Cited by 26Thermoregulation and physiological responsesPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Mood and selective attention in the cold: the effect of interval versus continuous exercise

Muller, Matthew D., Muller, Sarah M., Kim, Chul-Ho, Ryan, Edward J., Gunstad, John, Glickman, Ellen L.·2011·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Both mood and cognitive function are altered in cold environments. Body warming through exercise may improve Stroop interference score and lessen total negative mood. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of equal caloric bouts of interval (INT) and continuous (CONT) exercise on mood and selective attention in the cold. Eleven young men underwent two experimental trials in 5°C air. Both trials consisted of 90 min acute cold exposure (ACE), 30 min exercise (INT vs. CONT), and 60 min recovery (REC). The Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT) were administered at four time points. Mean body temperature decreased during ACE, increased during exercise, and decreased during REC. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a main effect for time for several of the POMS sub scores. In particular, negative mood was significantly decreased after exercise relative to ACE and then significantly increased during REC. Further, CONT appears to be more effective than INT at decreasing negative mood. Components of the SCWT supported both the arousal and distraction theories for simple perception, but no significant effects were shown for the interference score. In the cold, exercise decreases negative mood but does not appear to affect selective attention. Further mechanistic studies could determine the best mode and intensity of exercise for improving cognitive function in the cold.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-010-1759-1

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muller, M. D., Muller, S. M., Kim, C.-H., Ryan, E. J., Gunstad, J., & Glickman, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Muller, Matthew D.
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2010-12-09
Volume
111
Issue
7
Pages
1321-1328
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2026915906
Cited by
26
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
cold exposure, interval training, continuous exercise, mood, negative mood, selective attention, Stroop interference, cognitive function, body temperature, post-exercise recovery, arousal theory, acute cold exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Attention, Body Temperature, Body Temperature Regulation, Cold Temperature, Exercise Test, Fatigue, Humans, Male, Periodicity, Time Factors, Exercise, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review