Cited by 120Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Whatʼs in a Disruptive Disorder? Temperamental Antecedents of Oppositional Defiant Disorder: Findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study

Stringaris, Argyris, Maughan, Barbara, Goodman, Robert·2010·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is classified as a disruptive disorder, but shows a wide range of associations with other psychopathology, including internalizing problems. The reasons for these associations are unclear. Here we test the hypothesis that two distinct early temperamental precursors-emotionality and activity-underlie ODD and differentially predict its comorbidities. Method The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) community-based representative sample was used. Temperamental dimensions at the age of 38 months were derived through exploratory factor analysis from the Emotionality Activity Sociability (EAS) scale and used in logistic regression predicting to psychiatric diagnoses at the age of 91 months. Results Pure ODD was predicted by both emotionality (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.34, CI = 1.09 to 1.66) and activity (RRR = 1.39, CI = 1.07 to 1.81). The strongest predictions were from early temperament to ODD with comorbidity: from emotionality to ODD plus internalizing disorders (RRR = 3.33, CI = 2.14 to 5.19), and from activity to ODD plus ADHD (RRR = 3.24, CI = 1.48 to 7.11). Temperamental activity was a predictor of the hyperactive-impulsive and combined types of ADHD but not of the inattentive type. Conclusions Classified as a disruptive disorder, ODD is predicted by early emotion dysregulation as well as by high levels of temperamental activity. The findings of this study suggest that early emotionality and activity differentially contribute to the phenotype of ODD in middle childhood and may determine its range of co-occurrence with other psychopathology. Taking into account the heterogeneous origins of childhood oppositionality may help to refine clinical approaches to ODD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-201005000-00008

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A longitudinal study of 7,140 children found that temperamental emotionality at age 3 predicted comorbid ADHD and internalizing disorders at age 7.

    “A longitudinal study of 7,140 children, found that while temperamental emotionality at age 3 predicted comorbid ADHD and internalizing disorders at age 7, activity level predicted comorbid ADHD and Oppositional Defiant Disorder (63).”
  • In 79 children with ADHD, emotion dysregulation was associated four years later with more psychiatric comorbidities, greater social impairment and ADHD persistence, compared to 98 subjects with ADHD without emotion dysregulation and 204 controls.

    “Such emotion dysregulation in 79 children with ADHD was associated four years later with more psychiatric comorbidities, greater social impairment and ADHD persistence, compared to 98 subjects with ADHD without emotion dysregulation and 204 controls.”
  • In the same longitudinal study, activity level predicted comorbid ADHD and Oppositional Defiant Disorder at age 7.

    “A longitudinal study of 7,140 children, found that while temperamental emotionality at age 3 predicted comorbid ADHD and internalizing disorders at age 7, activity level predicted comorbid ADHD and Oppositional Defiant Disorder (63).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stringaris, A., Maughan, B., & Goodman, R.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
474-483
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088289324
Cited by
120
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
oppositional defiant disorder, disruptive behavior disorders, temperament, emotionality, activity level, emotional dysregulation, ADHD comorbidity, internalizing disorders, early childhood, middle childhood, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Mental Disorders, Child, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review