Cited by 11Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementVascular anomalies and interventions

Surgical and endovascular revascularization of chronic mesenteric ischemia

Open access
Wolk, Steffen, Kapalla, Marvin, Ludwig, Stefan, Radosa, Christoph, Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten, Weitz, Jürgen, Reeps, Christian·2022·Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a rare but life-threatening disease. This study reviewed outcomes in patients treated surgically for CMI by open treatment (OT) and endovascular treatment (ET), analyzing risk factors for endovascular failure. METHODS: Clinical data for 36 patients treated for CMI from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The study's primary endpoint was symptom-free survival. The secondary endpoint was the primary technical success for endovascular and open surgical treatments. Risk factors for endovascular failure were identified by using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Patients were analyzed as treated: 21 patients (58.3%) in the ET and 15 (41.6%) in the OT group. Overall, 20 patients (56%) presented with abdominal angina, 9 (25%) with rest pain, and 7 (19%) without symptoms. An ET was initially attempted in 31 patients (86.1%). The conversion rate from ET to OT was 32.3%, which resulted in a primary technical success of 67.6% in ET and 100% in OT. Six patients from the ET group (19.3%) required surgical revision due to restenosis. One-year (OT 91.6% vs. ET 96.8%; n.s.) and three-year primary patency (OT 91.6% vs. ET 80.6%; n.s.) as well as 3-year symptom-free survival did not differ between the groups (OT 62.5% vs. ET 69.4%; n.s). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 2.8% (n = 1), which was not statistically different between the groups (OT 6% vs. ET 0%; n.s.). High-grade stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery tended to be associated with higher technical failure (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: ET showed a comparable perioperative outcome with higher technical failure. OT was distinguished by excellent early and late technical success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00423-022-02462-3

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Open surgery techniques are associated with higher rates of postoperative major adverse events and 30-day mortality.

    “Despite excellent early and late technical success rates associated with open surgery techniques, they have been associated with higher rates of postoperative major adverse events and 30-day mortality [69].”

    From Revascularization Strategies for Acute and Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: A Narrative Review (2024) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Results (Patient outcome; page unavailable) report significantly more major complications after open than endovascular treatment. They report in-hospital mortality, not a 30-day mortality comparison; the higher rate in the open-treatment group (6.7% versus 0%) was not statistically significant (P = 0.42). (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Open surgery techniques have excellent early and late technical success rates.

    “Despite excellent early and late technical success rates associated with open surgery techniques, they have been associated with higher rates of postoperative major adverse events and 30-day mortality [69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolk, S., Kapalla, M., Ludwig, S., Radosa, C., Hoffmann, R.-T., Weitz, J., & Reeps, C.
Affiliations
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
Corresponding author
Wolk, Steffen
Venue
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Published
2022-02-19
Volume
407
Issue
5
Pages
2085-2094
ISSN
  • 0023-8236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-2451
OpenAlex
W4213009230
Cited by
11
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden an der Technischen Universität Dresden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
Keywords
chronic mesenteric ischemia, endovascular revascularization, open surgical revascularization, superior mesenteric artery stenosis, restenosis, primary patency, symptom-free survival, conversion to open surgery, risk factors
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Constriction, Pathologic, Humans, Ischemia, Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Vascular Patency, Stents, Treatment Outcome, Endovascular Procedures, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review