897712355
Cited by
330
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 2
FWCI
15.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01AG17917, P30AG10161, RO1NS084965, R01AG15819)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, sex differences, tau tangles, amyloid-beta, arteriolosclerosis, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Lewy bodies, TDP-43, hippocampal sclerosis, cerebral infarction, atherosclerosis, postmortem brain examination, Religious Orders Study, Rush Memory and Aging Project
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Autopsy, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Sex Characteristics, Chi-Square Distribution, tau Proteins, Arteriolosclerosis, alpha-Synuclein, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-18, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-18 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review