Cited by 200Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Affective and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval training in overweight-to-obese and insufficiently active adults

Martinez, Nic, Kilpatrick, Marcus W., Salomon, Kristen, Jung, Mary E., Little, Jonathan P.·2015·Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Abstract

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has many known physiological benefits, but research investigating the psychological aspects of this training is limited. The purpose of the current study is to investigate the affective and enjoyment responses to continuous and high-intensity interval exercise sessions. Twenty overweight-to-obese, insufficiently active adults completed four counterbalanced trials: a 20-min trial of heavy continuous exercise and three 24-min HIIT trials that used 30-s, 60-s, and 120-s intervals. Affect declined during all trials (p < .05), but affect at the completion of trials was more positive in the shorter interval trials (p < .05). Enjoyment declined in the 120-s interval and heavy continuous conditions only (p < .05). Postexercise enjoyment was higher in the 60-s trial than in the 120-s trial and heavy continuous condition (p < .05). Findings suggest that pleasure and enjoyment are higher during shorter interval trials than during a longer interval or heavy continuous exercise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jsep.2014-0212

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interval duration ≤ 60 s and having a 1:1 ratio of work:recovery may be optimal for increasing perceptual responses to exercise and potentially long-term adherence to this modality of training.

    “These findings suggest that interval duration ≤ 60 s and having a 1:1 ratio of work:recovery may be optimal for increasing perceptual responses to exercise and potentially long-term adherence to this modality of training.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez, N., Kilpatrick, M. W., Salomon, K., Jung, M. E., & Little, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Kilpatrick, Marcus W.
Venue
Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Published
2015-04
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
138-149
ISSN
  • 0895-2779 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2904
OpenAlex
W2096474639
Cited by
200
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 4
FWCI
44.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Forest Service
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
high-intensity interval training, exercise enjoyment, affect, overweight adults, obesity, physical inactivity, continuous exercise, interval length
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Physical Exertion, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Obesity, Psychomotor Performance, Time Factors, Exercise, Overweight, Pleasure, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review