Cited by 58Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsPain Management and Treatment

Artificial vision by direct optic nerve electrode (AV-DONE) implantation in a blind patient with retinitis pigmentosa

Sakaguchi, Hirokazu, Kamei, Motohiro, Fujikado, Takashi, Yonezawa, Eiji, Ozawa, Motoki, Cecilia-Gonzalez, Carmen, Ustariz-Gonzalez, Orlando, Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo +1 more·2009·Journal of Artificial Organs

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of artificial vision by using a direct optic nerve electrode (AV-DONE) in a blind patient with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). This device, comprising three wire electrodes (0.05 mm in diameter), was implanted into the optic disc of a patient with RP with no light perception vision and the device was left implanted. Six months later, visual sensations were elicited by electrical stimulation through each electrode and the thresholds for the phosphene perception elicited by pulses of 0.25-ms duration/phase and a pulse frequency of 320 Hz were 30, 5, and 70 microA for each electrode. The phosphenes, which ranged in size from that of a match head to an apple, were round, oval, or linear, primarily yellow, and focally distributed. The area of the phosphenes changed when the electrical stimulation was supplied from different electrodes. No complications arose during the follow-up period. Localized visual sensations were produced in a blind patient with advanced RP, suggesting that our system could lead to the development of a useful visual prosthesis system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10047-009-0467-2

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three platinum wires were implanted in the optic disc of an RP patient eliciting phosphenes in three distinct positions for each electrode.

    “Three platinum wires were implanted in the optic disc of an RP patient eliciting phosphenes in three distinct positions for each electrode [70].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakaguchi, H., Kamei, M., Fujikado, T., Yonezawa, E., Ozawa, M., Cecilia-Gonzalez, C., Ustariz-Gonzalez, O., Quiroz-Mercado, H., & Tano, Y.
Affiliations
  • Osaka University Hospital (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Nidek (Japan) (JP)
  • Asociacion Para Evitar la Ceguera en México Hospital Dr. Luis Sánchez Bulnes (MX)
Corresponding author
Sakaguchi, Hirokazu
Venue
Journal of Artificial Organs
Published
2009-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
206-209
ISSN
  • 1434-7229 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-0904
OpenAlex
W2016651677
Cited by
58
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Artificial Organs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
artificial vision, retinitis pigmentosa, visual prosthesis, phosphenes, electrical stimulation, blind patients, visual perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Blindness, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Optic Nerve, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Visual Perception, Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review