Cited by 9Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Chancen niederschwelliger online Peer-to-Peer Begleitung für Jugendliche am Beispiel der Online-Plattform OPEN

Open access
Jesser, Andrea, Schmalwieser, Susanne, Mädge, Anna-Lena, Culen, Caroline, Schrank, Beate, Böckle, Markus·2021·Psychotherapie Forum

Abstract

Zusammenfassung: Im Jugendalter stehen Menschen vor einer Reihe an Entwicklungsaufgaben und biographischen Herausforderungen. Nicht immer fühlen sich die Jugendlichen den Problemen gewachsen, die dieser Lebensabschnitt mit sich bringt und so kommt es mitunter zu erheblichen psychischen Belastungen sowie zu Konflikten und Krisen. Die COVID-19-Pandemie hat die Situation junger Menschen zusätzlich verschärft, die mehr als andere Altersgruppen von den Auswirkungen der Lockdown-Beschränkungen betroffen sind. Dazu zählen insbesondere Einsamkeit, soziale Isolation und Zukunftsängste. Aus unterschiedlichen Gründen finden Jugendliche oft keinen oder erst spät Zugang zu psycho-sozialer Unterstützung. Niederschwellige Hilfsangebote sind derzeit rar und decken den vorhandenen Bedarf nicht ab. Wir stellen in diesem Paper die Plattform OPEN vor, über die Jugendliche online, anonym und kostenlos mit geschulten und supervidierten jugendlichen Peer-Begleiter_innen in Kontakt treten und sich über ihre Probleme austauschen können.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00729-021-00188-z

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-designed eHealth for adolescents appears to be associated with a more engaging and satisfying user experience.

    “Co-designed eHealth for adolescents appears to be associated with a more engaging and satisfying user experience [34-37].”

    From Effectiveness of Online and Remote Interventions for Mental Health in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [35]

    The section “OPEN – eine Online-Plattform für Peer-to-Peer Begleitung” (page unavailable) says the adolescent platform was developed through a participatory project and that most interviewees favored the proposed online peer-support format. It does not report user-experience findings or show that co-design was associated with greater engagement or satisfaction. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies have shown positive effects by including peer groups in the development process and using peers as advisors.

    “studies have shown positive effects by including peer groups in the development process [34,36] and using peers as advisors [35,37].”

    From Effectiveness of Online and Remote Interventions for Mental Health in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [35]

    The section “OPEN – eine Online-Plattform für Peer-to-Peer Begleitung” (page unavailable) describes a platform developed with input from young people and designed to connect them with trained peer supporters. It also reports that interviewees largely favored the proposed approach. It does not report studies demonstrating positive effects from using peers as advisors, which is the part of the citing sentence to which this source appears attached. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Elstad, T. A. (2014). Participation in a ‘low threshold’ community mental health service: an Ethnographic study of social interaction, activities and meaning. Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae doctor. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/268000. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.
  2. Pieh C Plener PL Probst T Dale R Humer E Mental health in adolescents during COVID-19-related social distancing and home-schooling (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3795639) 2021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jesser, A., Schmalwieser, S., Mädge, A.-L., Culen, C., Schrank, B., & Böckle, M.
Affiliations
  • Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
  • Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences (AT)
  • Universitätsklinikum Tulln (AT)
Corresponding author
Jesser, Andrea
Venue
Psychotherapie Forum
Published
2021-12
Volume
25
Issue
3-4
Pages
154-160
ISSN
  • 0943-1950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-7604
OpenAlex
W4200409511
Cited by
9
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapie Forum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
peer support, adolescents, online peer support, open platform, youth mental health, COVID-19 pandemic, loneliness, social isolation, future anxiety, psychosocial support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review