Cited by 284Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health Interventions

The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in the perinatal period: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Lever Taylor, Billie, Cavanagh, Kate, Strauss, Clara·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Perinatal mental health difficulties are associated with adverse consequences for parents and infants. However, the potential risks associated with the use of psychotropic medication for pregnant and breastfeeding women and the preferences expressed by women for non-pharmacological interventions mean it is important to ensure that effective psychological interventions are available. It has been argued that mindfulness-based interventions may offer a novel approach to treating perinatal mental health difficulties, but relatively little is known about their effectiveness with perinatal populations. This paper therefore presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for reducing depression, anxiety and stress and improving mindfulness skills in the perinatal period. A systematic review identified seventeen studies of mindfulness-based interventions in the perinatal period, including both controlled trials (n = 9) and pre-post uncontrolled studies (n = 8). Eight of these studies also included qualitative data. Hedge's g was used to assess uncontrolled and controlled effect sizes in separate meta-analyses, and a narrative synthesis of qualitative data was produced. Pre- to post-analyses showed significant reductions in depression, anxiety and stress and significant increases in mindfulness skills post intervention, each with small to medium effect sizes. Completion of the mindfulness-based interventions was reasonable with around three quarters of participants meeting study-defined criteria for engagement or completion where this was recorded. Qualitative data suggested that participants viewed mindfulness interventions positively. However, between-group analyses failed to find any significant post-intervention benefits for depression, anxiety or stress of mindfulness-based interventions in comparison to control conditions: effect sizes were negligible and it was conspicuous that intervention group participants did not appear to improve significantly more than controls in their mindfulness skills. The interventions offered often deviated from traditional mindfulness-based cognitive therapy or mindfulness-based stress reduction programmes, and there was also a tendency for studies to focus on healthy rather than clinical populations, and on antenatal rather than postnatal populations. It is argued that these and other limitations with the included studies and their interventions may have been partly responsible for the lack of significant between-group effects. The implications of the findings and recommendations for future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0155720

Cites

73 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [47]Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis Orlando FL: Academic Press; 1985.
  2. [48]Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research ewbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1993.
  3. [55]Pak AV, Ahmadian H, Rahimi E. Efficacy of Mindfulness Training on Enhancing Happiness in Women with pregnancy diabetes. Advances in Environmental Biology. 2013; 7(13), 4203– 4207.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lever Taylor, B., Cavanagh, K., & Strauss, C.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Strauss, Clara
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-05-16
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
e0155720
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2350328130
Cited by
284
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Surrey
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, perinatal mental health, perinatal depression, perinatal anxiety, perinatal stress, mindfulness skills, prenatal period, postpartum period, non-pharmacological treatment, pregnant and lactating women, intervention completion
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Pregnancy, Stress, Psychological, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Publication Bias, Perinatal Care, Early Medical Intervention, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review