Cited by 77Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentHealth and Medical Studies

Mental health care use among children and adolescents in Germany: results of the longitudinal BELLA study

The BELLA study group, Hintzpeter, Birte, Klasen, Fionna, Schön, Gerhard, Voss, Catharina, Hölling, Heike, Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike·2015·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Data on mental health care use of children and adolescents in Germany is scarce. This study investigates the degree of mental health care use, its trajectories and influencing factors among children and adolescents in Germany, using longitudinal data of the BELLA study. The BELLA study is the mental health module of the representative German National Health Interview and Examination Survey for children and adolescents (KiGGS). Baseline data of N = 2,863 participants aged 7-17 years were collected between 2003 and 2006. The study sample was followed up in three additional measurement points, assessing general mental health problems and impairment, specific mental health problems, and mental health care use. In the current study, we analysed data from the first three measurement points. At baseline, 5.9 % of all participants used mental health care in the past 12 months. Among those with general mental health problems, 29.5 % sought professional help. Only a minority of participants reporting mental health care use at baseline also sought help at the following two measurement points. Analysing a random intercept only model, mental health care use was found to be more likely among participants living in larger communities as well as in the Eastern part of Germany, among those participants with impairment of mental health problems, and signs of externalizing problems. Our results indicate a temporary character of mental health care use. Participants' impairment was identified to be the strongest predictor of mental health care use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-015-0676-6

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The BELLA study group, Hintzpeter, B., Klasen, F., Schön, G., Voss, C., Hölling, H., & Ravens-Sieberer, U.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Robert Koch Institute (DE)
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2015-02-05
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
705-713
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W2082303056
Cited by
77
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
mental health service utilization, children and adolescents, help-seeking, psychiatric disability, externalizing problems, community size, regional variation, KiGGS, predictors of help-seeking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Germany, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review