Cited by 26Sex and Gender in HealthcareMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationGender, Health, and Social Inequality

The meanings given to gender in studies on multimodal rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain–a literature review

Ahlgren, Christina, Fjellman-Wiklund, Anncristine, Hamberg, Katarina, Johansson, Eva E., Stålnacke, Britt-Marie·2016·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess and describe the meanings given to "gender" in scientific publications that evaluate multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary or multimodal rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHOD: A systematic literature search for papers evaluating multimodal rehabilitation was conducted. The PubMed and EBSCO databases were searched from 1995 to 2015. Two or three researchers independently read each paper, performed a quality assessment and coded meanings of gender using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven papers were included in the review. Gender was used very differently in the MMR studies investigated but primarily it referred to factual differences between men and women. Only one paper provided a definition of the concept of gender and how it had been used in that study. In the content analysis, the meaning of gender formed three categories: "Gender as a factual difference", "The man is the ideal" and "Gender as a result of social role expectations". CONCLUSIONS: The meaning of the concept of gender in multimodal rehabilitation is undefined and needs to be developed further. The way the concept is used should be defined in the design and evaluation of multimodal rehabilitation in future studies. Implications for rehabilitation Healthcare professionals should reflect on gender relations in encounters with patients, selection of patients into rehabilitation programs and design of programs. In rehabilitation for chronic pain the patients' social circumstances and cultural context should be given the same consideration as biological sex and pain symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638288.2015.1127435

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahlgren, C., Fjellman-Wiklund, A., Hamberg, K., Johansson, E. E., & Stålnacke, B.-M.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ahlgren, Christina
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2016-01-05
Volume
38
Issue
23
Pages
2255-2270
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2226139128
Cited by
26
References
79
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
gender, multimodal rehabilitation, chronic musculoskeletal pain, concept definition, gender differences, social role expectations, interdisciplinary rehabilitation, patient selection
MeSH terms
Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Sex Characteristics, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review