Cited by 254Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

Cognitive impairment in 873 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease: Results from the German Study on Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease with Dementia (GEPAD)

Open access
Riedel, O., Klotsche, J., Spottke, A., Deuschl, G., Förstl, H., Henn, F., Heuser, I., Oertel, W. +5 more·2008·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background Parkinson's disease (PD) is often accompanied by non-motor complications, such as dementia, depression, and psychotic symptoms, which worsen the prognosis and increase the personal and socioeconomic burden of disease. Prevalence estimates of these complications are quite variable and are lacking for the outpatient care sector. Methods As part of a larger, nationwide, cross-sectional epidemiological study in n = 315 neurological outpatient settings in Germany, this paper estimates the frequency of dementia and cognitive impairment in n = 873 outpatients meeting the UK Brain Bank criteria for idiopathic PD. Assessments were based on a clinical interview and neuropsychological assessments, including the Hoehn & Yahr rating and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Cognitive impairment was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Parkinson Neuropsychometric Dementia Assessment (PANDA) and the clinician's diagnosis of dementia was based on the diagnostic criteria of DSMIV. Results Using standardized cutoff scores, the prevalence of cognitive impairment in the study sample as measured by various methods was 17.5% by MMSE (< or = 24), 41.8% by CDT (> or = 3), 43.6% by PANDA (< or = 14), and 28.6% met the DSM-IV criteria for dementia. All estimates increased with age and PD severity. Gender was an inconsistent contributor while illness duration had no significant impact on cognition. Multiple regression analyses revealed PD severity to be the strongest predictor of dementia risk (OR = 4.3; 95% CI: 2.1-9.1), while neuropsychiatric syndromes had independent, although modest additional contributions (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.6-3.8). Conclusion Estimates of cognitive impairment and dementia in PD patients are largely dependent on the diagnostic measure used. Using established clinical diagnostic standards for dementia the overall rate on routine outpatient neurological care is 28.6%, but using more sensitive neuropsychological measures, rates for cognitive impairment might be up to 2-fold higher. The MMSE revealed strikingly low sensitivity. Neuropsychiatric syndromes, in addition to PD severity and age, have an independent--although modest--additional contribution to patients' risk for cognitive impairment and dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-008-0720-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disease severity has been reported as the strongest predictor of dementia risk in Parkinson's disease.

    “and disease severity has been reported as the strongest predictor of dementia risk (Riedel et al. 2008).”

    From The clinical symptoms of Parkinson's disease. (2016) · cites this paper as Riedel et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riedel, O., Klotsche, J., Spottke, A., Deuschl, G., Förstl, H., Henn, F., Heuser, I., Oertel, W., Reichmann, H., Riederer, P., Trenkwalder, C., Dodel, R., & Wittchen, H.-U.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Paracelsus Elena Klinik Kassel (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2008-01-22
Volume
255
Issue
2
Pages
255-264
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2163559546
Cited by
254
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
FWCI
15.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, cognitive impairment, dementia, prevalence, non-motor symptoms, neuropsychiatric syndromes, disease severity, Mini-Mental State Examination, clock drawing test, diagnostic sensitivity, age as risk factor
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Cognition Disorders, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Dementia, Depressive Disorder, Education, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Parkinson Disease, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review