Cited by 217Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: 6-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Gevensleben, Holger, Holl, Birgit, Albrecht, Björn, Schlamp, Dieter, Kratz, Oliver, Studer, Petra, Rothenberger, Aribert, Moll, Gunther H. +1 more·2010·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Neurofeedback (NF) could help to improve attentional and self-management capabilities in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In a randomised controlled trial, NF training was found to be superior to a computerised attention skills training (AST) (Gevensleben et al. in J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50(7):780-789, 2009). In the present paper, treatment effects at 6-month follow-up were studied. 94 children with ADHD, aged 8-12 years, completed either 36 sessions of NF training (n = 59) or a computerised AST (n = 35). Pre-training, post-training and follow-up assessment encompassed several behaviour rating scales (e.g., the German ADHD rating scale, FBB-HKS) completed by parents. Follow-up information was analysed in 61 children (ca. 65%) on a per-protocol basis. 17 children (of 33 dropouts) had started a medication after the end of the training or early in the follow-up period. Improvements in the NF group (n = 38) at follow-up were superior to those of the control group (n = 23) and comparable to the effects at the end of the training. For the FBB-HKS total score (primary outcome measure), a medium effect size of 0.71 was obtained at follow-up. A reduction of at least 25% in the primary outcome measure (responder criterion) was observed in 50% of the children in the NF group. In conclusion, behavioural improvements induced by NF training in children with ADHD were maintained at a 6-month follow-up. Though treatment effects appear to be limited, the results confirm the notion that NF is a clinically efficacious module in the treatment of children with ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-010-0109-5

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike psychostimulant treatment, NF effects seem stable and longer-lasting (up to 2 years), with no side effects.

    “Interestingly, however, unlike psychostimulant treatment, NF effects seem stable and longer-lasting (up to 2 years), with no side effects (Gevensleben et al., 2010; Arns et al., 2014).”

    From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Gevensleben et al., 2010

    The Discussion reports that neurofeedback improvements in children with ADHD were sustained at this trial’s 6-month follow-up; the Introduction also reports a separate, uncontrolled 2-year follow-up with stable or enhanced effects. This trial did not compare the durability of neurofeedback with psychostimulant treatment, and the passages found do not establish that neurofeedback has no side effects. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) 1994 Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press
  2. [6]Döpfner M Berner W Flechtner H Lehmkuhl G Steinhausen HC Psychopathologisches Befund-System für Kinder und Jugendliche (CASCAP-D) 1999 Göttingen Hogrefe 8342337
  3. [8]Döpfner M Schürmann S Frölich J Therapieprogramm für Kinder mit hyperkinetischem und oppositionellem Problemverhalten (THOP) 2002 Beltz Weinheim 9459672

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gevensleben, H., Holl, B., Albrecht, B., Schlamp, D., Kratz, O., Studer, P., Rothenberger, A., Moll, G. H., & Heinrich, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Heinrich, Hartmut
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2010-05-25
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
715-724
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W2062063587
Cited by
217
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI
15.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
neurofeedback, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, treatment effects, follow-up, self-management, attention, medication use
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Treatment Outcome, Neurofeedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review