Cited by 57Parasitic Infections and DiagnosticsHelminth infection and controlParasitic infections in humans and animals

Zoonotic parasites in feces and fur of stray and private dogs from Italy

Paoletti, Barbara, Traversa, Donato, Iorio, Raffaella, De Berardinis, Alberto, Bartolini, Roberto, Salini, Romolo, Di Cesare, Angela·2015·Parasitology Research

Abstract

The present study evaluated the occurrence of zoonotic parasites in feces and on fur of stray and private dogs living in Italy. Individual fecal samples collected from 117 and 385 kenneled (i.e., rescue shelter) and privately owned dogs, respectively, were examined by conventional copromicroscopy. Samples positive for Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. were subjected to further genetic characterization. Additionally, 174 fur samples of private and kenneled dogs living in the same area, 27 of which were also subjected to copromicroscopical examinations, were examined for the presence and viability of parasite elements. Out of 502 fecal samples, forty-one (8.2%) scored positive for G. duodenalis cysts while one (0.2%) for Cryptosporidium oocysts. Nine private dogs were molecularly positive for G. duodenalis assemblage C (n. 7), assemblage D (n. 1), and assemblages C + D (n. 1), while 11 kenneled dogs were positive for assemblage C (n. 8), assemblage D (n. 1), and assemblages C + D (n. 2). Cryptosporidium spp. were identified as C. canis in a private dog. One hundred and seventy-two dogs (34.3%), i.e., 92 private and 80 kenneled, were positive for zoonotic nematodes: Toxocara canis (6.6 %), Ancylostoma caninum (6.8%), and Capillaria aerophila (0.6%). Unviable eggs of Toxocara spp. were found on the hair of five (2.9%) private dogs. The present findings indicate that canine feces from both private and kenneled animals may contain zoonotic parasites and may be a potential…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-015-4402-6

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paoletti, B., Traversa, D., Iorio, R., De Berardinis, A., Bartolini, R., Salini, R., & Di Cesare, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Teramo (IT)
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale (IT)
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2015-03-17
Volume
114
Issue
6
Pages
2135-2141
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W2011290886
Cited by
57
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniTERAMO Research Catalog (University of Teramo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
Keywords
zoonotic parasites, stray dogs, kennel dogs, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium canis, Giardia assemblages, Toxocara canis, Ancylostoma caninum, Capillaria aerophila, fecal contamination
MeSH terms
Animals, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Feces, Hair, Helminthiasis, Animal, Housing, Animal, Humans, Italy, Ownership, Protozoan Infections, Animal, Zoonoses, Prevalence, Oocysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review