Cited by 462Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild Abuse and Trauma

Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the ‘original sin’ hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention

Tremblay, Richard E.·2010·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

This paper reviews publications on developmental trajectories of disruptive behaviour (DB) problems (aggression, opposition-defiance, rule breaking, and stealing-vandalism) over the past decade. Prior to these studies two theoretical models had strongly influenced research on DB: social learning and disease onset. According to these developmental perspectives, children learn DB from their environment and onset of the disease is triggered by accumulated exposition to disruptive models in the environment, including the media. Most of the evidence came from studies of school age children and adolescents. Longitudinal studies tracing developmental trajectories of DB from early childhood onwards suggest an inversed developmental process. DB are universal during early childhood. With age, children learn socially acceptable behaviours from interactions with their environment. A 'disease' status is given to children who fail to learn the socially acceptable behaviours. The mechanisms that lead to deficits in using socially accepted behaviours are strongly intergenerational, based on complex genetic and environmental contributions, including epigenetic mechanisms. Prevention of these deficits requires early, intensive and long-term support to parents and child. Newly discovered epigenetic mechanisms suggest that intensive perinatal interventions will have impacts on numerous aspects of physical and mental health, including DB. This review also concludes that: a) subtypes of disruptive…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02211.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tremblay, R. E.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Tremblay, Richard E.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-11
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
341-367
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2122405077
Cited by
462
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 33
FWCI
33.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
aggression, oppositional defiant disorder, rule violations, developmental trajectories, social learning theory, epigenetics, perinatal interventions, prevention, early childhood, parental support
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anger, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Theory, Temperament, Intergenerational Relations, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review