Cited by 20Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsPharmaceutical studies and practices

An inventory of European data sources for the long-term safety evaluation of methylphenidate

Open access
Murray, Macey L., Insuk, Suppachai, Banaschewski, Tobias, Neubert, Antje C., McCarthy, Suzanne, Buitelaar, Jan K., Coghill, David, Dittmann, Ralf W. +5 more·2013·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

To compile an inventory of European healthcare databases with potential to study long-term effects of methylphenidate (MPH) in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Potential databases were identified through expert opinion, the website of the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance, and literature search. An online survey was conducted among database providers/coordinators to ascertain the databases' appropriateness for inclusion into the inventory. It included questions about database characteristics, sample size, availability of information on drug exposure, clinical data and accessibility. Forty-two databases from 11 countries were identified and their coordinators invited to participate; responses were obtained for 22 (52.4 %) databases of which 15 record ADHD diagnoses. Eleven had sufficient data on ADHD diagnosis, drug exposure, and at least one type of outcome information (symptoms/clinical events, weight, height, blood pressure, heart rate) to assess MPH safety. These were Aarhus University Prescription Database, Danish National Birth Cohort (Denmark); German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents; Health Search Database Thales, Italian ADHD Register, Lombardy Region ADHD Database (Italy); Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, General Practice Research Database, The Health Improvement Network, QResearch (UK) and IMS Disease Analyzer (UK, Germany, France). Of the 20 databases with no responses, information on seven from publications and/or websites was obtained; Pedianet and the Integrated Primary Care Information database were considered suitable. Many European healthcare databases can be used for multinational long-term safety studies of MPH. Methodological research is underway to investigate the feasibility of their pooling and analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-013-0386-x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The latest meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of EEG-NF show medium effect sizes for symptom improvements, reduced to trends when only 'probably' blinded raters are included.

    “the latest meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of EEG-NF show medium effect sizes for symptom improvements (Arns et al., 2009), reduced to trends when only “probably” blinded raters are included (Murray et al., 2013; Cortese et al., 2015).”

    From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Murray et al., 2013

    The Discussion (page not provided) mentions EEG only as a measurement that may be missing from databases used to study methylphenidate safety. Searches for blinded raters, EEG neurofeedback trials, and meta-analyses found no passage reporting that symptom improvements were reduced to trends; the portion attributed to Murray et al. cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, M. L., Insuk, S., Banaschewski, T., Neubert, A. C., McCarthy, S., Buitelaar, J. K., Coghill, D., Dittmann, R. W., Konrad, K., Panei, P., Rosenthal, E., Sonuga-Barke, E. J., & Wong, I. C. K.
Affiliations
  • UCL School of Pharmacy (GB)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Murray, Macey L.
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2013-03-19
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
605-618
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W1963955527
Cited by
20
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • University of Dundee
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Università degli Studi di Cagliari
  • Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte
  • University of Southampton
  • King's College London
  • University College London
  • European Commission (260576)
  • University College Cork
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Universität Heidelberg
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Radboud Universiteit
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità
  • Servier
  • Lilly Deutschland
  • School of Pharmacy, University College London
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • UCB Pharma
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, long-term drug safety, pharmacoepidemiology, health databases, primary care databases
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Data Collection, Europe, Humans, Methylphenidate, Registries, Safety, Databases, Factual, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Pharmacovigilance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review