Cited by 30Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentInfant Health and DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and Development

Early family regularity protects against later disruptive behavior

Open access
Rijlaarsdam, Jolien, Tiemeier, Henning, Ringoot, Ank P., Ivanova, Masha Y., Jaddoe, Vincent W. V., Verhulst, Frank C., Roza, Sabine J.·2016·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Infants' temperamental anger or frustration reactions are highly stable, but are also influenced by maturation and experience. It is yet unclear why some infants high in anger or frustration reactions develop disruptive behavior problems whereas others do not. We examined family regularity, conceptualized as the consistency of mealtime and bedtime routines, as a protective factor against the development of oppositional and aggressive behavior. This study used prospectively collected data from 3136 families participating in the Generation R Study. Infant anger or frustration reactions and family regularity were reported by mothers when children were ages 6 months and 2-4 years, respectively. Multiple informants (parents, teachers, and children) and methods (questionnaire and interview) were used in the assessment of children's oppositional and aggressive behavior at age 6. Higher levels of family regularity were associated with lower levels of child aggression independent of temperamental anger or frustration reactions (β = -0.05, p = 0.003). The association between child oppositional behavior and temperamental anger or frustration reactions was moderated by family regularity and child gender (β = 0.11, p = 0.046): family regularity reduced the risk for oppositional behavior among those boys who showed anger or frustration reactions in infancy. In conclusion, family regularity reduced the risk for child aggression and showed a gender-specific protective effect against child oppositional behavior associated with anger or frustration reactions. Families that ensured regularity of mealtime and bedtime routines buffered their infant sons high in anger or frustration reactions from developing oppositional behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-015-0797-y

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Engaging in regular routines can buffer the effects of family stress and individual child risk factors on child wellbeing.

    “engaging in regular routines can buffer against the effects of family stress [37] and individual child risk factors [28,38,39] on child wellbeing.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [2]Rothbart MK Temperament, development, and personality Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2007 16 207 212 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00505.x · DOI
  2. [4]Caspi A Henry B McGee RO Moffitt TE Silva PA Temperamental origins of child and adolescent behavior problems: from age three to age fifteen Child Dev 1995 66 55 68 10.2307/1131190 7497829 · DOI
  3. [5]Burke JD Loeber R Birmaher B Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: a review of the past 10 years, part II J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002 41 1275 1293 10.1097/00004583-200211000-00009 12410070 · DOI
  4. [7]Baldridge S Family stability and childhood behavioral outcomes: a critical review of the literature J Fam Strengths 2011 11 8
  5. [8]Ivanova MY Israel AC Family stability as a protective factor against psychopathology for urban children receiving psychological services J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2006 35 564 570 10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_7 17007601 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [9]Ivanova MY Israel AC Family stability as a protective factor against the influences of pessimistic attributional style on depression Cogn Ther Res 2005 29 243 251 10.1007/s10608-005-3167-0 · DOI
  7. [10]Israel AC Roderick HA Ivanova MY A measure of the stability of activities in a family environment J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2002 24 85 95 10.1023/A:1015336707701 · DOI
  8. [11]Malatras JW Israel AC The influence of family stability on self-control and adjustment J Clin Psychol 2013 69 661 670 10.1002/jclp.21935 23124588 · DOI
  9. [12]Tremblay RE Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the ‘original sin’ hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2010 51 341 367 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02211.x 20146751 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]Fontaine N Carbonneau R Vitaro F Barker ED Tremblay RE Research review: a critical review of studies on the developmental trajectories of antisocial behavior in females J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009 50 363 385 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01949.x 19236525 · DOI
  11. [15]Wichstrom L Berg-Nielsen TS Angold A Egger HL Solheim E Sveen TH Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in preschoolers J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2012 53 695 705 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02514.x 22211517 · DOI
  12. [17]Gartstein MA Rothbart MK Studying infant temperament via the revised infant behavior questionnaire Infant Behav Dev 2003 26 64 86 10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00169-8 · DOI
  13. [18]Roza SJ van Lier PA Jaddoe VW Steegers EA Moll HA Mackenbach JP Hofman A Verhulst FC Tiemeier H Intrauterine growth and infant temperamental difficulties: the Generation R study J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2008 47 264 272 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318160b3df 18216736 · DOI
  14. [20]Hu LT Bentler PM Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives Struct Equ Model 1999 6 1 55 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [24]Ablow JC Measelle JR Kraemer HC Harrington R Luby J Smider N Dierker L Clark V Dubicka B Heffelfinger A Essex MJ Kupfer DJ The MacArthur three-city outcome study: evaluating multi-informant measures of young children’s symptomatology J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999 38 1580 1590 10.1097/00004583-199912000-00020 10596259 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [25]Ringoot AP Jansen PW Steenweg-de Graaff J Measelle JR van der Ende J Raat H Jaddoe VW Hofman A Verhulst FC Tiemeier H Young children’s self-reported emotional, behavioral, and peer problems: the Berkeley puppet interview Psychol Assess 2013 25 1273 1285 10.1037/a0033976 23937536 · DOI
  17. [26]Kraemer HC Measelle JR Ablow JC Essex MJ Boyce WT Kupfer DJ A new approach to integrating data from multiple informants in psychiatric assessment and research: mixing and matching contexts and perspectives Am J Psychiat 2003 160 1566 1577 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.9.1566 12944328 · DOI
  18. [27]Rijlaarsdam J Stevens GW van der Ende J Hofman A Jaddoe VW Mackenbach JP Verhulst FC Tiemeier H Economic disadvantage and young children’s emotional and behavioral problems: mechanisms of risk J Abnorm Child Psychol 2013 41 125 137 10.1007/s10802-012-9655-2 22736330 PMC3540352 · DOI
  19. [30]Hayes AF Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach 2013 New York The Guilford Press
  20. [31]McClelland GH Judd CM Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects Psychol Bull 1993 114 376 390 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376 8416037 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [32]Bandura A Aggression: a social learning analysis 1973 Oxford Prentice-Hall
  22. [33]Keenan K Shaw D Developmental and social influences on young girls’ early problem behavior Psychol Bull 1997 121 95 113 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.95 9000893 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [34]Wolke D Waylen A Samara M Steer C Goodman R Ford T Lamberts K Selective drop-out in longitudinal studies and non-biased prediction of behaviour disorders Br J Psychiatry 2009 195 249 256 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053751 19721116 PMC2802508 · DOI
  24. [35]Juffer F Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ van IJzendoorn MH Promoting positive parenting: an attachment-based intervention 2008 New York Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rijlaarsdam, J., Tiemeier, H., Ringoot, A. P., Ivanova, M. Y., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Verhulst, F. C., & Roza, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Roza, Sabine J.
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2015-11-20
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
781-789
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W2177022705
Cited by
30
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sophia Foundation for Scientific Research (SSWO) (201310)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
mealtime routines, bedtime routines, disruptive behavior, oppositional behavior, child aggression, gender differences, protective factors, Generation R Study
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Prospective Studies, Temperament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review