Cited by 156Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Cardiorespiratory synchronization during Zen meditation.

Cysarz, Dirk, Büssing, Arndt·2005·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The impact of meditation on cardiorespiratory synchronization with respect to breathing oscillations and the modulations of heart rate induced by respiration (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA) was investigated in this study. Four different exercises (spontaneous breathing, mental task, Zen meditation, and Kinhin meditation) were consecutively performed by nine subjects mainly without any experience in meditation. An electrocardiogram and a respiratory trace were recorded simultaneously. On this basis the degree of cardiorespiratory synchronization was quantified by a technique which has been adopted from the analysis of weakly coupled chaotic oscillators. Both types of meditation showed a high degree of synchronization, whereas heartbeat and respiration were hardly synchronized during spontaneous breathing. During the mental task exercise the extent of synchronization was slightly higher than during spontaneous breathing. These results were largely determined by the breathing frequency because the two types of meditation induce low breathing frequencies which led to a pronounced and in-phase RSA. During the meditation the low breathing frequencies led to a decrease in the high frequency of heart rate variability, whereas the low frequency and the extent of RSA increased. The heart rate primarily reflected the degree of physical effort. The high degree of cardiorespiratory synchronization during meditation in unexperienced meditators suggests that the physiological implications of meditation does not require prior experience in meditation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-005-1379-3

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cysarz, D., & Büssing, A.
Affiliations
Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Corresponding author
Cysarz, Dirk
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2005-06-07
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
88-95
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W1995023224
Cited by
154
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
cardiorespiratory synchronization, Zen meditation, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, meditation experience, physical exertion, cognitive tasks
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Biological Clocks, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Pulmonary Ventilation, Statistics as Topic, Respiratory Mechanics, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review