Cited by 198Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 33 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

CALM Pregnancy: results of a pilot study of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for perinatal anxiety

Open access
Goodman, Janice H., Guarino, Anthony, Chenausky, Kerry, Klein, Lauri, Prager, Joanna, Petersen, Rebecca, Forget, Avery, Freeman, Marlene·2014·Archives of Women's Mental Health

Abstract

Many women experience anxiety during pregnancy with potential negative effects on maternal, birth, and child outcomes. Because of potential risks of fetal exposure to psychotropic medications, efficacious non-pharmacologic approaches are urgently needed. However, no published studies of psychotherapeutic treatments for anxiety in pregnancy exist. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) may substantially reduce anxiety and co-morbid symptoms in people with anxiety disorders. Coping with Anxiety through Living Mindfully (CALM) Pregnancy is an adaptation of MBCT designed to address anxiety in pregnant women. This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcomes of the CALM Pregnancy intervention in pregnant women anxiety. Twenty-four pregnant women with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) or prominent symptoms of generalized anxiety participated in an open treatment trial of the CALM Pregnancy group intervention. Psychiatric diagnoses were determined by structured clinical interview, and self-report measures of anxiety, worry, depression, self-compassion, and mindfulness were completed at baseline and post-intervention. Qualitative feedback was elicited via questionnaire. Twenty-three participants completed the intervention with high attendance and good compliance with home practice. Completers showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in anxiety, worry, and depression, and significant increases in self-compassion and mindfulness. Of the 17 participants who met GAD criteria at baseline, only one continued to meet criteria post-intervention. Participants regarded their experience in the intervention to be overwhelmingly positive. MBCT in the form of the CALM Pregnancy intervention holds potential to provide effective, non-pharmacological treatment for pregnant women with anxiety. These promising findings warrant further testing of the intervention with a randomized controlled trial. © 2014, Springer-Verlag Wien.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-013-0402-7

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

37 Own result · 19 Own interpretation · 9 No full text of the sources · 8 Own method · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 26
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 26
43 of 43
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No published studies of psychotherapeutic treatments for anxiety in pregnancy exist to date.

    “yet such therapies have not been tested for treatment of anxiety in pregnant women. Despite a great need for effective, non-pharmacological interventions, research specifically addressing treatment of anxiety disorders during pregnancy is seriously lacking, with no published studies of psychotherapeutic treatments for anxiety in pregnancy to date.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mindfulness-based interventions have not yet been tested as a treatment for clinically significant distress, including anxiety or depressive disorders, in pregnant or postpartum women.

    “However, MBIs have not yet been tested as a treatment for clinically significant distress, including anxiety disorders or depressive disorders in pregnant or postpartum women.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Women overwhelmingly prefer non-pharmacological interventions during pregnancy.

    “Women overwhelming prefer non-pharmacological interventions during pregnancy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior study has tested a treatment created for and given to pregnant women with GAD or prominent generalized anxiety symptoms.

    “This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to examine a treatment specifically designed for, and administered to, pregnant women with GAD or prominent symptoms of generalized anxiety.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Maternal anxiety and depression are linked to poor obstetric and infant outcomes.

    “Because anxiety and depressive symptoms are associated with negative obstetric and infant outcomes”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Group interventions that work usually cost less and use fewer resources than individual therapy.

    “Effective group interventions are generally more resource- and cost-effective than individual therapy.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 112 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Beck AT, Steer RA (1990) Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio
  2. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK (1996) BDI-II: 2nd Edition Manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio
  3. Orsillo SM, Roemer L (2011) The mindful way through anxiety. Guilford, New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Goodman, J. H., Guarino, A., Chenausky, K., Klein, L., Prager, J., Petersen, R., Forget, A., & Freeman, M.
Affiliations
  • MGH Institute of Health Professions (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Janice H.
Venue
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Published
2014-01-22
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
373-387
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2023934072
Cited by
198
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
15.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD065156)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, perinatal anxiety, pregnancy, generalized anxiety disorder, non-pharmacological treatment, self-compassion, mindfulness, depression, worry, treatment feasibility and acceptability, group therapy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Perinatal Care, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review