Cited by 306Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Clinical Utility of EEG in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Research Update

Open access
Loo, Sandra K., Makeig, Scott·2012·Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Psychiatric research applications of electroencephalography (EEG), the earliest approach to imaging human cortical brain activity, are attracting increasing scientific and clinical interest. For more than 40 years, EEG research has attempted to characterize and quantify the neurophysiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), most consistently associating it with increased frontocentral theta band activity and increased theta to beta (θ/β) power ratio during rest compared to non-ADHD controls. Recent reports suggest that while these EEG measures demonstrate strong discriminant validity for ADHD, significant EEG heterogeneity also exists across ADHD-diagnosed individuals. In particular, additional studies validating the use of the θ/β power ratio measure appear to be needed before it can be used for clinical diagnosis. In recent years, the number and the scientific quality of research reports on EEG-based neurofeedback (NF) for ADHD have grown considerably, although the studies reviewed here do not yet support NF training as a first-line, stand-alone treatment modality. In particular, more research is needed comparing NF to placebo control and other effective treatments for ADHD. Currently, after a long period of relative stasis, the neurophysiological specificity of measures used in EEG research is rapidly increasing. It is likely, therefore, that new EEG studies of ADHD using higher density recordings and new measures drawn from viewing EEG as a 3-dimensional functional imaging modality, as well as intensive re-analyses of existing EEG study data, can better characterize the neurophysiological differences between and within ADHD and non-ADHD subjects, and lead to more precise diagnostic measures and effective NF approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13311-012-0131-z

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Loo SK, Hale TS, Hanada G, et al., Familial clustering and DRD4 effects on electroencephalogram measures in multiplex families with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2010;29:368-377.
  2. Nazari MA, Wallois F, Aarabi A, Berquin P. Dynamic changes in quantitative electroencephalogram during continuous performance test in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Int J Psychophysiol 2011;81:230-236.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loo, S. K., & Makeig, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Loo, Sandra K.
Venue
Neurotherapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
569-587
ISSN
1878-7479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092515476
Cited by
306
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1R03MH92829, R01MH084819, R03MH092829)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS047293)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, EEG, EEG-based neurofeedback, ADHD diagnosis, discriminant validity, ADHD treatment
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Humans, Biomedical Research, Brain Waves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review