Cited by 643Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsSex and Gender in Healthcare

Sex Differences in the Clinical Manifestations of Alzheimer Disease Pathology

Barnes, Lisa L., Wilson, Robert S., Bienias, Julia L., Schneider, Julie A., Evans, Denis A., Bennett, David A.·2005·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

Context Sex differences in risk of clinically diagnosed Alzheimer disease (AD) have been studied extensively, but little is known about the relation of the pathologic indices of AD to the clinical manifestations of the disease in men compared with women. Objective To test whether the relation of AD pathology to the clinical manifestations of the disease differs in men and women. Design Longitudinal, clinicopathologic cohort study. Participants and setting Analyses were conducted on 141 older Catholic clergy members who underwent detailed annual clinical evaluations and brain autopsy at death. The number of neuritic plaques, diffuse plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles in a 1-mm2 area sampled from 4 cortical regions was counted, and a global measure of AD pathology (range, 0-2.98 U) and specific measures of each pathology were derived. Main outcome measures Clinical diagnosis of probable AD and level of global cognitive function at the last evaluation before death. Results Women had more global AD pathology than did men (P = .04), due primarily to more neurofibrillary tangles (P = .02). At the last evaluation before death, 57 persons met clinical criteria for probable AD (34 [60%] of them women). In logistic regression models, sex was not related to odds of clinical AD (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-3.25), but the relation of global AD pathology to clinical diagnosis differed for men and women. Each additional unit of AD pathology was associated wit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.685

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women develop greater neurofibrillary degeneration, brain parenchymal loss, and cognitive decline.

    “Recent studies suggest that women develop greater neurofibrillary degeneration, brain parenchymal loss, and cognitive decline.52,53,54”

    From Sex differences in cognitive decline among US adults (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

  • In earlier work, women had more AD pathology and neurofibrillary tangles in particular, but not neuritic or diffuse plaques, among 141 subjects who came to autopsy.

    “Also, in earlier work, we found that women had more AD pathology and neurofibrillary tangles in particular, but not neuritic or diffuse plaques, among 141 subjects who came to autopsy [8].”
  • The association of Alzheimer's disease pathology with clinical manifestations is more significant in women than in men.

    “The association of AD pathology with clinical manifestations of the disease is also more significant in women than men [4].”
  • Women with Alzheimer's disease show faster brain volume loss than men.

    “Women with AD show greater cognitive vulnerability to AD pathology, steeper rates of cognitive decline, and faster brain volume loss than men do [4, 5].”
  • Women with Alzheimer's disease show greater cognitive vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease pathology than men.

    “Women with AD show greater cognitive vulnerability to AD pathology, steeper rates of cognitive decline, and faster brain volume loss than men do [4, 5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, L. L., Wilson, R. S., Bienias, J. L., Schneider, J. A., Evans, D. A., & Bennett, D. A.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
685
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042778267
Cited by
643
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 24
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30-AG 10161, R01 AG15819, R01AG015819, P30AG010161, KO8 AG00849, K08AG000849)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, sex differences, neuropathology, clinical features, neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic plaques, diffuse plaques, dementia, cognitive function, brain autopsy, clinicopathological correlation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Female, Genotype, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Lewy Body Disease, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review