Cited by 70Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF NEURITIC PLAQUES AND NEUROFIBRILLARY TANGLES IN AN AUTOPSY POPULATION

DeWOLFE MILLER, F., HICKS, SAMUEL P., D'AMATO, CONSTANCE J., LANDIS, J. RICHARD·1984·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

From July 1, 1980 to December 2, 1982, all individuals at autopsy at the University of Michigan Medical Center greater than or equal to 65 years of age and selected individuals less than 65 years of age were examined for neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Sections of the hippocampal, parahippocampal temporal gyrus, and fusiform gyrus were examined. In a total population of 199, each individual was classified as having none, few, or many of each lesion. The frequency of the joint presence of many plaques and tangles increased monotonically after age 71 years. There was no significant difference in the joint distribution of these lesions with sex or race. There was a strong correlation between the presence of one lesion and the other; the correlation for the two lesions was similar for males and females, but for blacks, it was significantly higher than for non-blacks. The distribution of these lesions in autopsy populations may be useful in identifying other related hypothetical risk factors for dementia of Alzheimer's type.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113897

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few studies have directly investigated the association between sex and AD and other common neuropathologies, and these had small sample sizes (less than 200 brain autopsies) or did not examine pathologies other than AD.

    “Yet, to date, only a few studies have directly investigated the association between sex and AD and other common neuropathologies. Further, these included only a small sample size (less than 200 brain autopsies) [41,53], or did not examine pathologies other than AD [41,43,53].”
  • Few if any previous studies that investigated the association of sex with AD pathologies have examined menopausal factors.

    “Few if any of the previous studies which investigated the association of sex with AD pathologies have examined menopausal factors [25,41,43,53].”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeWOLFE MILLER, F., HICKS, S. P., D'AMATO, C. J., & LANDIS, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1984-09
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
331-341
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2144810614
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, hippocampus, fusiform gyrus, sex differences, racial differences, risk factors, autopsy findings
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Alzheimer Disease, Autopsy, Black or African American, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Michigan, Middle Aged, Neurofibrils, Sex Factors, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review