Cited by 123Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Internet-delivered psychological interventions for clinical anxiety and depression in perinatal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Loughnan, Siobhan A., Joubert, Amy E., Grierson, Ashlee, Andrews, Gavin, Newby, Jill M.·2019·Archives of Women's Mental Health

Abstract

Perinatal anxiety and depression are common and associated with negative outcomes if left untreated. Internet-delivered treatments can improve treatment accessibility and have demonstrated effectiveness in treating anxiety and depression in the general adult population. However, little is known about how effective and acceptable these interventions are for perinatal women. This paper describes a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis of internet-delivered psychological interventions for the treatment of clinical anxiety and depression in perinatal women. A systematic search was carried out of seven electronic databases. Seven studies evaluating six distinct internet-delivered psychological interventions were identified. Of the seven studies included, two were open trials and five were randomized controlled trials with a total of 595 participants. Preliminary findings indicate large improvements in depression (Hedges g = 1.67; 95% CI 1.38-1.96) and anxiety (Hedges g = 1.08; 95% CI 0.80-1.36) from pre- to post-treatment. However, between-group differences between interventions and control conditions were only moderate for depression (Hedges g = 0.60; 95% CI 0.43-0.78) and anxiety (Hedges g = 0.54; 95% CI 0.24-0.85). While our preliminary findings are promising, this review identifies an area of research still in its early stages with significant gaps in the literature that need to be addressed. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy and acceptability of these interventions in this population, especially for antenatal depression and anxiety disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-019-00961-9

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loughnan, S. A., Joubert, A. E., Grierson, A., Andrews, G., & Newby, J. M.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Loughnan, Siobhan A.
Venue
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Published
2019-05-17
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
737-750
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2946268359
Cited by
123
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
perinatal anxiety, perinatal depression, antenatal depression, prenatal anxiety, perinatal women, treatment efficacy, acceptability, digital mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review