Cited by 101Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessHealth and Medical Studies

How impaired are children and adolescents by mental health problems? Results of the BELLA study

Open access
Wille, Nora, Bettge, Susanne, Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich, Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike, The BELLA study group·2008·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The consideration of impairment plays a crucial role in detecting significant mental health problems in children whose symptoms do not meet diagnostic criteria. The assessment of impairment may be particularly relevant when only short screening instruments are applied in epidemiological surveys. Furthermore, differences between childrens' and parents' perceptions of present impairment and impairing symptoms are of interest with respect to treatment-seeking behaviour. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to assess parent- and self-reported impairment due to mental health problems in a representative sample of children and adolescents; to describe the characteristics of highly impaired children with normal symptom scores; and to investigate the associations between symptoms in different problem areas and impairment. METHODS: The mental health module of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (the BELLA study) examined mental health in a representative sub-sample of 2,863 families with children aged 7-17. Self-reported and parent-reported symptoms of mental health problems and associated impairment were identified by the extended version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in children 11 years and older. RESULTS: Considerable levels of distress and functional impairment were found with 14.1% of the boys and 9.9% of the girls being severely impaired according to the parental reports. However, self-reported data shows a reversed gender-difference as well as lower levels of severe impairment (6.1% in boys; 10.0% in girls). Six percent of the sampled children suffer from pronounced impairment due to mental health problems but were not detected by screening for overall symptoms. Childrens' and parents' reports differed in regard to the association between reported symptom scores and associated impairment with children reporting higher impairment due to emotional problems. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of impairment caused by mental health problems provides important information beyond the knowledge of symptoms and helps to identify an otherwise undetected high risk group. In the assessment of impairment, gender-specific issues have to be taken into account. Regarding the systematic differences between childrens' and parents' reports in the assessment of impairment, the child's perspective should be given special attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-008-1005-0

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional impairment can highlight difficulties faced in daily life, even by individuals with low psychological symptoms.

    “Assessing functional impairment is essential to capture the training’s potential for meaningful impact, as it is indicative of future mental ill-health (Andrews & Schweizer, 2023) and can highlight difficulties faced in daily life, even by individuals with low psychological symptoms (Wille, Bettge, Wittchen, Ravens-Sieberer, & The BELLA study group, 2008).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wille, N., Bettge, S., Wittchen, H.-U., Ravens-Sieberer, U., & The BELLA study group
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Wille, Nora
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2008-12
Volume
17
Issue
S1
Pages
42-51
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W1969337703
Cited by
101
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
psychiatric disability, children and adolescents, parent-child agreement, gender differences, emotional problems, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, mental health screening, treatment-seeking behavior, functional disability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Psychiatry, Affective Symptoms, Attention, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Psychiatry, Family, Female, Germany, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Parents, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Cost of Illness, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review